{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:UV5TPJE27RITCA624W4V2XYVRI","short_pith_number":"pith:UV5TPJE2","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"a57b37a49afc513103dae5b95d5f158a317701a9cc2c7efb60ed3c32f50283ea","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2311.13729","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Comparison of pipeline, sequence-to-sequence, and GPT models for end-to-end relation extraction: experiments with the rare disease use-case","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Ramakanth Kavuluru, Shashank Gupta, Xuguang Ai","submitted_at":"2023-11-22T22:52:00Z","abstract_excerpt":"End-to-end relation extraction (E2ERE) is an important and realistic application of natural language processing (NLP) in biomedicine. In this paper, we aim to compare three prevailing paradigms for E2ERE using a complex dataset focused on rare diseases involving discontinuous and nested entities. We use the RareDis information extraction dataset to evaluate three competing approaches (for E2ERE): NER $\\rightarrow$ RE pipelines, joint sequence to sequence models, and generative pre-trained transformer (GPT) models. We use comparable state-of-the-art models and best practices for each of these a"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2311.13729","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2023-11-22T22:52:00Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"04782d3bdc71e55b4c4cdf8b00ad1be458eca6b8052c5ccd6475399bbeca9186","abstract_canon_sha256":"9657d5d8ce28979c3552fb86bfa2c300769a94f191d96199baf4374dd5dd10b3"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:43:05.306801Z","signature_b64":"dv4GF11IighNNmE/YfTO9yjc9A/yS5dnSU6DII+yCuicbgBVTSrQlIwQIWbOYk/lGvJp+Twg36dQrrzfAk06Dw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"a57b37a49afc513103dae5b95d5f158a317701a9cc2c7efb60ed3c32f50283ea","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:43:05.305968Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:43:05.305968Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Comparison of pipeline, sequence-to-sequence, and GPT models for end-to-end relation extraction: experiments with the rare disease use-case","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Ramakanth Kavuluru, Shashank Gupta, Xuguang Ai","submitted_at":"2023-11-22T22:52:00Z","abstract_excerpt":"End-to-end relation extraction (E2ERE) is an important and realistic application of natural language processing (NLP) in biomedicine. In this paper, we aim to compare three prevailing paradigms for E2ERE using a complex dataset focused on rare diseases involving discontinuous and nested entities. We use the RareDis information extraction dataset to evaluate three competing approaches (for E2ERE): NER $\\rightarrow$ RE pipelines, joint sequence to sequence models, and generative pre-trained transformer (GPT) models. We use comparable state-of-the-art models and best practices for each of these a"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2311.13729","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2311.13729/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2311.13729","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:43:05.306099+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2311.13729v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:43:05.306099+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2311.13729","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:43:05.306099+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"UV5TPJE27RIT","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:43:05.306099+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"UV5TPJE27RITCA62","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:43:05.306099+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"UV5TPJE2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:43:05.306099+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2507.09039","citing_title":"Towards Extracting Software Requirements from App Reviews using Seq2seq Framework","ref_index":26,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/UV5TPJE27RITCA624W4V2XYVRI","json":"https://pith.science/pith/UV5TPJE27RITCA624W4V2XYVRI.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UV5TPJE27RITCA624W4V2XYVRI/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UV5TPJE27RITCA624W4V2XYVRI/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/UV5TPJE2"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/UV5TPJE27RITCA624W4V2XYVRI","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/UV5TPJE27RITCA624W4V2XYVRI.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/UV5TPJE2","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2311.13729&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UV5TPJE27RITCA624W4V2XYVRI/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UV5TPJE27RITCA624W4V2XYVRI/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/UV5TPJE27RITCA624W4V2XYVRI/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/UV5TPJE27RITCA624W4V2XYVRI/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/UV5TPJE27RITCA624W4V2XYVRI/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/UV5TPJE27RITCA624W4V2XYVRI/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/UV5TPJE27RITCA624W4V2XYVRI/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:43:05.306099+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:43:05.306099+00:00"}