{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2016:UUUZFBKVJ26GHICFC2IQ367RLK","short_pith_number":"pith:UUUZFBKV","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"a5299285554ebc63a04516910dfbf15abe9d9d91bda7c3c08cbbf7986e2ad232","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1603.03062","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Comment on \"Analysis of General Power Counting Rules in Effective Field Theory\"","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"A. Celis, C. Krause, G. Buchalla, O. Cata","submitted_at":"2016-03-09T21:16:25Z","abstract_excerpt":"In a recent paper [1] a master formula has been presented for the power counting of a general effective field theory. We first show that this master formula follows immediately from the concept of chiral dimensions (loop counting), together with standard dimensional analysis. Subsequently, [1] has disputed the relevance of chiral counting for chiral Lagrangians, and in particular for the electroweak chiral Lagrangian including a light Higgs boson. As an alternative, a power counting based on `primary dimensions' has been proposed. The difficulties encountered with this scheme led the authors t"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1603.03062","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2016-03-09T21:16:25Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"0ee25941894d65d32e5bef564ad52640fbc0f1386a9f40c218489840b1ddecc1","abstract_canon_sha256":"418a249019fffa340cb9cdeb47b43640b9ccfce0b9e3593bee8f208e6eb2c45c"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T01:19:19.110793Z","signature_b64":"UCT8U6wMX+llal4coctDfcZJpS251/RpD79igfQDYz7cAH95R+HCqlZqvandAk/mdqOs44XKyiZe7uutrFiWBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"a5299285554ebc63a04516910dfbf15abe9d9d91bda7c3c08cbbf7986e2ad232","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T01:19:19.110413Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T01:19:19.110413Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Comment on \"Analysis of General Power Counting Rules in Effective Field Theory\"","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"A. Celis, C. Krause, G. Buchalla, O. Cata","submitted_at":"2016-03-09T21:16:25Z","abstract_excerpt":"In a recent paper [1] a master formula has been presented for the power counting of a general effective field theory. We first show that this master formula follows immediately from the concept of chiral dimensions (loop counting), together with standard dimensional analysis. Subsequently, [1] has disputed the relevance of chiral counting for chiral Lagrangians, and in particular for the electroweak chiral Lagrangian including a light Higgs boson. As an alternative, a power counting based on `primary dimensions' has been proposed. The difficulties encountered with this scheme led the authors t"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1603.03062","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1603.03062","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:19:19.110480+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1603.03062v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:19:19.110480+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1603.03062","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:19:19.110480+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"UUUZFBKVJ26G","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:46.583412+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"UUUZFBKVJ26GHICF","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:46.583412+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"UUUZFBKV","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:46.583412+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2511.23410","citing_title":"The Art of Counting: a reappraisal of the HEFT expansion","ref_index":62,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/UUUZFBKVJ26GHICFC2IQ367RLK","json":"https://pith.science/pith/UUUZFBKVJ26GHICFC2IQ367RLK.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UUUZFBKVJ26GHICFC2IQ367RLK/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UUUZFBKVJ26GHICFC2IQ367RLK/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/UUUZFBKV"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/UUUZFBKVJ26GHICFC2IQ367RLK","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/UUUZFBKVJ26GHICFC2IQ367RLK.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/UUUZFBKV","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1603.03062&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UUUZFBKVJ26GHICFC2IQ367RLK/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UUUZFBKVJ26GHICFC2IQ367RLK/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/UUUZFBKVJ26GHICFC2IQ367RLK/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/UUUZFBKVJ26GHICFC2IQ367RLK/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/UUUZFBKVJ26GHICFC2IQ367RLK/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/UUUZFBKVJ26GHICFC2IQ367RLK/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/UUUZFBKVJ26GHICFC2IQ367RLK/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T01:19:19.110480+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T01:19:19.110480+00:00"}