{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2017:VB6P4UETJHHXDIU7AU6LKFW46W","short_pith_number":"pith:VB6P4UET","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"a87cfe509349cf71a29f053cb516dcf595c100cb41e0fc8a5e7f96f77dafe45f","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1702.03688","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Logical Randomized Benchmarking","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Christopher Ferrie, Christopher Granade, Joshua Combes, Steven T. Flammia","submitted_at":"2017-02-13T09:48:24Z","abstract_excerpt":"Extrapolating physical error rates to logical error rates requires many assumptions and thus can radically under- or overestimate the performance of an error correction implementation. We introduce logical randomized benchmarking, a characterization procedure that directly assesses the performance of a quantum error correction implementation at the logical level, and is motivated by a reduction to the well-studied case of physical randomized benchmarking. We show that our method reliably reports logical performance and can estimate the average probability of correctable and uncorrectable error"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1702.03688","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2017-02-13T09:48:24Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"d5a3b4db9718ac231ee3b44936dd516829b89ab455586cadf56dd003363464e2","abstract_canon_sha256":"7e92b5982bd4887d8b6e7e10a5ac95a482151ed5c4a633cbdf923e706b73ed8c"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:50:53.238352Z","signature_b64":"27GFEegXbqyOHrilhWok7HWxoc7tZZlnCXCJhKvCBZ/ctDtKwCpL9AJ/yuTZlA0cMFcdR9gIWBJf8Vi49f9UCQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"a87cfe509349cf71a29f053cb516dcf595c100cb41e0fc8a5e7f96f77dafe45f","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:50:53.237729Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:50:53.237729Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Logical Randomized Benchmarking","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Christopher Ferrie, Christopher Granade, Joshua Combes, Steven T. Flammia","submitted_at":"2017-02-13T09:48:24Z","abstract_excerpt":"Extrapolating physical error rates to logical error rates requires many assumptions and thus can radically under- or overestimate the performance of an error correction implementation. We introduce logical randomized benchmarking, a characterization procedure that directly assesses the performance of a quantum error correction implementation at the logical level, and is motivated by a reduction to the well-studied case of physical randomized benchmarking. We show that our method reliably reports logical performance and can estimate the average probability of correctable and uncorrectable error"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1702.03688","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1702.03688","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:50:53.237808+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1702.03688v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:50:53.237808+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1702.03688","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:50:53.237808+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"VB6P4UETJHHX","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:49.984773+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"VB6P4UETJHHXDIU7","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:49.984773+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"VB6P4UET","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:49.984773+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":4,"internal_anchor_count":3,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2510.13051","citing_title":"Blind-spots of Randomized Benchmarking Under Temporal Correlations","ref_index":38,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2412.18578","citing_title":"Randomized Benchmarking with Synthetic Quantum Circuits","ref_index":41,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2511.12777","citing_title":"Sdim: A Qudit Stabilizer Simulator","ref_index":16,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.19871","citing_title":"Co-Designing Error Mitigation and Error Detection for Logical Qubits","ref_index":43,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/VB6P4UETJHHXDIU7AU6LKFW46W","json":"https://pith.science/pith/VB6P4UETJHHXDIU7AU6LKFW46W.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VB6P4UETJHHXDIU7AU6LKFW46W/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VB6P4UETJHHXDIU7AU6LKFW46W/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/VB6P4UET"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/VB6P4UETJHHXDIU7AU6LKFW46W","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/VB6P4UETJHHXDIU7AU6LKFW46W.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/VB6P4UET","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1702.03688&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VB6P4UETJHHXDIU7AU6LKFW46W/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VB6P4UETJHHXDIU7AU6LKFW46W/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/VB6P4UETJHHXDIU7AU6LKFW46W/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/VB6P4UETJHHXDIU7AU6LKFW46W/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/VB6P4UETJHHXDIU7AU6LKFW46W/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/VB6P4UETJHHXDIU7AU6LKFW46W/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/VB6P4UETJHHXDIU7AU6LKFW46W/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:50:53.237808+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:50:53.237808+00:00"}