{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:USOSFYFPXSN43UDG2SCC5MHRDE","short_pith_number":"pith:USOSFYFP","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"a49d22e0afbc9bcdd066d4842eb0f1193b73d994a47f8ef59424e41d9d5fe966","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2506.03755","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Misalignment or misuse? The AGI alignment tradeoff","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Leonard Dung, Max Hellrigel-Holderbaum","submitted_at":"2025-06-04T09:22:37Z","abstract_excerpt":"Creating systems that are aligned with our goals is seen as a leading approach to create safe and beneficial AI in both leading AI companies and the academic field of AI safety. We defend the view that misaligned AGI - future, generally intelligent (robotic) AI agents - poses catastrophic risks. At the same time, we support the view that aligned AGI creates a substantial risk of catastrophic misuse by humans. While both risks are severe and stand in tension with one another, we show that - in principle - there is room for alignment approaches which do not increase misuse risk. We then investig"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2506.03755","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CY","submitted_at":"2025-06-04T09:22:37Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"b0ddc7aeb3351c5c23ba3264e76d872e2cfb9d5af1e4e26031bd64760799bd25","abstract_canon_sha256":"281346d7a7f9ff32c7f03235835fa0abdd9aa5c7966ecacf9d031fa4a9e7c1a6"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:51.451029Z","signature_b64":"uZAA6fzH6oklmHJ5wpP3zpMghEILCvt67VOWuIX6mYKF6uekyNX2eeZBPTrElcF/J/sTWFZDe0YzGlKcWTuMDA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"a49d22e0afbc9bcdd066d4842eb0f1193b73d994a47f8ef59424e41d9d5fe966","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:51.450543Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:51.450543Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Misalignment or misuse? The AGI alignment tradeoff","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Leonard Dung, Max Hellrigel-Holderbaum","submitted_at":"2025-06-04T09:22:37Z","abstract_excerpt":"Creating systems that are aligned with our goals is seen as a leading approach to create safe and beneficial AI in both leading AI companies and the academic field of AI safety. We defend the view that misaligned AGI - future, generally intelligent (robotic) AI agents - poses catastrophic risks. At the same time, we support the view that aligned AGI creates a substantial risk of catastrophic misuse by humans. While both risks are severe and stand in tension with one another, we show that - in principle - there is room for alignment approaches which do not increase misuse risk. We then investig"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2506.03755","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2506.03755/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2506.03755","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:51.450600+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2506.03755v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:51.450600+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2506.03755","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:51.450600+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"USOSFYFPXSN4","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:51.450600+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"USOSFYFPXSN43UDG","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:51.450600+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"USOSFYFP","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:51.450600+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.01346","citing_title":"Safety, Security, and Cognitive Risks in World Models","ref_index":67,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/USOSFYFPXSN43UDG2SCC5MHRDE","json":"https://pith.science/pith/USOSFYFPXSN43UDG2SCC5MHRDE.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/USOSFYFPXSN43UDG2SCC5MHRDE/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/USOSFYFPXSN43UDG2SCC5MHRDE/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/USOSFYFP"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/USOSFYFPXSN43UDG2SCC5MHRDE","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/USOSFYFPXSN43UDG2SCC5MHRDE.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/USOSFYFP","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2506.03755&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/USOSFYFPXSN43UDG2SCC5MHRDE/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/USOSFYFPXSN43UDG2SCC5MHRDE/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/USOSFYFPXSN43UDG2SCC5MHRDE/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/USOSFYFPXSN43UDG2SCC5MHRDE/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/USOSFYFPXSN43UDG2SCC5MHRDE/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/USOSFYFPXSN43UDG2SCC5MHRDE/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/USOSFYFPXSN43UDG2SCC5MHRDE/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:51.450600+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:51.450600+00:00"}