{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:1999:V3AXJIO7SQ6VYKCRJUFZ77KZ2X","short_pith_number":"pith:V3AXJIO7","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"aec174a1df943d5c28514d0b9ffd59d5d41d8ec7552bb5a05b09e1c421693781","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"hep-th/9907115","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Holographic Cosmology and its Relevant Degrees of Freedom","license":"","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-th","authors_text":"Richard Dawid","submitted_at":"1999-07-14T22:44:20Z","abstract_excerpt":"We reconsider the options for cosmological holography. We suggest that a global and time--symmetric version of the Fischler-Susskind bound is the most natural generalization of the holographic bound encountered in AdS and De Sitter space. A consistent discussion of cosmological holography seems to imply an understanding of the notion of ``number of degrees of freedom'' that deviates from its simple definition as the entropy of the current state. The introduction of a more adequate notion of degree of freedom makes the suggested variation of the Fischler-Susskind bound look like a stringent and"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"hep-th/9907115","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"","primary_cat":"hep-th","submitted_at":"1999-07-14T22:44:20Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"126d381d99675053965cc9e94f963f18d7b06261f8ce7d79bcb2912fef800b16","abstract_canon_sha256":"5889cb427ad4d2805d97f066a0974f27ca3ee5c4ba27232818bee1dc14dbcd9f"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-04T14:33:29.297456Z","signature_b64":"Asj4L6ahpoX7v8BB/T+qLFAKlT4sStRiS2J3lGKQ+zjg4Kxu6hNxWUOT+fX5/ItH+xMyp8rWtp/XHPC6IY9QCg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"aec174a1df943d5c28514d0b9ffd59d5d41d8ec7552bb5a05b09e1c421693781","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-04T14:33:29.296961Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-04T14:33:29.296961Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Holographic Cosmology and its Relevant Degrees of Freedom","license":"","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-th","authors_text":"Richard Dawid","submitted_at":"1999-07-14T22:44:20Z","abstract_excerpt":"We reconsider the options for cosmological holography. We suggest that a global and time--symmetric version of the Fischler-Susskind bound is the most natural generalization of the holographic bound encountered in AdS and De Sitter space. A consistent discussion of cosmological holography seems to imply an understanding of the notion of ``number of degrees of freedom'' that deviates from its simple definition as the entropy of the current state. The introduction of a more adequate notion of degree of freedom makes the suggested variation of the Fischler-Susskind bound look like a stringent and"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"hep-th/9907115","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/hep-th/9907115/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"hep-th/9907115","created_at":"2026-07-04T14:33:29.297014+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"hep-th/9907115v2","created_at":"2026-07-04T14:33:29.297014+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.hep-th/9907115","created_at":"2026-07-04T14:33:29.297014+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"V3AXJIO7SQ6V","created_at":"2026-07-04T14:33:29.297014+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"V3AXJIO7SQ6VYKCR","created_at":"2026-07-04T14:33:29.297014+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"V3AXJIO7","created_at":"2026-07-04T14:33:29.297014+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2508.13227","citing_title":"Testing the Generalized Second Law in $(2+1)$-Dimensional Cosmology: Holographic Entropy Bounds and Observational Constraints","ref_index":5,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/V3AXJIO7SQ6VYKCRJUFZ77KZ2X","json":"https://pith.science/pith/V3AXJIO7SQ6VYKCRJUFZ77KZ2X.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/V3AXJIO7SQ6VYKCRJUFZ77KZ2X/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/V3AXJIO7SQ6VYKCRJUFZ77KZ2X/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/V3AXJIO7"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/V3AXJIO7SQ6VYKCRJUFZ77KZ2X","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/V3AXJIO7SQ6VYKCRJUFZ77KZ2X.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/V3AXJIO7","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=hep-th/9907115&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/V3AXJIO7SQ6VYKCRJUFZ77KZ2X/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/V3AXJIO7SQ6VYKCRJUFZ77KZ2X/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/V3AXJIO7SQ6VYKCRJUFZ77KZ2X/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/V3AXJIO7SQ6VYKCRJUFZ77KZ2X/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/V3AXJIO7SQ6VYKCRJUFZ77KZ2X/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/V3AXJIO7SQ6VYKCRJUFZ77KZ2X/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/V3AXJIO7SQ6VYKCRJUFZ77KZ2X/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-04T14:33:29.297014+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-04T14:33:29.297014+00:00"}