{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:UVEXPNRAMMZQYWHDKEMNYXIK4N","short_pith_number":"pith:UVEXPNRA","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"a54977b62063330c58e35118dc5d0ae37c2acb11e5cb36f901b4ed49564139b0","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2401.06416","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Mission: Impossible Language Models","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Christopher Potts, Isabel Papadimitriou, Julie Kallini, Kyle Mahowald, Richard Futrell","submitted_at":"2024-01-12T07:24:26Z","abstract_excerpt":"Chomsky and others have very directly claimed that large language models (LLMs) are equally capable of learning languages that are possible and impossible for humans to learn. However, there is very little published experimental evidence to support such a claim. Here, we develop a set of synthetic impossible languages of differing complexity, each designed by systematically altering English data with unnatural word orders and grammar rules. These languages lie on an impossibility continuum: at one end are languages that are inherently impossible, such as random and irreversible shuffles of Eng"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2401.06416","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-01-12T07:24:26Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"77658fbafa23bfdf52af9f4b7dcdf38904474d24ad8681bc2ec40da97fbfd3a6","abstract_canon_sha256":"dfd67d07f905a61e8633e741606eac2df68bb08aab307cdbf1aa0e258a102e3e"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:51:45.977382Z","signature_b64":"nixbVVDDAZkVrGiiozKhkx0ZHgDhQ6qLp3oxH8odQc0/CEza9gt/srjj7PVqcRjD2WtV+7L+IvrlSbis8Yk/BA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"a54977b62063330c58e35118dc5d0ae37c2acb11e5cb36f901b4ed49564139b0","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:51:45.976889Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:51:45.976889Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Mission: Impossible Language Models","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Christopher Potts, Isabel Papadimitriou, Julie Kallini, Kyle Mahowald, Richard Futrell","submitted_at":"2024-01-12T07:24:26Z","abstract_excerpt":"Chomsky and others have very directly claimed that large language models (LLMs) are equally capable of learning languages that are possible and impossible for humans to learn. However, there is very little published experimental evidence to support such a claim. Here, we develop a set of synthetic impossible languages of differing complexity, each designed by systematically altering English data with unnatural word orders and grammar rules. These languages lie on an impossibility continuum: at one end are languages that are inherently impossible, such as random and irreversible shuffles of Eng"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2401.06416","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2401.06416/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2401.06416","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:51:45.976947+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2401.06416v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:51:45.976947+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2401.06416","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:51:45.976947+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"UVEXPNRAMMZQ","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:51:45.976947+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"UVEXPNRAMMZQYWHD","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:51:45.976947+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"UVEXPNRA","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:51:45.976947+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.21555","citing_title":"Finding Meaning in Embeddings: Concept Separation Curves","ref_index":4,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.01381","citing_title":"A framework for analyzing concept representations in neural models","ref_index":243,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/UVEXPNRAMMZQYWHDKEMNYXIK4N","json":"https://pith.science/pith/UVEXPNRAMMZQYWHDKEMNYXIK4N.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UVEXPNRAMMZQYWHDKEMNYXIK4N/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UVEXPNRAMMZQYWHDKEMNYXIK4N/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/UVEXPNRA"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/UVEXPNRAMMZQYWHDKEMNYXIK4N","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/UVEXPNRAMMZQYWHDKEMNYXIK4N.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/UVEXPNRA","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2401.06416&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UVEXPNRAMMZQYWHDKEMNYXIK4N/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UVEXPNRAMMZQYWHDKEMNYXIK4N/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/UVEXPNRAMMZQYWHDKEMNYXIK4N/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/UVEXPNRAMMZQYWHDKEMNYXIK4N/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/UVEXPNRAMMZQYWHDKEMNYXIK4N/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/UVEXPNRAMMZQYWHDKEMNYXIK4N/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/UVEXPNRAMMZQYWHDKEMNYXIK4N/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:51:45.976947+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:51:45.976947+00:00"}