{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2003:VI3JC6CFX42S3JQAGHMPQYHPLM","short_pith_number":"pith:VI3JC6CF","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"aa36917845bf352da60031d8f860ef5b1f19ea9e4956c6d236dbc548bc0790e2","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"hep-th/0305070","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Comments on nonunitary conformal field theories","license":"","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-th","authors_text":"T. Gannon","submitted_at":"2003-05-08T23:08:23Z","abstract_excerpt":"As is well-known, nonunitary RCFTs are distinguished from unitary ones in a number of ways, two of which are that the vacuum 0 doesn't have minimal conformal weight, and that the vacuum column of the modular S matrix isn't positive. However there is another primary field, call it o, which has minimal weight and has positive S column. We find that often there is a precise and useful relationship, which we call the Galois shuffle, between primary o and the vacuum; among other things this can explain why (like the vacuum) its multiplicity in the full RCFT should be 1. As examples we consider the "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"hep-th/0305070","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"","primary_cat":"hep-th","submitted_at":"2003-05-08T23:08:23Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"7efeed73646ee84f15aabf0ed483108573a5f6ad45b43d0fa2184cd085c1b70a","abstract_canon_sha256":"03b92afc1a39bb1d4abe767879e67d13420d6fa614535cddee8212118a48df06"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T04:35:23.370257Z","signature_b64":"8KvLsMzDcahBM8pz7EenRv8qogkPng6zIcL+VA6w2M/a5WMcSO26WFiaW74UyOsUQO7qZn7y9/qVlzQNp7vtDQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"aa36917845bf352da60031d8f860ef5b1f19ea9e4956c6d236dbc548bc0790e2","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T04:35:23.369848Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T04:35:23.369848Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Comments on nonunitary conformal field theories","license":"","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-th","authors_text":"T. Gannon","submitted_at":"2003-05-08T23:08:23Z","abstract_excerpt":"As is well-known, nonunitary RCFTs are distinguished from unitary ones in a number of ways, two of which are that the vacuum 0 doesn't have minimal conformal weight, and that the vacuum column of the modular S matrix isn't positive. However there is another primary field, call it o, which has minimal weight and has positive S column. We find that often there is a precise and useful relationship, which we call the Galois shuffle, between primary o and the vacuum; among other things this can explain why (like the vacuum) its multiplicity in the full RCFT should be 1. As examples we consider the "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"hep-th/0305070","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"hep-th/0305070","created_at":"2026-05-18T04:35:23.369902+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"hep-th/0305070v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T04:35:23.369902+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.hep-th/0305070","created_at":"2026-05-18T04:35:23.369902+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"VI3JC6CFX42S","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:25:52.051335+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"VI3JC6CFX42S3JQA","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:25:52.051335+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"VI3JC6CF","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:25:52.051335+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":2,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2508.08639","citing_title":"Extending fusion rules with finite subgroups: A general construction of $Z_{N}$ extended conformal field theories and their orbifoldings","ref_index":136,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2511.11059","citing_title":"Generalizing quantum dimensions: Symmetry-based classification of local pseudo-Hermitian systems and the corresponding domain walls","ref_index":145,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.11277","citing_title":"Updating the holomorphic modular bootstrap","ref_index":27,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/VI3JC6CFX42S3JQAGHMPQYHPLM","json":"https://pith.science/pith/VI3JC6CFX42S3JQAGHMPQYHPLM.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VI3JC6CFX42S3JQAGHMPQYHPLM/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VI3JC6CFX42S3JQAGHMPQYHPLM/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/VI3JC6CF"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/VI3JC6CFX42S3JQAGHMPQYHPLM","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/VI3JC6CFX42S3JQAGHMPQYHPLM.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/VI3JC6CF","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=hep-th/0305070&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VI3JC6CFX42S3JQAGHMPQYHPLM/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VI3JC6CFX42S3JQAGHMPQYHPLM/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/VI3JC6CFX42S3JQAGHMPQYHPLM/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/VI3JC6CFX42S3JQAGHMPQYHPLM/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/VI3JC6CFX42S3JQAGHMPQYHPLM/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/VI3JC6CFX42S3JQAGHMPQYHPLM/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/VI3JC6CFX42S3JQAGHMPQYHPLM/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T04:35:23.369902+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T04:35:23.369902+00:00"}