{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2018:UTSUIG67HAXQG67JIXBW4SOBQF","short_pith_number":"pith:UTSUIG67","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"a4e5441bdf382f037be945c36e49c1814edf24b1bcbdd21b88491e78686834e4","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1806.11415","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Failure of Perturbation Theory Near Horizons: the Rindler Example","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["gr-qc","hep-ph"],"primary_cat":"hep-th","authors_text":"C.P. Burgess, Greg Kaplanek, Joshua Hainge, Markus Rummel","submitted_at":"2018-06-29T13:50:11Z","abstract_excerpt":"Persistent puzzles to do with information loss for black holes have stimulated critical reassessment of the domain of validity of semiclassical EFT reasoning in curved spacetimes, particularly in the presence of horizons. We argue here that perturbative predictions about evolution for very long times near a horizon are subject to problems of secular growth - i.e. powers of small couplings come systematically together with growing functions of time. Such growth signals a breakdown of naive perturbative calculations of late-time behaviour, regardless of how small ambient curvatures might be. Sim"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1806.11415","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"hep-th","submitted_at":"2018-06-29T13:50:11Z","cross_cats_sorted":["gr-qc","hep-ph"],"title_canon_sha256":"af57d91d52400d5a403c30024b7602c207227a70d63315288211fde791a97bac","abstract_canon_sha256":"264ebd765f930add495a6084f1f21cf8d1793b9ec726519d127b4b7d401138b7"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T00:45:02.340023Z","signature_b64":"45jZVXVeMpdkgbYzdwf388mzNx6Wz1oNA+MCFxaQfczdDilmin6UREErKLqf86cCn1RmPY6SINnA6VJ9y28eAQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"a4e5441bdf382f037be945c36e49c1814edf24b1bcbdd21b88491e78686834e4","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T00:45:02.339489Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T00:45:02.339489Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Failure of Perturbation Theory Near Horizons: the Rindler Example","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["gr-qc","hep-ph"],"primary_cat":"hep-th","authors_text":"C.P. Burgess, Greg Kaplanek, Joshua Hainge, Markus Rummel","submitted_at":"2018-06-29T13:50:11Z","abstract_excerpt":"Persistent puzzles to do with information loss for black holes have stimulated critical reassessment of the domain of validity of semiclassical EFT reasoning in curved spacetimes, particularly in the presence of horizons. We argue here that perturbative predictions about evolution for very long times near a horizon are subject to problems of secular growth - i.e. powers of small couplings come systematically together with growing functions of time. Such growth signals a breakdown of naive perturbative calculations of late-time behaviour, regardless of how small ambient curvatures might be. Sim"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1806.11415","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/1806.11415/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1806.11415","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:45:02.339553+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1806.11415v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:45:02.339553+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1806.11415","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:45:02.339553+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"UTSUIG67HAXQ","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:45:02.339553+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"UTSUIG67HAXQG67J","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:45:02.339553+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"UTSUIG67","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:45:02.339553+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"1906.10180","citing_title":"Renormalisation in Open Quantum Field theory II: Yukawa theory and PV reduction","ref_index":18,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2411.01105","citing_title":"UV Effects and Short-Lived Hawking Radiation: Alternative Resolution of Information Paradox","ref_index":108,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/UTSUIG67HAXQG67JIXBW4SOBQF","json":"https://pith.science/pith/UTSUIG67HAXQG67JIXBW4SOBQF.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UTSUIG67HAXQG67JIXBW4SOBQF/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UTSUIG67HAXQG67JIXBW4SOBQF/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/UTSUIG67"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/UTSUIG67HAXQG67JIXBW4SOBQF","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/UTSUIG67HAXQG67JIXBW4SOBQF.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/UTSUIG67","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1806.11415&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UTSUIG67HAXQG67JIXBW4SOBQF/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UTSUIG67HAXQG67JIXBW4SOBQF/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/UTSUIG67HAXQG67JIXBW4SOBQF/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/UTSUIG67HAXQG67JIXBW4SOBQF/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/UTSUIG67HAXQG67JIXBW4SOBQF/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/UTSUIG67HAXQG67JIXBW4SOBQF/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/UTSUIG67HAXQG67JIXBW4SOBQF/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T00:45:02.339553+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T00:45:02.339553+00:00"}