{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:VIDVC5MTL72RO5KYMSXRHYDYBK","short_pith_number":"pith:VIDVC5MT","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"aa075175935ff517755864af13e0780a9de3bea2b9559196b9d95b3620df0f10","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2409.20296","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"PersonalLLM: Tailoring LLMs to Individual Preferences","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Andrew Wei Tung Siah, Ang Li, Hongseok Namkoong, Naimeng Ye, Thomas P. Zollo","submitted_at":"2024-09-30T13:55:42Z","abstract_excerpt":"As LLMs become capable of complex tasks, there is growing potential for personalized interactions tailored to the subtle and idiosyncratic preferences of the user. We present a public benchmark, PersonalLLM, focusing on adapting LLMs to provide maximal benefits for a particular user. Departing from existing alignment benchmarks that implicitly assume uniform preferences, we curate open-ended prompts paired with many high-quality answers over which users would be expected to display heterogeneous latent preferences. Instead of persona-prompting LLMs based on high-level attributes (e.g., user's "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2409.20296","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2024-09-30T13:55:42Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CL"],"title_canon_sha256":"f9fed182cea28cef83a0162fa518451dd76d7105bb8b5cc2792cc61c5ae90d6a","abstract_canon_sha256":"1568b1900eedd3ecc7679c9c8d7ab21acfdf79b489fa06e75b0d814d06a2c5da"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:18:42.126994Z","signature_b64":"fbhrrK7nV9Ec9Yz9bUpdVXnpJNEWNzGJ0iS9YqR6gdYMd5K4hVqTUCfqz4m9FNCk5/vYoDKGQYT8FzcSKQk1Cg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"aa075175935ff517755864af13e0780a9de3bea2b9559196b9d95b3620df0f10","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:18:42.126272Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:18:42.126272Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"PersonalLLM: Tailoring LLMs to Individual Preferences","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Andrew Wei Tung Siah, Ang Li, Hongseok Namkoong, Naimeng Ye, Thomas P. Zollo","submitted_at":"2024-09-30T13:55:42Z","abstract_excerpt":"As LLMs become capable of complex tasks, there is growing potential for personalized interactions tailored to the subtle and idiosyncratic preferences of the user. We present a public benchmark, PersonalLLM, focusing on adapting LLMs to provide maximal benefits for a particular user. Departing from existing alignment benchmarks that implicitly assume uniform preferences, we curate open-ended prompts paired with many high-quality answers over which users would be expected to display heterogeneous latent preferences. Instead of persona-prompting LLMs based on high-level attributes (e.g., user's "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2409.20296","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2409.20296/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2409.20296","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:18:42.126362+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2409.20296v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:18:42.126362+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2409.20296","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:18:42.126362+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"VIDVC5MTL72R","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:18:42.126362+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"VIDVC5MTL72RO5KY","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:18:42.126362+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"VIDVC5MT","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:18:42.126362+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":5,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.09038","citing_title":"Personalization Meets Safety:Mechanisms,Risks,and Mitigations in Personalized LLMs","ref_index":24,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.07988","citing_title":"PAFO: Pareto Fairness Optimization for Personalized Reward Modeling","ref_index":20,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.27443","citing_title":"When Does Personality Composition Matter for Multi-Agent LLM Teams?","ref_index":13,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.27141","citing_title":"VitaBench 2.0: Evaluating Personalized and Proactive Agents in Long-Term User Interactions","ref_index":36,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.18565","citing_title":"MINTEval: Evaluating Memory under Multi-Target Interference in Long-Horizon Agent Systems","ref_index":29,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/VIDVC5MTL72RO5KYMSXRHYDYBK","json":"https://pith.science/pith/VIDVC5MTL72RO5KYMSXRHYDYBK.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VIDVC5MTL72RO5KYMSXRHYDYBK/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VIDVC5MTL72RO5KYMSXRHYDYBK/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/VIDVC5MT"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/VIDVC5MTL72RO5KYMSXRHYDYBK","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/VIDVC5MTL72RO5KYMSXRHYDYBK.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/VIDVC5MT","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2409.20296&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VIDVC5MTL72RO5KYMSXRHYDYBK/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VIDVC5MTL72RO5KYMSXRHYDYBK/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/VIDVC5MTL72RO5KYMSXRHYDYBK/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/VIDVC5MTL72RO5KYMSXRHYDYBK/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/VIDVC5MTL72RO5KYMSXRHYDYBK/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/VIDVC5MTL72RO5KYMSXRHYDYBK/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/VIDVC5MTL72RO5KYMSXRHYDYBK/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:18:42.126362+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:18:42.126362+00:00"}