{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:VX7VQLMBWFTSBV4D7R7SYBBIMJ","short_pith_number":"pith:VX7VQLMB","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"adff582d81b16720d783fc7f2c04286255af8e2242e69087c78256b14a36d34e","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2506.22497","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.DL","cs.SI","physics.hist-ph"],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Craig Steven Wright","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper reconceptualises peer review as structured public commentary. Traditional academic validation is hindered by anonymity, latency, and gatekeeping. We propose a transparent, identity-linked, and reproducible system of scholarly evaluation anchored in open commentary. Leveraging blockchain for immutable audit trails and AI for iterative synthesis, we design a framework that incentivises intellectual contribution, captures epistemic evolution, and enables traceable reputational dynamics. This model empowers fields from computational science to the humanities, reframing academic knowledg"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2506.22497","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CY","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.DL","cs.SI","physics.hist-ph"],"title_canon_sha256":"4f2cf6e4b7473db2d41c6e78f33110ea66c2d2e2a39a7874df22b9b8f987ffe7","abstract_canon_sha256":"d6ba6fc4f1ed3103b71d953b2d1933b02d242571ea9b9403ae242f6b2495f7ba"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:28:39.606230Z","signature_b64":"5FL9h9S6mYaN8H8iXMhp8CsKqUFai9uVWpvP7MZTflyvub/E2U1LBPkI8MkbrRBpWbmGyQpcIZcqR+j5+xwECg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"adff582d81b16720d783fc7f2c04286255af8e2242e69087c78256b14a36d34e","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:28:39.605783Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:28:39.605783Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.DL","cs.SI","physics.hist-ph"],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Craig Steven Wright","submitted_at":"2025-06-25T03:57:40Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper reconceptualises peer review as structured public commentary. Traditional academic validation is hindered by anonymity, latency, and gatekeeping. We propose a transparent, identity-linked, and reproducible system of scholarly evaluation anchored in open commentary. Leveraging blockchain for immutable audit trails and AI for iterative synthesis, we design a framework that incentivises intellectual contribution, captures epistemic evolution, and enables traceable reputational dynamics. This model empowers fields from computational science to the humanities, reframing academic knowledg"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2506.22497","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2506.22497/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2506.22497","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:28:39.605842+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2506.22497v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:28:39.605842+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2506.22497","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:28:39.605842+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"VX7VQLMBWFTS","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:28:39.605842+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"VX7VQLMBWFTSBV4D","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:28:39.605842+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"VX7VQLMB","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:28:39.605842+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/VX7VQLMBWFTSBV4D7R7SYBBIMJ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/VX7VQLMBWFTSBV4D7R7SYBBIMJ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VX7VQLMBWFTSBV4D7R7SYBBIMJ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VX7VQLMBWFTSBV4D7R7SYBBIMJ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/VX7VQLMB"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/VX7VQLMBWFTSBV4D7R7SYBBIMJ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/VX7VQLMBWFTSBV4D7R7SYBBIMJ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/VX7VQLMB","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2506.22497&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VX7VQLMBWFTSBV4D7R7SYBBIMJ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VX7VQLMBWFTSBV4D7R7SYBBIMJ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/VX7VQLMBWFTSBV4D7R7SYBBIMJ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/VX7VQLMBWFTSBV4D7R7SYBBIMJ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/VX7VQLMBWFTSBV4D7R7SYBBIMJ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/VX7VQLMBWFTSBV4D7R7SYBBIMJ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/VX7VQLMBWFTSBV4D7R7SYBBIMJ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:28:39.605842+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:28:39.605842+00:00"}