{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:VXXBB2O24JZ7K64P6L4FSJMVDS","short_pith_number":"pith:VXXBB2O2","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"adee10e9dae273f57b8ff2f85925951cbfbd838d0b80556782f5568d630a2923","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2404.00205","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Conceptual and Unbiased Reasoning in Language Models","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Baolin Peng, Ben Zhou, Dan Roth, Dian Yu, Dong Yu, Hongming Zhang, Hongwei Wang, Sihao Chen","submitted_at":"2024-03-30T00:53:53Z","abstract_excerpt":"Conceptual reasoning, the ability to reason in abstract and high-level perspectives, is key to generalization in human cognition. However, limited study has been done on large language models' capability to perform conceptual reasoning. In this work, we bridge this gap and propose a novel conceptualization framework that forces models to perform conceptual reasoning on abstract questions and generate solutions in a verifiable symbolic space. Using this framework as an analytical tool, we show that existing large language models fall short on conceptual reasoning, dropping 9% to 28% on various "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2404.00205","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-03-30T00:53:53Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"c2fee084f9748be67babfdd8c263b5e3995c341b0607475a95dc8b897ee4706f","abstract_canon_sha256":"6c8ebe8f143f67585a83adfa69972961c855a0000140d13799c22d815528c62e"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:02:29.682254Z","signature_b64":"sRqC2Bw+y7yprC3k0tNLWPWByYgkmcqMqb3qi9gh4WZzG8ERupi3b36KZuSYqzJ/EKivYTZZ+7zekDaAGIevCQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"adee10e9dae273f57b8ff2f85925951cbfbd838d0b80556782f5568d630a2923","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:02:29.681739Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:02:29.681739Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Conceptual and Unbiased Reasoning in Language Models","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Baolin Peng, Ben Zhou, Dan Roth, Dian Yu, Dong Yu, Hongming Zhang, Hongwei Wang, Sihao Chen","submitted_at":"2024-03-30T00:53:53Z","abstract_excerpt":"Conceptual reasoning, the ability to reason in abstract and high-level perspectives, is key to generalization in human cognition. However, limited study has been done on large language models' capability to perform conceptual reasoning. In this work, we bridge this gap and propose a novel conceptualization framework that forces models to perform conceptual reasoning on abstract questions and generate solutions in a verifiable symbolic space. Using this framework as an analytical tool, we show that existing large language models fall short on conceptual reasoning, dropping 9% to 28% on various "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2404.00205","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2404.00205/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2404.00205","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:02:29.681798+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2404.00205v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:02:29.681798+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2404.00205","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:02:29.681798+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"VXXBB2O24JZ7","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:02:29.681798+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"VXXBB2O24JZ7K64P","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:02:29.681798+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"VXXBB2O2","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:02:29.681798+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2509.10746","citing_title":"RECAP: Transparent Inference-Time Emotion Alignment for Medical Dialogue Systems","ref_index":59,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2512.18857","citing_title":"CORE: Concept-Oriented Reinforcement for Bridging the Definition-Application Gap in Mathematical Reasoning","ref_index":24,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/VXXBB2O24JZ7K64P6L4FSJMVDS","json":"https://pith.science/pith/VXXBB2O24JZ7K64P6L4FSJMVDS.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VXXBB2O24JZ7K64P6L4FSJMVDS/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VXXBB2O24JZ7K64P6L4FSJMVDS/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/VXXBB2O2"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/VXXBB2O24JZ7K64P6L4FSJMVDS","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/VXXBB2O24JZ7K64P6L4FSJMVDS.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/VXXBB2O2","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2404.00205&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VXXBB2O24JZ7K64P6L4FSJMVDS/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/VXXBB2O24JZ7K64P6L4FSJMVDS/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/VXXBB2O24JZ7K64P6L4FSJMVDS/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/VXXBB2O24JZ7K64P6L4FSJMVDS/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/VXXBB2O24JZ7K64P6L4FSJMVDS/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/VXXBB2O24JZ7K64P6L4FSJMVDS/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/VXXBB2O24JZ7K64P6L4FSJMVDS/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:02:29.681798+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:02:29.681798+00:00"}