{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:VF3W63QC6OGCOXHS6KEZSEBRVE","short_pith_number":"pith:VF3W63QC","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"a9776f6e02f38c275cf2f289991031a922d9375c6248aa1269e58fedb2e2710a","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2602.09305","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Reward Modeling for Reinforcement Learning-Based LLM Reasoning: Design, Challenges, and Evaluation","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Pei-Chi Pan, Sen Lin, Yingbin Liang","submitted_at":"2026-02-10T00:45:24Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate transformative potential, yet their reasoning remains inconsistent and unreliable. Reinforcement learning (RL)-based fine-tuning is a key mechanism for improvement, but its effectiveness is fundamentally governed by reward design. Despite its importance, the relationship between reward modeling and core LLM challenges--such as evaluation bias, hallucination, distribution shift, and efficient learning--remains poorly understood. This work argues that reward modeling is not merely an implementation detail but a central architect of reasoning alignment, sh"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2602.09305","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2026-02-10T00:45:24Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"262c8108b0b86a824b6357dbd167037be45f834d28f6c14d933d14549640b451","abstract_canon_sha256":"e1a0b0d64abe0ccfd17fd31b8ee8925f2993ff731859ab64db6e86d526ef0d8d"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-06-30T01:17:33.810304Z","signature_b64":"aY5SKyy/lJ9++Dtu0kyGspYxE2+r3WvC8RoyJV2HH8AzhBYNKO2cTByRueZ6kEdjo825WDp2bovElwvp/gCJCg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"a9776f6e02f38c275cf2f289991031a922d9375c6248aa1269e58fedb2e2710a","last_reissued_at":"2026-06-30T01:17:33.809625Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-06-30T01:17:33.809625Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Reward Modeling for Reinforcement Learning-Based LLM Reasoning: Design, Challenges, and Evaluation","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Pei-Chi Pan, Sen Lin, Yingbin Liang","submitted_at":"2026-02-10T00:45:24Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate transformative potential, yet their reasoning remains inconsistent and unreliable. Reinforcement learning (RL)-based fine-tuning is a key mechanism for improvement, but its effectiveness is fundamentally governed by reward design. Despite its importance, the relationship between reward modeling and core LLM challenges--such as evaluation bias, hallucination, distribution shift, and efficient learning--remains poorly understood. This work argues that reward modeling is not merely an implementation detail but a central architect of reasoning alignment, sh"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2602.09305","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2602.09305/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2602.09305","created_at":"2026-06-30T01:17:33.809710+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2602.09305v2","created_at":"2026-06-30T01:17:33.809710+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2602.09305","created_at":"2026-06-30T01:17:33.809710+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"VF3W63QC6OGC","created_at":"2026-06-30T01:17:33.809710+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"VF3W63QC6OGCOXHS","created_at":"2026-06-30T01:17:33.809710+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"VF3W63QC","created_at":"2026-06-30T01:17:33.809710+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":2,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.29984","citing_title":"Be Faithful When Response: Returning Fluent and Grounded Answers for Vision-Language Models Reinforcement Learning","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.16913","citing_title":"The Cognitive Penalty: Ablating System 1 and System 2 Reasoning in Edge-Native SLMs for Decentralized Consensus","ref_index":15,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/VF3W63QC6OGCOXHS6KEZSEBRVE","json":"https://pith.science/pith/VF3W63QC6OGCOXHS6KEZSEBRVE.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VF3W63QC6OGCOXHS6KEZSEBRVE/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VF3W63QC6OGCOXHS6KEZSEBRVE/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/VF3W63QC"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/VF3W63QC6OGCOXHS6KEZSEBRVE","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/VF3W63QC6OGCOXHS6KEZSEBRVE.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/VF3W63QC","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2602.09305&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VF3W63QC6OGCOXHS6KEZSEBRVE/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VF3W63QC6OGCOXHS6KEZSEBRVE/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/VF3W63QC6OGCOXHS6KEZSEBRVE/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/VF3W63QC6OGCOXHS6KEZSEBRVE/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/VF3W63QC6OGCOXHS6KEZSEBRVE/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/VF3W63QC6OGCOXHS6KEZSEBRVE/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/VF3W63QC6OGCOXHS6KEZSEBRVE/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-06-30T01:17:33.809710+00:00","updated_at":"2026-06-30T01:17:33.809710+00:00"}