{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:VPNC3UNK6WMKTA4VOHV6DEFIXG","short_pith_number":"pith:VPNC3UNK","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"abda2dd1aaf598a9839571ebe190a8b99df66fc1f5daf453ad3c39eebe35a422","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2604.14135","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Temporary Power Adjusting Withholding Attack","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"Temporary withholding in pool attacks yields unbounded extra rewards over permanent withholding as attacker size shrinks.","cross_cats":["cs.DC","cs.IT","math.IT","math.PR"],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Mustafa Doger, Sennur Ulukus","submitted_at":"2026-04-15T17:55:56Z","abstract_excerpt":"We consider the block withholding attacks on pools, more specifically the state-of-the-art Power Adjusting Withholding (PAW) attack. We propose a generalization called Temporary PAW (T-PAW) where the adversary withholds a fPoW from pool mining at most $T$-time even when no other block is mined. We show that PAW attack corresponds to $T\\to\\infty$ and is not optimal. In fact, the extra reward of T-PAW compared to PAW improves by an unbounded factor as adversarial hash fraction $\\alpha$, pool size $\\beta$ and adversarial network influence $\\gamma$ decreases. For example, the extra reward of T-PAW"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2604.14135","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CR","submitted_at":"2026-04-15T17:55:56Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.DC","cs.IT","math.IT","math.PR"],"title_canon_sha256":"a14a7e4c55d762756329c0c3d59750cea964ddd26f308b52a348e2000df0ae37","abstract_canon_sha256":"2bf8e8365ecd85d699d23a5d4cf40417f8c1f9d192cdcf738e6e73dfea9a6a89"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-20T01:05:13.339593Z","signature_b64":"agVQf62OJgv2ibNylIIWJSV1czP7ZkVNCHCCchFe4m95I+7U2qIh5BMhBT0DebWsXHvg9BZ2EFlkTr1CXq2lDg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"abda2dd1aaf598a9839571ebe190a8b99df66fc1f5daf453ad3c39eebe35a422","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-20T01:05:13.338842Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-20T01:05:13.338842Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Temporary Power Adjusting Withholding Attack","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"Temporary withholding in pool attacks yields unbounded extra rewards over permanent withholding as attacker size shrinks.","cross_cats":["cs.DC","cs.IT","math.IT","math.PR"],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Mustafa Doger, Sennur Ulukus","submitted_at":"2026-04-15T17:55:56Z","abstract_excerpt":"We consider the block withholding attacks on pools, more specifically the state-of-the-art Power Adjusting Withholding (PAW) attack. We propose a generalization called Temporary PAW (T-PAW) where the adversary withholds a fPoW from pool mining at most $T$-time even when no other block is mined. We show that PAW attack corresponds to $T\\to\\infty$ and is not optimal. In fact, the extra reward of T-PAW compared to PAW improves by an unbounded factor as adversarial hash fraction $\\alpha$, pool size $\\beta$ and adversarial network influence $\\gamma$ decreases. For example, the extra reward of T-PAW"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"the extra reward of T-PAW compared to PAW improves by an unbounded factor as adversarial hash fraction α, pool size β and adversarial network influence γ decreases. For example, the extra reward of T-PAW is 22 times that of PAW when an adversary targets a pool with (α,β,γ)=(0.05,0.05,0).","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"The modeling assumes rational miners optimize over a specific reward function with parameters α, β, γ and a fixed T, without accounting for real-world detection, retaliation, or pool countermeasures that could eliminate the advantage.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"T-PAW generalizes PAW by limiting withholding to at most T time units, producing unboundedly higher extra rewards than PAW as adversary hash fraction, pool size, and network influence decrease, while making honest mining sub-optimal with non-trivial gains.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"Temporary withholding in pool attacks yields unbounded extra rewards over permanent withholding as attacker size shrinks.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"5f03712f00d755e355f5b74bf536ca9552bb16af685906f760f84ed2b8ff9938"},"source":{"id":"2604.14135","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":"56a69acb-42b8-475e-8594-251cdd71b558","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-10T12:50:03.073161Z","strongest_claim":"the extra reward of T-PAW compared to PAW improves by an unbounded factor as adversarial hash fraction α, pool size β and adversarial network influence γ decreases. For example, the extra reward of T-PAW is 22 times that of PAW when an adversary targets a pool with (α,β,γ)=(0.05,0.05,0).","one_line_summary":"T-PAW generalizes PAW by limiting withholding to at most T time units, producing unboundedly higher extra rewards than PAW as adversary hash fraction, pool size, and network influence decrease, while making honest mining sub-optimal with non-trivial gains.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"The modeling assumes rational miners optimize over a specific reward function with parameters α, β, γ and a fixed T, without accounting for real-world detection, retaliation, or pool countermeasures that could eliminate the advantage.","pith_extraction_headline":"Temporary withholding in pool attacks yields unbounded extra rewards over permanent withholding as attacker size shrinks."},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2604.14135/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2604.14135","created_at":"2026-05-20T01:05:13.338960+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2604.14135v2","created_at":"2026-05-20T01:05:13.338960+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2604.14135","created_at":"2026-05-20T01:05:13.338960+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"VPNC3UNK6WMK","created_at":"2026-05-20T01:05:13.338960+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"VPNC3UNK6WMKTA4V","created_at":"2026-05-20T01:05:13.338960+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"VPNC3UNK","created_at":"2026-05-20T01:05:13.338960+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/VPNC3UNK6WMKTA4VOHV6DEFIXG","json":"https://pith.science/pith/VPNC3UNK6WMKTA4VOHV6DEFIXG.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VPNC3UNK6WMKTA4VOHV6DEFIXG/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VPNC3UNK6WMKTA4VOHV6DEFIXG/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/VPNC3UNK"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/VPNC3UNK6WMKTA4VOHV6DEFIXG","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/VPNC3UNK6WMKTA4VOHV6DEFIXG.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/VPNC3UNK","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2604.14135&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VPNC3UNK6WMKTA4VOHV6DEFIXG/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VPNC3UNK6WMKTA4VOHV6DEFIXG/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/VPNC3UNK6WMKTA4VOHV6DEFIXG/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/VPNC3UNK6WMKTA4VOHV6DEFIXG/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/VPNC3UNK6WMKTA4VOHV6DEFIXG/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/VPNC3UNK6WMKTA4VOHV6DEFIXG/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/VPNC3UNK6WMKTA4VOHV6DEFIXG/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-20T01:05:13.338960+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-20T01:05:13.338960+00:00"}