{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2017:VFXPS4P75XSOG4BJLCCCLCWDAF","short_pith_number":"pith:VFXPS4P7","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"a96ef971ffede4e370295884258ac3016fcb0e2b8ad8ebdfe409b7dde5c32cba","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1707.07884","version":4},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Taming the Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Johannes Fankhauser","submitted_at":"2017-07-25T09:46:47Z","abstract_excerpt":"I discuss the delayed choice quantum eraser experiment (DCQE) by drawing an analogy to a Bell-type measurement and giving a straightforward account in standard quantum mechanics. The delayed choice quantum eraser experiment turns out to resemble a Bell-type scenario in which the paradox's resolution is rather trivial, and so there really is no mystery. At first glance, the experiment suggests that measurements on one part of an entangled photon pair (the idler) can be employed to control whether the measurement outcome of the other part of the photon pair (the signal) produces interference fri"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1707.07884","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2017-07-25T09:46:47Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"20a26cee380ad06a1b10c966c79881053c4388994489907ad994058a58a75c3d","abstract_canon_sha256":"e2d4604c5caa01a642671294a4893ce9dc87eaf15da71d0fd8fb45072f1e2769"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-04T23:55:05.858414Z","signature_b64":"TXJVjxD7YUxSU4M6X1kXM7BjqwYlE3qs3/8qoFYZW2ryS5gOIpMXXsK7KLgW2Of+hiWWzz2pqFChI91Sb4m+CQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"a96ef971ffede4e370295884258ac3016fcb0e2b8ad8ebdfe409b7dde5c32cba","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-04T23:55:05.858029Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-04T23:55:05.858029Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Taming the Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Johannes Fankhauser","submitted_at":"2017-07-25T09:46:47Z","abstract_excerpt":"I discuss the delayed choice quantum eraser experiment (DCQE) by drawing an analogy to a Bell-type measurement and giving a straightforward account in standard quantum mechanics. The delayed choice quantum eraser experiment turns out to resemble a Bell-type scenario in which the paradox's resolution is rather trivial, and so there really is no mystery. At first glance, the experiment suggests that measurements on one part of an entangled photon pair (the idler) can be employed to control whether the measurement outcome of the other part of the photon pair (the signal) produces interference fri"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1707.07884","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/1707.07884/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1707.07884","created_at":"2026-07-04T23:55:05.858079+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1707.07884v4","created_at":"2026-07-04T23:55:05.858079+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1707.07884","created_at":"2026-07-04T23:55:05.858079+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"VFXPS4P75XSO","created_at":"2026-07-04T23:55:05.858079+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"VFXPS4P75XSOG4BJ","created_at":"2026-07-04T23:55:05.858079+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"VFXPS4P7","created_at":"2026-07-04T23:55:05.858079+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.00406","citing_title":"Bell Correlations and Selection Bias","ref_index":3,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/VFXPS4P75XSOG4BJLCCCLCWDAF","json":"https://pith.science/pith/VFXPS4P75XSOG4BJLCCCLCWDAF.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VFXPS4P75XSOG4BJLCCCLCWDAF/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VFXPS4P75XSOG4BJLCCCLCWDAF/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/VFXPS4P7"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/VFXPS4P75XSOG4BJLCCCLCWDAF","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/VFXPS4P75XSOG4BJLCCCLCWDAF.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/VFXPS4P7","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1707.07884&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VFXPS4P75XSOG4BJLCCCLCWDAF/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VFXPS4P75XSOG4BJLCCCLCWDAF/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/VFXPS4P75XSOG4BJLCCCLCWDAF/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/VFXPS4P75XSOG4BJLCCCLCWDAF/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/VFXPS4P75XSOG4BJLCCCLCWDAF/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/VFXPS4P75XSOG4BJLCCCLCWDAF/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/VFXPS4P75XSOG4BJLCCCLCWDAF/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-04T23:55:05.858079+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-04T23:55:05.858079+00:00"}