{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:VGJ74ZUGQLZFKFIUXYW2BAFVIX","short_pith_number":"pith:VGJ74ZUG","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"a993fe668682f2551514be2da080b545c8d3e44d638639317cfc0d5bece89447","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2602.14367","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"InnoEval: On Research Idea Evaluation as a Knowledge-Grounded, Multi-Perspective Reasoning Problem","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.IR","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Bin Wu, Boyang Xue, Emine Yilmaz, Hossein A. Rahmani, Huajun Chen, Jeff Z. Pan, Keyan Ding, Ningyu Zhang, Qiang Zhang, Shuofei Qiao, Xuehai Wang, Yanshan Wang, Yunxiang Wei","submitted_at":"2026-02-16T00:40:31Z","abstract_excerpt":"The rapid evolution of Large Language Models has catalyzed a surge in scientific idea production, yet this leap has not been accompanied by a matching advance in idea evaluation. The fundamental nature of scientific evaluation needs knowledgeable grounding, collective deliberation, and multi-criteria decision-making. However, existing idea evaluation methods often suffer from narrow knowledge horizons, flattened evaluation dimensions, and the inherent bias in LLM-as-a-Judge. To address these, we regard idea evaluation as a knowledge-grounded, multi-perspective reasoning problem and introduce I"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2602.14367","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2026-02-16T00:40:31Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.IR","cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"aed7983ce7319d1c2b18f0d9a691ceca86a4afba8df0e74b77b7d39d7a10306a","abstract_canon_sha256":"5090a680c81233cd932c3a5ee27c0db99f1f9d17cb4a1fd50100a52ce30629cd"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-06-12T01:09:22.616044Z","signature_b64":"lMWC8FObepves2E/p1a77ah+IX2TItVGOZFzCWlSYnoEzzqZ1nMPNlGEgJ5YI1fXzH3Q3ew9MBd+DYQktM8eAQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"a993fe668682f2551514be2da080b545c8d3e44d638639317cfc0d5bece89447","last_reissued_at":"2026-06-12T01:09:22.615391Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-06-12T01:09:22.615391Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"InnoEval: On Research Idea Evaluation as a Knowledge-Grounded, Multi-Perspective Reasoning Problem","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.IR","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Bin Wu, Boyang Xue, Emine Yilmaz, Hossein A. Rahmani, Huajun Chen, Jeff Z. Pan, Keyan Ding, Ningyu Zhang, Qiang Zhang, Shuofei Qiao, Xuehai Wang, Yanshan Wang, Yunxiang Wei","submitted_at":"2026-02-16T00:40:31Z","abstract_excerpt":"The rapid evolution of Large Language Models has catalyzed a surge in scientific idea production, yet this leap has not been accompanied by a matching advance in idea evaluation. The fundamental nature of scientific evaluation needs knowledgeable grounding, collective deliberation, and multi-criteria decision-making. However, existing idea evaluation methods often suffer from narrow knowledge horizons, flattened evaluation dimensions, and the inherent bias in LLM-as-a-Judge. To address these, we regard idea evaluation as a knowledge-grounded, multi-perspective reasoning problem and introduce I"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2602.14367","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2602.14367/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2602.14367","created_at":"2026-06-12T01:09:22.615468+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2602.14367v2","created_at":"2026-06-12T01:09:22.615468+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2602.14367","created_at":"2026-06-12T01:09:22.615468+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"VGJ74ZUGQLZF","created_at":"2026-06-12T01:09:22.615468+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"VGJ74ZUGQLZFKFIU","created_at":"2026-06-12T01:09:22.615468+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"VGJ74ZUG","created_at":"2026-06-12T01:09:22.615468+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.22878","citing_title":"SciAtlas: A Large-Scale Knowledge Graph for Automated Scientific Research","ref_index":57,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/VGJ74ZUGQLZFKFIUXYW2BAFVIX","json":"https://pith.science/pith/VGJ74ZUGQLZFKFIUXYW2BAFVIX.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VGJ74ZUGQLZFKFIUXYW2BAFVIX/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VGJ74ZUGQLZFKFIUXYW2BAFVIX/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/VGJ74ZUG"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/VGJ74ZUGQLZFKFIUXYW2BAFVIX","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/VGJ74ZUGQLZFKFIUXYW2BAFVIX.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/VGJ74ZUG","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2602.14367&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VGJ74ZUGQLZFKFIUXYW2BAFVIX/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VGJ74ZUGQLZFKFIUXYW2BAFVIX/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/VGJ74ZUGQLZFKFIUXYW2BAFVIX/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/VGJ74ZUGQLZFKFIUXYW2BAFVIX/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/VGJ74ZUGQLZFKFIUXYW2BAFVIX/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/VGJ74ZUGQLZFKFIUXYW2BAFVIX/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/VGJ74ZUGQLZFKFIUXYW2BAFVIX/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-06-12T01:09:22.615468+00:00","updated_at":"2026-06-12T01:09:22.615468+00:00"}