{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:VA3632NEYL2RGOHO3VUA4OB4HK","short_pith_number":"pith:VA3632NE","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"a837ede9a4c2f51338eedd680e383c3aad9af8a4311b8c6ce6becf7b07b12fde","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2605.16139","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Block-equivalent finite Gabor frames","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"Finite Gabor systems are block-equivalent when either the modulation set or the translation set is a subgroup of Z_N.","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"math.FA","authors_text":"Laura De Carli, Luis Rodriguez, Oleg Asipchuk","submitted_at":"2026-05-15T16:19:19Z","abstract_excerpt":"We study finite systems of vectors whose frame operator matrices are unitarily equivalent, via explicit and computationally efficient unitary transformations, to block-diagonal matrices. We call such systems block-equivalent.\n  We show that a Gabor system $\\mathcal{G}=\\mathcal{G}(g,L\\times K)\\subset \\mathbb C^N$ is block-equivalent when either the modulation set $L$ or the translation set $K$ is a subgroup of $\\mathbb Z_N$. We also characterize situations in which the frame operator matrix becomes diagonal.\n  Finally, we show that geometric conditions on subsets of $\\mathbb Z_N$ force certain "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":true,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2605.16139","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"math.FA","submitted_at":"2026-05-15T16:19:19Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"53e0adeb2d30e06d249a971b53903c59c50f170d5e357eb7834a2efcc4f473ab","abstract_canon_sha256":"18895bfaa1910b53fa8cb604c29a7b979193458d9c5a6f5d9a53993a17c90271"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-20T00:01:54.673086Z","signature_b64":"fZYBJHOCki6mmWTCm8gk+ZVvlx7ypwDRgqAgrR0+WvGduEY1oWK5hbXK5s8Dx8bPc77FFGvqJV7xZhn4DgWUAA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"a837ede9a4c2f51338eedd680e383c3aad9af8a4311b8c6ce6becf7b07b12fde","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-20T00:01:54.672327Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-20T00:01:54.672327Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Block-equivalent finite Gabor frames","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"Finite Gabor systems are block-equivalent when either the modulation set or the translation set is a subgroup of Z_N.","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"math.FA","authors_text":"Laura De Carli, Luis Rodriguez, Oleg Asipchuk","submitted_at":"2026-05-15T16:19:19Z","abstract_excerpt":"We study finite systems of vectors whose frame operator matrices are unitarily equivalent, via explicit and computationally efficient unitary transformations, to block-diagonal matrices. We call such systems block-equivalent.\n  We show that a Gabor system $\\mathcal{G}=\\mathcal{G}(g,L\\times K)\\subset \\mathbb C^N$ is block-equivalent when either the modulation set $L$ or the translation set $K$ is a subgroup of $\\mathbb Z_N$. We also characterize situations in which the frame operator matrix becomes diagonal.\n  Finally, we show that geometric conditions on subsets of $\\mathbb Z_N$ force certain "},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"We show that a Gabor system G=G(g,L×K)⊂C^N is block-equivalent when either the modulation set L or the translation set K is a subgroup of Z_N. We also characterize situations in which the frame operator matrix becomes diagonal.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"The unitary transformations achieving the block-diagonal form are both explicit and computationally efficient, as required by the definition of block-equivalence; this premise enters when the authors invoke the subgroup property to construct the equivalence.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"Gabor systems in C^N with subgroup modulation or translation sets have frame operators that are unitarily equivalent to block-diagonal matrices, with further diagonal and sparsity results under geometric conditions.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"Finite Gabor systems are block-equivalent when either the modulation set or the translation set is a subgroup of Z_N.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"0134caccb861ea9e6e743ed71b31db22f8ed5f54bccbbac9feb3c1ed5ad06561"},"source":{"id":"2605.16139","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":"fd878368-8af6-4baa-be44-05cd8df16359","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-19T18:28:20.643246Z","strongest_claim":"We show that a Gabor system G=G(g,L×K)⊂C^N is block-equivalent when either the modulation set L or the translation set K is a subgroup of Z_N. We also characterize situations in which the frame operator matrix becomes diagonal.","one_line_summary":"Gabor systems in C^N with subgroup modulation or translation sets have frame operators that are unitarily equivalent to block-diagonal matrices, with further diagonal and sparsity results under geometric conditions.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"The unitary transformations achieving the block-diagonal form are both explicit and computationally efficient, as required by the definition of block-equivalence; this premise enters when the authors invoke the subgroup property to construct the equivalence.","pith_extraction_headline":"Finite Gabor systems are block-equivalent when either the modulation set or the translation set is a subgroup of Z_N."},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2605.16139/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[{"name":"doi_title_agreement","ran_at":"2026-05-19T19:01:18.949368Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"doi_compliance","ran_at":"2026-05-19T18:41:03.367890Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"cited_work_retraction","ran_at":"2026-05-19T18:22:03.939625Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"ai_meta_artifact","ran_at":"2026-05-19T17:33:31.050224Z","status":"skipped","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"claim_evidence","ran_at":"2026-05-19T16:41:55.454025Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0}],"snapshot_sha256":"2b4f5cb74c881148f5fd61c09becd3711088ade89c52b38e9117984a5d163199"},"references":{"count":23,"sample":[{"doi":"","year":2024,"title":"L. D. Abreu, P. Balazs, N. Holighaus, F. Luef, and M. Speckbacher,Time-frequency analysis on flat tori and Gabor frames in finite dimensions, Applied and Computa- tional Harmonic Analysis, vol. 69, 20","work_id":"3ab1a253-55bd-4cfc-b4b6-7a8a303030a3","ref_index":1,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":1989,"title":"E. J. Barbeau,Polynomials, Springer, New York, 1989","work_id":"e712ada5-0057-4a2f-922f-588af2d3bac9","ref_index":2,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2003,"title":"J. J. Benedetto and M. Fickus,Finite normalized tight frames, Advances in Compu- tational Mathematics, vol. 18, no. 2–4, 2003, pp. 357–385","work_id":"ea5f7fcc-ec98-469c-a61f-f7c462097a29","ref_index":3,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2016,"title":"Christensen,An Introduction to Frames and Riesz Bases, 2nd edition, Birkh¨ auser, Boston, 2016","work_id":"ed5d58ed-ac55-463a-a4e0-0af279ef21ad","ref_index":4,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":1999,"title":"E. M. Coven and A. Meyerowitz,Tiling the integers with translates of one finite set, Journal of Algebra, vol. 212, no. 1, 1999, pp. 161–174","work_id":"33bd8f83-830d-4699-bd6e-0cd0a1a439c3","ref_index":5,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false}],"resolved_work":23,"snapshot_sha256":"c75f6238312277eca277b93cd3f67eb0f379b457d384c873edda738ed2ffcac5","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.16139","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:01:54.672423+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.16139v1","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:01:54.672423+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.16139","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:01:54.672423+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"VA3632NEYL2R","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:01:54.672423+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"VA3632NEYL2RGOHO","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:01:54.672423+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"VA3632NE","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:01:54.672423+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/VA3632NEYL2RGOHO3VUA4OB4HK","json":"https://pith.science/pith/VA3632NEYL2RGOHO3VUA4OB4HK.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VA3632NEYL2RGOHO3VUA4OB4HK/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VA3632NEYL2RGOHO3VUA4OB4HK/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/VA3632NE"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/VA3632NEYL2RGOHO3VUA4OB4HK","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/VA3632NEYL2RGOHO3VUA4OB4HK.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/VA3632NE","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2605.16139&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VA3632NEYL2RGOHO3VUA4OB4HK/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VA3632NEYL2RGOHO3VUA4OB4HK/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/VA3632NEYL2RGOHO3VUA4OB4HK/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/VA3632NEYL2RGOHO3VUA4OB4HK/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/VA3632NEYL2RGOHO3VUA4OB4HK/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/VA3632NEYL2RGOHO3VUA4OB4HK/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/VA3632NEYL2RGOHO3VUA4OB4HK/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-20T00:01:54.672423+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-20T00:01:54.672423+00:00"}