{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:VMG6DBXLMUJA3CPY5KI3766BJG","short_pith_number":"pith:VMG6DBXL","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"ab0de186eb65120d89f8ea91bffbc14984791c945727ee222e5fce9b08e44f53","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2408.00315","version":4},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"ADBM: Adversarial diffusion bridge model for reliable adversarial purification","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CV"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Huanran Chen, Jie Shi, Qiongxiu Li, Wenxuan Sun, Xiao Li, Xiaolin Hu, Yingzhe He, Yining Liu","submitted_at":"2024-08-01T06:26:05Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recently Diffusion-based Purification (DiffPure) has been recognized as an effective defense method against adversarial examples. However, we find DiffPure which directly employs the original pre-trained diffusion models for adversarial purification, to be suboptimal. This is due to an inherent trade-off between noise purification performance and data recovery quality. Additionally, the reliability of existing evaluations for DiffPure is questionable, as they rely on weak adaptive attacks. In this work, we propose a novel Adversarial Diffusion Bridge Model, termed ADBM. ADBM directly construct"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2408.00315","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2024-08-01T06:26:05Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.CV"],"title_canon_sha256":"639f3229e0e18661ecc27171056781d46e2728aa3d1658050eaa675d9a59ff8d","abstract_canon_sha256":"6f93b7aee1a248dea425328b0921ec6a95a1d4e0d68626cb7f2be3f1a269b136"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:34:09.555617Z","signature_b64":"2lI8hIqdTme915+Zyfydz0Ff8wn6iltUlVfqxXAd2BjC1BDt6op7Mq+3Dbl8Vt5xPjnrlZlejW8DZUgZiEa8AA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"ab0de186eb65120d89f8ea91bffbc14984791c945727ee222e5fce9b08e44f53","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:34:09.555053Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:34:09.555053Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"ADBM: Adversarial diffusion bridge model for reliable adversarial purification","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CV"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Huanran Chen, Jie Shi, Qiongxiu Li, Wenxuan Sun, Xiao Li, Xiaolin Hu, Yingzhe He, Yining Liu","submitted_at":"2024-08-01T06:26:05Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recently Diffusion-based Purification (DiffPure) has been recognized as an effective defense method against adversarial examples. However, we find DiffPure which directly employs the original pre-trained diffusion models for adversarial purification, to be suboptimal. This is due to an inherent trade-off between noise purification performance and data recovery quality. Additionally, the reliability of existing evaluations for DiffPure is questionable, as they rely on weak adaptive attacks. In this work, we propose a novel Adversarial Diffusion Bridge Model, termed ADBM. ADBM directly construct"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2408.00315","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2408.00315/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2408.00315","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:34:09.555115+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2408.00315v4","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:34:09.555115+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2408.00315","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:34:09.555115+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"VMG6DBXLMUJA","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:34:09.555115+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"VMG6DBXLMUJA3CPY","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:34:09.555115+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"VMG6DBXL","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:34:09.555115+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":4,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2502.05206","citing_title":"Safety at Scale: A Comprehensive Survey of Large Model and Agent Safety","ref_index":25,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2511.21893","citing_title":"Breaking the Illusion: Consensus-Based Generative Mitigation of Adversarial Illusions in Multi-Modal Embeddings","ref_index":15,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.06357","citing_title":"Memory Efficient Full-gradient Attacks (MEFA) Framework for Adversarial Defense Evaluations","ref_index":33,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.16966","citing_title":"Visual Inception: Compromising Long-term Planning in Agentic Recommenders via Multimodal Memory Poisoning","ref_index":3,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/VMG6DBXLMUJA3CPY5KI3766BJG","json":"https://pith.science/pith/VMG6DBXLMUJA3CPY5KI3766BJG.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VMG6DBXLMUJA3CPY5KI3766BJG/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VMG6DBXLMUJA3CPY5KI3766BJG/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/VMG6DBXL"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/VMG6DBXLMUJA3CPY5KI3766BJG","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/VMG6DBXLMUJA3CPY5KI3766BJG.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/VMG6DBXL","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2408.00315&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VMG6DBXLMUJA3CPY5KI3766BJG/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VMG6DBXLMUJA3CPY5KI3766BJG/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/VMG6DBXLMUJA3CPY5KI3766BJG/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/VMG6DBXLMUJA3CPY5KI3766BJG/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/VMG6DBXLMUJA3CPY5KI3766BJG/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/VMG6DBXLMUJA3CPY5KI3766BJG/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/VMG6DBXLMUJA3CPY5KI3766BJG/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:34:09.555115+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:34:09.555115+00:00"}