{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2015:VI6QZIJMBCW74PZEAETFPL5EDA","short_pith_number":"pith:VI6QZIJM","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"aa3d0ca12c08adfe3f24012657afa4181f029b118ff879d227544105bd5af6f4","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1506.08925","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Quantum causal models, faithfulness and retrocausality","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Peter W. Evans","submitted_at":"2015-06-30T03:24:59Z","abstract_excerpt":"Wood and Spekkens (2015) argue that any causal model explaining the EPRB correlations and satisfying no-signalling must also violate the assumption that the model faithfully reproduces the statistical dependences and independences---a so-called \"fine-tuning\" of the causal parameters; this includes, in particular, retrocausal explanations of the EPRB correlations. I consider this analysis with a view to enumerating the possible responses an advocate of retrocausal explanations might propose. I focus on the response of N\\\"{a}ger (2015), who argues that the central ideas of causal explanations ca"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1506.08925","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2015-06-30T03:24:59Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"6020206357fdfef5d8c1b2bae37f43086f3203c7059aa094832c39ff0a0c4310","abstract_canon_sha256":"34023b7732b6995d21fa5c8b5e03e2219d9667db27772b519d0402ad2c56859b"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T06:24:07.699011Z","signature_b64":"bG2WK9qKsOuILYulQKAEOzM2WQW4DmvijCz/5e3h0oGmde9XrBoQM2uEf3oRA8mUbucqo5PRMaUR5oINlZ3oDg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"aa3d0ca12c08adfe3f24012657afa4181f029b118ff879d227544105bd5af6f4","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T06:24:07.698631Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T06:24:07.698631Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Quantum causal models, faithfulness and retrocausality","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Peter W. Evans","submitted_at":"2015-06-30T03:24:59Z","abstract_excerpt":"Wood and Spekkens (2015) argue that any causal model explaining the EPRB correlations and satisfying no-signalling must also violate the assumption that the model faithfully reproduces the statistical dependences and independences---a so-called \"fine-tuning\" of the causal parameters; this includes, in particular, retrocausal explanations of the EPRB correlations. I consider this analysis with a view to enumerating the possible responses an advocate of retrocausal explanations might propose. I focus on the response of N\\\"{a}ger (2015), who argues that the central ideas of causal explanations ca"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1506.08925","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/1506.08925/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1506.08925","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:24:07.698688+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1506.08925v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:24:07.698688+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1506.08925","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:24:07.698688+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"VI6QZIJMBCW7","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:24:07.698688+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"VI6QZIJMBCW74PZE","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:24:07.698688+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"VI6QZIJM","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:24:07.698688+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2507.15128","citing_title":"Taming Entanglement","ref_index":24,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/VI6QZIJMBCW74PZEAETFPL5EDA","json":"https://pith.science/pith/VI6QZIJMBCW74PZEAETFPL5EDA.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VI6QZIJMBCW74PZEAETFPL5EDA/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VI6QZIJMBCW74PZEAETFPL5EDA/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/VI6QZIJM"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/VI6QZIJMBCW74PZEAETFPL5EDA","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/VI6QZIJMBCW74PZEAETFPL5EDA.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/VI6QZIJM","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1506.08925&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VI6QZIJMBCW74PZEAETFPL5EDA/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VI6QZIJMBCW74PZEAETFPL5EDA/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/VI6QZIJMBCW74PZEAETFPL5EDA/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/VI6QZIJMBCW74PZEAETFPL5EDA/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/VI6QZIJMBCW74PZEAETFPL5EDA/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/VI6QZIJMBCW74PZEAETFPL5EDA/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/VI6QZIJMBCW74PZEAETFPL5EDA/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T06:24:07.698688+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T06:24:07.698688+00:00"}