{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2020:VJCUCCYB7NDC26HGU3ZKCTSZN3","short_pith_number":"pith:VJCUCCYB","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"aa45410b01fb462d78e6a6f2a14e596ed0d3d86b9a507451d9dc74eb4df09d9c","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2011.10058","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Causality, Unitarity and Symmetry in Effective Field Theory","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-th"],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"Timothy Trott","submitted_at":"2020-11-19T19:00:02Z","abstract_excerpt":"Sum rules in effective field theories, predicated upon causality, place restrictions on scattering amplitudes mediated by effective contact interactions. Through unitarity of the $S$-matrix, these imply that the size of higher dimensional corrections to transition amplitudes between different states is bounded by the strength of their contributions to elastic forward scattering processes. This places fundamental limits on the extent to which hypothetical symmetries can be broken by effective interactions. All analysis is for dimension $8$ operators in the forward limit. Included is a thorough "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2011.10058","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2020-11-19T19:00:02Z","cross_cats_sorted":["hep-th"],"title_canon_sha256":"fb550dbe8153e43bf7d73e2d08766e4be229dea21c12d6adade2cfbea7f2332d","abstract_canon_sha256":"e97d72281d1d45829c2abbcf8d2d689e4e4074c1d952e03b5e0655b10525a8f2"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T03:19:41.003514Z","signature_b64":"gtrylb9nveSCV58UrDuxGYl8gObV/oG/8IHBbEPr77UDJyyhbSVgldB7I00W9uAbKz8lENZKl1/cCGIWJ+V0Dg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"aa45410b01fb462d78e6a6f2a14e596ed0d3d86b9a507451d9dc74eb4df09d9c","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T03:19:41.003002Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T03:19:41.003002Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Causality, Unitarity and Symmetry in Effective Field Theory","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-th"],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"Timothy Trott","submitted_at":"2020-11-19T19:00:02Z","abstract_excerpt":"Sum rules in effective field theories, predicated upon causality, place restrictions on scattering amplitudes mediated by effective contact interactions. Through unitarity of the $S$-matrix, these imply that the size of higher dimensional corrections to transition amplitudes between different states is bounded by the strength of their contributions to elastic forward scattering processes. This places fundamental limits on the extent to which hypothetical symmetries can be broken by effective interactions. All analysis is for dimension $8$ operators in the forward limit. Included is a thorough "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2011.10058","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2011.10058/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2011.10058","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:19:41.003067+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2011.10058v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:19:41.003067+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2011.10058","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:19:41.003067+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"VJCUCCYB7NDC","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:19:41.003067+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"VJCUCCYB7NDC26HG","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:19:41.003067+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"VJCUCCYB","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:19:41.003067+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":6,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2402.16956","citing_title":"Positivity in Amplitudes and Quantum Entanglement","ref_index":17,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.20319","citing_title":"The Equivalence Principle at High Energies Completes the Spectrum","ref_index":58,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2509.06630","citing_title":"Positivity bounds from thermal field theory entropy","ref_index":30,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2603.15755","citing_title":"Negative running of gravitational positivity","ref_index":71,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.00107","citing_title":"Full positivity bounds for anomalous quartic gauge couplings in SMEFT","ref_index":15,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.06796","citing_title":"Decaying spin-3/2 dark matter from baryon number violation","ref_index":54,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/VJCUCCYB7NDC26HGU3ZKCTSZN3","json":"https://pith.science/pith/VJCUCCYB7NDC26HGU3ZKCTSZN3.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VJCUCCYB7NDC26HGU3ZKCTSZN3/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VJCUCCYB7NDC26HGU3ZKCTSZN3/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/VJCUCCYB"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/VJCUCCYB7NDC26HGU3ZKCTSZN3","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/VJCUCCYB7NDC26HGU3ZKCTSZN3.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/VJCUCCYB","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2011.10058&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VJCUCCYB7NDC26HGU3ZKCTSZN3/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VJCUCCYB7NDC26HGU3ZKCTSZN3/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/VJCUCCYB7NDC26HGU3ZKCTSZN3/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/VJCUCCYB7NDC26HGU3ZKCTSZN3/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/VJCUCCYB7NDC26HGU3ZKCTSZN3/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/VJCUCCYB7NDC26HGU3ZKCTSZN3/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/VJCUCCYB7NDC26HGU3ZKCTSZN3/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T03:19:41.003067+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T03:19:41.003067+00:00"}