{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:VNJI2X3BKTTUS72H6YQEFL4XLY","short_pith_number":"pith:VNJI2X3B","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"ab528d5f6154e7497f47f62042af975e18c7ec9c20e2fdfceea5dbb5d3ef2997","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2210.12916","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Explaining epsilon in local differential privacy through the lens of quantitative information flow","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CR","math.IT"],"primary_cat":"cs.IT","authors_text":"Annabelle McIver, Natasha Fernandes, Parastoo Sadeghi","submitted_at":"2022-10-24T02:03:22Z","abstract_excerpt":"The study of leakage measures for privacy has been a subject of intensive research and is an important aspect of understanding how privacy leaks occur in computer systems. Differential privacy has been a focal point in the privacy community for some years and yet its leakage characteristics are not completely understood. In this paper we bring together two areas of research -- information theory and the g-leakage framework of quantitative information flow (QIF) -- to give an operational interpretation for the epsilon parameter of local differential privacy. We find that epsilon emerges as a ca"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2210.12916","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.IT","submitted_at":"2022-10-24T02:03:22Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CR","math.IT"],"title_canon_sha256":"9b8ea1cdd798d7a70f743342fbe3e547ea21c4e2072ca796e023c6da42303282","abstract_canon_sha256":"8f32f5f530720b4352742cdbd3c18cdf507da443d7ff1e075594ead3dfb546de"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T06:11:17.464674Z","signature_b64":"5fOMBteD0n9L1WNB/gs1g45cJPT0NBu954uY5pXC58XN5WFDI0Yzyy0fxEYRFBu4gKvW+Lpd/TBp2Mk9o/adBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"ab528d5f6154e7497f47f62042af975e18c7ec9c20e2fdfceea5dbb5d3ef2997","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T06:11:17.464165Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T06:11:17.464165Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Explaining epsilon in local differential privacy through the lens of quantitative information flow","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CR","math.IT"],"primary_cat":"cs.IT","authors_text":"Annabelle McIver, Natasha Fernandes, Parastoo Sadeghi","submitted_at":"2022-10-24T02:03:22Z","abstract_excerpt":"The study of leakage measures for privacy has been a subject of intensive research and is an important aspect of understanding how privacy leaks occur in computer systems. Differential privacy has been a focal point in the privacy community for some years and yet its leakage characteristics are not completely understood. In this paper we bring together two areas of research -- information theory and the g-leakage framework of quantitative information flow (QIF) -- to give an operational interpretation for the epsilon parameter of local differential privacy. We find that epsilon emerges as a ca"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2210.12916","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2210.12916/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2210.12916","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:11:17.464226+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2210.12916v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:11:17.464226+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2210.12916","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:11:17.464226+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"VNJI2X3BKTTU","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:11:17.464226+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"VNJI2X3BKTTUS72H","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:11:17.464226+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"VNJI2X3B","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:11:17.464226+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2502.04045","citing_title":"Comparing privacy notions for protection against reconstruction attacks in machine learning","ref_index":40,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/VNJI2X3BKTTUS72H6YQEFL4XLY","json":"https://pith.science/pith/VNJI2X3BKTTUS72H6YQEFL4XLY.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VNJI2X3BKTTUS72H6YQEFL4XLY/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VNJI2X3BKTTUS72H6YQEFL4XLY/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/VNJI2X3B"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/VNJI2X3BKTTUS72H6YQEFL4XLY","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/VNJI2X3BKTTUS72H6YQEFL4XLY.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/VNJI2X3B","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2210.12916&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VNJI2X3BKTTUS72H6YQEFL4XLY/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VNJI2X3BKTTUS72H6YQEFL4XLY/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/VNJI2X3BKTTUS72H6YQEFL4XLY/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/VNJI2X3BKTTUS72H6YQEFL4XLY/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/VNJI2X3BKTTUS72H6YQEFL4XLY/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/VNJI2X3BKTTUS72H6YQEFL4XLY/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/VNJI2X3BKTTUS72H6YQEFL4XLY/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T06:11:17.464226+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T06:11:17.464226+00:00"}