{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2019:VFPRLTVV7BO4TA62M5EJEM6SCY","short_pith_number":"pith:VFPRLTVV","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"a95f15ceb5f85dc983da67489233d2161bd251a2721b64687676a9ed5f7297f8","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1909.00393","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"A Dataset of General-Purpose Rebuttal","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Ariel Gera, Lena Dankin, Lili Kotlerman, Matan Orbach, Michal Jacovi, Noam Slonim, Ranit Aharonov, Shachar Mirkin, Tamar Lavee, Yoav Kantor, Yonatan Bilu","submitted_at":"2019-09-01T13:24:35Z","abstract_excerpt":"In Natural Language Understanding, the task of response generation is usually focused on responses to short texts, such as tweets or a turn in a dialog. Here we present a novel task of producing a critical response to a long argumentative text, and suggest a method based on general rebuttal arguments to address it. We do this in the context of the recently-suggested task of listening comprehension over argumentative content: given a speech on some specified topic, and a list of relevant arguments, the goal is to determine which of the arguments appear in the speech. The general rebuttals we de"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1909.00393","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2019-09-01T13:24:35Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"6b7061d334892a25a58a01a9ab790d1a59ba8e42a809c31bcc53cf99b374d53a","abstract_canon_sha256":"e29a076e3487b365f03c2c5b44481303c084a8c4d840f2c9a7198553f9d1302b"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T00:01:08.667176Z","signature_b64":"soMnyXhPksscX6eU//ZnVdL5qLlDDXUzJe7n0bUha+z1BgvAP0RdgufWwdVZcxWsk2d8jmALtpg/5wZgyuc8Ag==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"a95f15ceb5f85dc983da67489233d2161bd251a2721b64687676a9ed5f7297f8","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T00:01:08.666693Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T00:01:08.666693Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"A Dataset of General-Purpose Rebuttal","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Ariel Gera, Lena Dankin, Lili Kotlerman, Matan Orbach, Michal Jacovi, Noam Slonim, Ranit Aharonov, Shachar Mirkin, Tamar Lavee, Yoav Kantor, Yonatan Bilu","submitted_at":"2019-09-01T13:24:35Z","abstract_excerpt":"In Natural Language Understanding, the task of response generation is usually focused on responses to short texts, such as tweets or a turn in a dialog. Here we present a novel task of producing a critical response to a long argumentative text, and suggest a method based on general rebuttal arguments to address it. We do this in the context of the recently-suggested task of listening comprehension over argumentative content: given a speech on some specified topic, and a list of relevant arguments, the goal is to determine which of the arguments appear in the speech. The general rebuttals we de"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1909.00393","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/1909.00393/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1909.00393","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:01:08.666750+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1909.00393v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:01:08.666750+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1909.00393","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:01:08.666750+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"VFPRLTVV7BO4","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:01:08.666750+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"VFPRLTVV7BO4TA62","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:01:08.666750+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"VFPRLTVV","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:01:08.666750+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2601.18081","citing_title":"DRPG (Decompose, Retrieve, Plan, Generate): An Agentic Framework for Academic Rebuttal","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/VFPRLTVV7BO4TA62M5EJEM6SCY","json":"https://pith.science/pith/VFPRLTVV7BO4TA62M5EJEM6SCY.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VFPRLTVV7BO4TA62M5EJEM6SCY/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VFPRLTVV7BO4TA62M5EJEM6SCY/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/VFPRLTVV"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/VFPRLTVV7BO4TA62M5EJEM6SCY","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/VFPRLTVV7BO4TA62M5EJEM6SCY.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/VFPRLTVV","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1909.00393&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VFPRLTVV7BO4TA62M5EJEM6SCY/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VFPRLTVV7BO4TA62M5EJEM6SCY/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/VFPRLTVV7BO4TA62M5EJEM6SCY/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/VFPRLTVV7BO4TA62M5EJEM6SCY/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/VFPRLTVV7BO4TA62M5EJEM6SCY/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/VFPRLTVV7BO4TA62M5EJEM6SCY/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/VFPRLTVV7BO4TA62M5EJEM6SCY/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T00:01:08.666750+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T00:01:08.666750+00:00"}