{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:VM56LFWFZTAKZDHIZLSK7ODNRL","short_pith_number":"pith:VM56LFWF","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"ab3be596c5ccc0ac8ce8cae4afb86d8aed3b8eb1099e61a7a2cbfd765817fb06","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2412.16352","version":6},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Counting Defiers: A Design-Based Model of an Experiment Can Reveal Evidence Beyond the Average Effect","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"econ.EM","authors_text":"Amanda Ellen Kowalski, Neil Christy","submitted_at":"2024-12-20T21:27:02Z","abstract_excerpt":"Using only a binary intervention and outcome and the design of the randomization within an experiment, we construct a design-based likelihood of the joint distribution of potential outcomes in the sample -- the numbers of always takers, compliers, defiers, and never takers. We develop a visualization to show that samples with defiers can sometimes generate the data in more ways than samples without, yielding a higher likelihood. This likelihood can vary within the Frechet bounds, even though the traditional likelihood does not. Evidence is weak, but it exists, as we illustrate with health appl"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2412.16352","kind":"arxiv","version":6},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"econ.EM","submitted_at":"2024-12-20T21:27:02Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"2efa6f5b3db65cfd6f0a716cbe97d0855702f6e07de4aa09eb370ba3696d842a","abstract_canon_sha256":"63ef0ba56855fa02ca5686c1bfb6b5ccc356ede27cde31a5fa3242c8d21e3f9d"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-06-23T02:13:13.601956Z","signature_b64":"flkDrMd3k3Q75fokaW+OXBJjByVZ7qkWzlSa5pSRAfxl2TNVb0Xd/ydc29KxiXPJKF2ZjrnTVsHDxq++yC4jDA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"ab3be596c5ccc0ac8ce8cae4afb86d8aed3b8eb1099e61a7a2cbfd765817fb06","last_reissued_at":"2026-06-23T02:13:13.601486Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-06-23T02:13:13.601486Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Counting Defiers: A Design-Based Model of an Experiment Can Reveal Evidence Beyond the Average Effect","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"econ.EM","authors_text":"Amanda Ellen Kowalski, Neil Christy","submitted_at":"2024-12-20T21:27:02Z","abstract_excerpt":"Using only a binary intervention and outcome and the design of the randomization within an experiment, we construct a design-based likelihood of the joint distribution of potential outcomes in the sample -- the numbers of always takers, compliers, defiers, and never takers. We develop a visualization to show that samples with defiers can sometimes generate the data in more ways than samples without, yielding a higher likelihood. This likelihood can vary within the Frechet bounds, even though the traditional likelihood does not. Evidence is weak, but it exists, as we illustrate with health appl"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2412.16352","kind":"arxiv","version":6},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2412.16352/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2412.16352","created_at":"2026-06-23T02:13:13.601545+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2412.16352v6","created_at":"2026-06-23T02:13:13.601545+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2412.16352","created_at":"2026-06-23T02:13:13.601545+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"VM56LFWFZTAK","created_at":"2026-06-23T02:13:13.601545+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"VM56LFWFZTAKZDHI","created_at":"2026-06-23T02:13:13.601545+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"VM56LFWF","created_at":"2026-06-23T02:13:13.601545+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2412.16352","citing_title":"Counting Defiers: A Design-Based Model of an Experiment Can Reveal Evidence Beyond the Average Effect","ref_index":17,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/VM56LFWFZTAKZDHIZLSK7ODNRL","json":"https://pith.science/pith/VM56LFWFZTAKZDHIZLSK7ODNRL.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VM56LFWFZTAKZDHIZLSK7ODNRL/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VM56LFWFZTAKZDHIZLSK7ODNRL/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/VM56LFWF"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/VM56LFWFZTAKZDHIZLSK7ODNRL","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/VM56LFWFZTAKZDHIZLSK7ODNRL.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/VM56LFWF","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2412.16352&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VM56LFWFZTAKZDHIZLSK7ODNRL/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VM56LFWFZTAKZDHIZLSK7ODNRL/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/VM56LFWFZTAKZDHIZLSK7ODNRL/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/VM56LFWFZTAKZDHIZLSK7ODNRL/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/VM56LFWFZTAKZDHIZLSK7ODNRL/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/VM56LFWFZTAKZDHIZLSK7ODNRL/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/VM56LFWFZTAKZDHIZLSK7ODNRL/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-06-23T02:13:13.601545+00:00","updated_at":"2026-06-23T02:13:13.601545+00:00"}