{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:UWW6W36NLWV23WEA6ZIFDIBLO3","short_pith_number":"pith:UWW6W36N","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"a5adeb6fcd5dabadd880f65051a02b76fc3628ec8c770b72d5f1ec563326c704","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2406.17583","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Towards Compositional Interpretability for XAI","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG","cs.LO","math.CT"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Bob Coecke, Ilyas Khan, Robin Lorenz, Sean Tull, Stephen Clark","submitted_at":"2024-06-25T14:27:03Z","abstract_excerpt":"Artificial intelligence (AI) is currently based largely on black-box machine learning models which lack interpretability. The field of eXplainable AI (XAI) strives to address this major concern, being critical in high-stakes areas such as the finance, legal and health sectors.\n  We present an approach to defining AI models and their interpretability based on category theory. For this we employ the notion of a compositional model, which sees a model in terms of formal string diagrams which capture its abstract structure together with its concrete implementation. This comprehensive view incorpor"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2406.17583","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2024-06-25T14:27:03Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.LG","cs.LO","math.CT"],"title_canon_sha256":"2eea2acd49e4964c35c287825403f9d6c1a5aad0bea9e99401a644a61fbe5600","abstract_canon_sha256":"66471083cda0697c9bb6e64ef31ca4fe263a2ec6c66cd9b3214d3ac76c1b55e2"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:36:37.351377Z","signature_b64":"Ldpu+s9R7tdYONLsyAAOlCMoBWs2JVRgxypGYZeI+r9n+JVOyRg/y3fU1vgPLbyvSspD26ZD101O+bfZuL/zCg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"a5adeb6fcd5dabadd880f65051a02b76fc3628ec8c770b72d5f1ec563326c704","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:36:37.350755Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:36:37.350755Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Towards Compositional Interpretability for XAI","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG","cs.LO","math.CT"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Bob Coecke, Ilyas Khan, Robin Lorenz, Sean Tull, Stephen Clark","submitted_at":"2024-06-25T14:27:03Z","abstract_excerpt":"Artificial intelligence (AI) is currently based largely on black-box machine learning models which lack interpretability. The field of eXplainable AI (XAI) strives to address this major concern, being critical in high-stakes areas such as the finance, legal and health sectors.\n  We present an approach to defining AI models and their interpretability based on category theory. For this we employ the notion of a compositional model, which sees a model in terms of formal string diagrams which capture its abstract structure together with its concrete implementation. This comprehensive view incorpor"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2406.17583","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2406.17583/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2406.17583","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:36:37.350828+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2406.17583v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:36:37.350828+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2406.17583","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:36:37.350828+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"UWW6W36NLWV2","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:36:37.350828+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"UWW6W36NLWV23WEA","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:36:37.350828+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"UWW6W36N","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:36:37.350828+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":5,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.12289","citing_title":"The Standard Interpretable Model: A general theory of interpretable machine learning to deductively design interpretable methods using Lagrangian mechanics","ref_index":15,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.00365","citing_title":"When AI meets quantum information: A comprehensive review","ref_index":217,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.01047","citing_title":"Conversable Complexity: Agentic LLM Collectives as Interpretable Substrates","ref_index":93,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.08934","citing_title":"From Mechanistic to Compositional Interpretability","ref_index":65,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.08891","citing_title":"Bilinear autoencoders find interpretable manifolds","ref_index":37,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/UWW6W36NLWV23WEA6ZIFDIBLO3","json":"https://pith.science/pith/UWW6W36NLWV23WEA6ZIFDIBLO3.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UWW6W36NLWV23WEA6ZIFDIBLO3/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UWW6W36NLWV23WEA6ZIFDIBLO3/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/UWW6W36N"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/UWW6W36NLWV23WEA6ZIFDIBLO3","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/UWW6W36NLWV23WEA6ZIFDIBLO3.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/UWW6W36N","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2406.17583&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UWW6W36NLWV23WEA6ZIFDIBLO3/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UWW6W36NLWV23WEA6ZIFDIBLO3/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/UWW6W36NLWV23WEA6ZIFDIBLO3/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/UWW6W36NLWV23WEA6ZIFDIBLO3/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/UWW6W36NLWV23WEA6ZIFDIBLO3/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/UWW6W36NLWV23WEA6ZIFDIBLO3/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/UWW6W36NLWV23WEA6ZIFDIBLO3/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:36:37.350828+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:36:37.350828+00:00"}