{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:VGUQUSDU47W2C4I6GIACH4P32L","short_pith_number":"pith:VGUQUSDU","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"a9a90a4874e7eda1711e320023f1fbd2eacd9f5a73542e9797e9e053f79532d6","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2602.02235","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Agent-Based Software Artifact Evaluation","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Haoyu Wang, Yanjie Zhao, Zhaonan Wu, Zheng Wang, Zhenpeng Chen","submitted_at":"2026-02-02T15:41:16Z","abstract_excerpt":"Artifact Evaluation (AE) has become a standard mechanism for linking software engineering papers to their supporting artifacts, but growing submission volume makes purely manual AE increasingly difficult to sustain. Although recent advances in LLM-based agents make AE automation increasingly plausible, current descriptive badge policies define badge semantics but provide no executable verification criteria, leaving both human reviewers and agents without a detailed basis for judgment. To address this gap, we construct ArtifactGuide, a structured scoring rubric grounded in ACM policy, expert-in"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2602.02235","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.SE","submitted_at":"2026-02-02T15:41:16Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"5ebbc309cc129b3b17a26668868a4a40c6bc92cc53b2dfdcf04efa6a6081fc73","abstract_canon_sha256":"c8311e7ec61522175bdbc2e2306f6ceedc0378833309a0dc2f97c040d2d90236"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-15T01:20:55.056504Z","signature_b64":"ymMe24VAqVL7Ewv5EE3CcRH+O+5gcqLsj8NqP37tDIjRasBuEcT8ojL0FdxJLror0NfJqOUmCVW2BbDHBTfHBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"a9a90a4874e7eda1711e320023f1fbd2eacd9f5a73542e9797e9e053f79532d6","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-15T01:20:55.055596Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-15T01:20:55.055596Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Agent-Based Software Artifact Evaluation","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Haoyu Wang, Yanjie Zhao, Zhaonan Wu, Zheng Wang, Zhenpeng Chen","submitted_at":"2026-02-02T15:41:16Z","abstract_excerpt":"Artifact Evaluation (AE) has become a standard mechanism for linking software engineering papers to their supporting artifacts, but growing submission volume makes purely manual AE increasingly difficult to sustain. Although recent advances in LLM-based agents make AE automation increasingly plausible, current descriptive badge policies define badge semantics but provide no executable verification criteria, leaving both human reviewers and agents without a detailed basis for judgment. To address this gap, we construct ArtifactGuide, a structured scoring rubric grounded in ACM policy, expert-in"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2602.02235","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2602.02235/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2602.02235","created_at":"2026-07-15T01:20:55.056020+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2602.02235v3","created_at":"2026-07-15T01:20:55.056020+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2602.02235","created_at":"2026-07-15T01:20:55.056020+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"VGUQUSDU47W2","created_at":"2026-07-15T01:20:55.056020+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"VGUQUSDU47W2C4I6","created_at":"2026-07-15T01:20:55.056020+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"VGUQUSDU","created_at":"2026-07-15T01:20:55.056020+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.06508","citing_title":"On the Security of Research Artifacts","ref_index":24,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/VGUQUSDU47W2C4I6GIACH4P32L","json":"https://pith.science/pith/VGUQUSDU47W2C4I6GIACH4P32L.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VGUQUSDU47W2C4I6GIACH4P32L/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VGUQUSDU47W2C4I6GIACH4P32L/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/VGUQUSDU"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/VGUQUSDU47W2C4I6GIACH4P32L","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/VGUQUSDU47W2C4I6GIACH4P32L.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/VGUQUSDU","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2602.02235&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VGUQUSDU47W2C4I6GIACH4P32L/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VGUQUSDU47W2C4I6GIACH4P32L/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/VGUQUSDU47W2C4I6GIACH4P32L/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/VGUQUSDU47W2C4I6GIACH4P32L/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/VGUQUSDU47W2C4I6GIACH4P32L/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/VGUQUSDU47W2C4I6GIACH4P32L/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/VGUQUSDU47W2C4I6GIACH4P32L/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-15T01:20:55.056020+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-15T01:20:55.056020+00:00"}