{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:1995:V7HHHITHRU6SBTXTQTL6UICQCV","short_pith_number":"pith:V7HHHITH","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"afce73a2678d3d20cef384d7ea20501578dfe7f5ae68007641e15dbc6bebcec1","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"quant-ph/9501006","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"CAUSALITY, MEMORY ERASING AND DELAYED CHOICE EXPERIMENTS","license":"","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"L. Vaidman, S. Popsecu, Y. Aharonov","submitted_at":"1995-01-08T15:57:50Z","abstract_excerpt":"Comment on [R.L. Ingraham, Phys. Rev. A 50, 4502 (1994)]. Ingraham suggested ``a delayed-choice experiment with partial, controllable memory erasing''. It is shown that he cannot be right since his predictions contradict relativistic causality. A subtle quantum effect which was overlooked by Ingraham is explained."},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"quant-ph/9501006","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"1995-01-08T15:57:50Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"4a2e95467e94323bece22f7d90b3568ba87c85dcfe7b1a3e9fc471e32e9a0a59","abstract_canon_sha256":"4c3b77c6249898a6779382fc29f265f5e179f86862d542ffb7e74a4038202d69"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T01:05:02.515739Z","signature_b64":"Gn2y/iTCzV/amZ5P++Ksrl0vlu/qrhkqJthiMrsQJQz3TTEx3XYlvr2eTjsS9yjo4G/dYzz+rS0MojWIgKouCg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"afce73a2678d3d20cef384d7ea20501578dfe7f5ae68007641e15dbc6bebcec1","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T01:05:02.514999Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T01:05:02.514999Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"CAUSALITY, MEMORY ERASING AND DELAYED CHOICE EXPERIMENTS","license":"","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"L. Vaidman, S. Popsecu, Y. Aharonov","submitted_at":"1995-01-08T15:57:50Z","abstract_excerpt":"Comment on [R.L. Ingraham, Phys. Rev. A 50, 4502 (1994)]. Ingraham suggested ``a delayed-choice experiment with partial, controllable memory erasing''. It is shown that he cannot be right since his predictions contradict relativistic causality. A subtle quantum effect which was overlooked by Ingraham is explained."},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"quant-ph/9501006","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"quant-ph/9501006","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:05:02.515121+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"quant-ph/9501006v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:05:02.515121+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/9501006","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:05:02.515121+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"V7HHHITHRU6S","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:25:47.700082+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"V7HHHITHRU6SBTXT","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:25:47.700082+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"V7HHHITH","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:25:47.700082+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/V7HHHITHRU6SBTXTQTL6UICQCV","json":"https://pith.science/pith/V7HHHITHRU6SBTXTQTL6UICQCV.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/V7HHHITHRU6SBTXTQTL6UICQCV/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/V7HHHITHRU6SBTXTQTL6UICQCV/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/V7HHHITH"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/V7HHHITHRU6SBTXTQTL6UICQCV","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/V7HHHITHRU6SBTXTQTL6UICQCV.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/V7HHHITH","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=quant-ph/9501006&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/V7HHHITHRU6SBTXTQTL6UICQCV/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/V7HHHITHRU6SBTXTQTL6UICQCV/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/V7HHHITHRU6SBTXTQTL6UICQCV/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/V7HHHITHRU6SBTXTQTL6UICQCV/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/V7HHHITHRU6SBTXTQTL6UICQCV/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/V7HHHITHRU6SBTXTQTL6UICQCV/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/V7HHHITHRU6SBTXTQTL6UICQCV/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T01:05:02.515121+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T01:05:02.515121+00:00"}