{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:VVGMZGPS2G2QPRYWIKOJDWMABO","short_pith_number":"pith:VVGMZGPS","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"ad4ccc99f2d1b507c716429c91d9800b862dcd19cd13f2c6144cf58504d52004","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2206.11447","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Putting Flat $\\Lambda$CDM In The (Redshift) Bin","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["gr-qc","hep-ph","hep-th"],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"Dejan Stojkovic, Eoin \\'O Colg\\'ain, Maria G. Dainotti, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, Rance Solomon","submitted_at":"2022-06-23T01:40:10Z","abstract_excerpt":"Flat $\\Lambda$CDM cosmology is specified by two constant fitting parameters at the background level in the late Universe, the Hubble constant $H_0$ and matter density (today) $\\Omega_m$. Mathematically, $H_0$ and $\\Omega_m$ are either integration constants arising from solving ordinary differential equations or are directly related to integration constants. Seen in this context, if fits of the $\\Lambda$CDM model to cosmological probes at different redshifts lead to different $(H_0, \\Omega_m)$ parameters, this is a mismatch between mathematics and observation. Here, in mock observational Hubble"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2206.11447","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","submitted_at":"2022-06-23T01:40:10Z","cross_cats_sorted":["gr-qc","hep-ph","hep-th"],"title_canon_sha256":"40fdbc390985d46981c08e9928db4f5b5f84d75c3e0d2ad989c0b20b56445440","abstract_canon_sha256":"3120dca26e34542207854be65154aba797d613f331863b3200e618c53c446446"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T07:56:44.765481Z","signature_b64":"nwwUOxjIilRT+9/C5jT9aJpfeerrCkFWJdxAQP8GPfgFCCl7pyk2guGraLPz6ZD3faL0eBGHvjBYcmMtLQlkCA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"ad4ccc99f2d1b507c716429c91d9800b862dcd19cd13f2c6144cf58504d52004","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T07:56:44.764963Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T07:56:44.764963Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Putting Flat $\\Lambda$CDM In The (Redshift) Bin","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["gr-qc","hep-ph","hep-th"],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"Dejan Stojkovic, Eoin \\'O Colg\\'ain, Maria G. Dainotti, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, Rance Solomon","submitted_at":"2022-06-23T01:40:10Z","abstract_excerpt":"Flat $\\Lambda$CDM cosmology is specified by two constant fitting parameters at the background level in the late Universe, the Hubble constant $H_0$ and matter density (today) $\\Omega_m$. Mathematically, $H_0$ and $\\Omega_m$ are either integration constants arising from solving ordinary differential equations or are directly related to integration constants. Seen in this context, if fits of the $\\Lambda$CDM model to cosmological probes at different redshifts lead to different $(H_0, \\Omega_m)$ parameters, this is a mismatch between mathematics and observation. Here, in mock observational Hubble"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2206.11447","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2206.11447/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2206.11447","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:56:44.765022+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2206.11447v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:56:44.765022+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2206.11447","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:56:44.765022+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"VVGMZGPS2G2Q","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:56:44.765022+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"VVGMZGPS2G2QPRYW","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:56:44.765022+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"VVGMZGPS","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:56:44.765022+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":5,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.27173","citing_title":"Redshift-Dependent Intrinsic Dispersion in the Quasar UV/X-ray Luminosity Relation","ref_index":45,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2508.01759","citing_title":"Resolving the Planck-DESI tension by nonminimally coupled quintessence","ref_index":19,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2601.14222","citing_title":"Revisiting the Matter Creation Process: Observational Constraints on Gravitationally Induced Dark Energy and the Hubble Tension","ref_index":130,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2602.11093","citing_title":"New constraints on cosmic anisotropy from galaxy clusters using an improved dipole fitting method","ref_index":46,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2602.22840","citing_title":"Redshift evolution of the Hubble constant: Constraints and new insights from an interacting dark energy model","ref_index":43,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/VVGMZGPS2G2QPRYWIKOJDWMABO","json":"https://pith.science/pith/VVGMZGPS2G2QPRYWIKOJDWMABO.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VVGMZGPS2G2QPRYWIKOJDWMABO/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VVGMZGPS2G2QPRYWIKOJDWMABO/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/VVGMZGPS"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/VVGMZGPS2G2QPRYWIKOJDWMABO","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/VVGMZGPS2G2QPRYWIKOJDWMABO.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/VVGMZGPS","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2206.11447&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VVGMZGPS2G2QPRYWIKOJDWMABO/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VVGMZGPS2G2QPRYWIKOJDWMABO/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/VVGMZGPS2G2QPRYWIKOJDWMABO/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/VVGMZGPS2G2QPRYWIKOJDWMABO/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/VVGMZGPS2G2QPRYWIKOJDWMABO/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/VVGMZGPS2G2QPRYWIKOJDWMABO/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/VVGMZGPS2G2QPRYWIKOJDWMABO/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T07:56:44.765022+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T07:56:44.765022+00:00"}