{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:W2LOI73KFFKUKBOC45DI65VPQF","short_pith_number":"pith:W2LOI73K","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"b696e47f6a29554505c2e7468f76af8141b13475058b0b2ffaea9c2385cbf5aa","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2412.20372","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"LLM2: Let Large Language Models Harness System 2 Reasoning","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Bo Shui, Cheng Yang, Chufan Shi, Siheng Li, Wai Lam, Yujiu Yang","submitted_at":"2024-12-29T06:32:36Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language models (LLMs) have exhibited impressive capabilities across a myriad of tasks, yet they occasionally yield undesirable outputs. We posit that these limitations are rooted in the foundational autoregressive architecture of LLMs, which inherently lacks mechanisms for differentiating between desirable and undesirable results. Drawing inspiration from the dual-process theory of human cognition, we introduce LLM2, a novel framework that combines an LLM (System 1) with a process-based verifier (System 2). Within LLM2, the LLM is responsible for generating plausible candidates, while t"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2412.20372","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-12-29T06:32:36Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"706c3fdda43197d82c8315546434f4414a49c9faa371cbb5811050098ccc19ea","abstract_canon_sha256":"6930707fdd05d73413d5a1f6d2ad7bed1dd5f40ca557598359d5c00c8f92c80b"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:21:27.752948Z","signature_b64":"9s2GDfirXV4vTkRZtyHmgLpORZo+p9Nd3ecKo6mbuoVExSXjmW3HStjGT51508qbJpH/3SDAJSkv7ecp6DfmBg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"b696e47f6a29554505c2e7468f76af8141b13475058b0b2ffaea9c2385cbf5aa","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:21:27.752421Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:21:27.752421Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"LLM2: Let Large Language Models Harness System 2 Reasoning","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Bo Shui, Cheng Yang, Chufan Shi, Siheng Li, Wai Lam, Yujiu Yang","submitted_at":"2024-12-29T06:32:36Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language models (LLMs) have exhibited impressive capabilities across a myriad of tasks, yet they occasionally yield undesirable outputs. We posit that these limitations are rooted in the foundational autoregressive architecture of LLMs, which inherently lacks mechanisms for differentiating between desirable and undesirable results. Drawing inspiration from the dual-process theory of human cognition, we introduce LLM2, a novel framework that combines an LLM (System 1) with a process-based verifier (System 2). Within LLM2, the LLM is responsible for generating plausible candidates, while t"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2412.20372","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2412.20372/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2412.20372","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:21:27.752486+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2412.20372v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:21:27.752486+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2412.20372","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:21:27.752486+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"W2LOI73KFFKU","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:21:27.752486+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"W2LOI73KFFKUKBOC","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:21:27.752486+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"W2LOI73K","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:21:27.752486+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.10408","citing_title":"Reasoning RAG via System 1 or System 2: A Survey on Reasoning Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Industry Challenges","ref_index":34,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/W2LOI73KFFKUKBOC45DI65VPQF","json":"https://pith.science/pith/W2LOI73KFFKUKBOC45DI65VPQF.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/W2LOI73KFFKUKBOC45DI65VPQF/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/W2LOI73KFFKUKBOC45DI65VPQF/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/W2LOI73K"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/W2LOI73KFFKUKBOC45DI65VPQF","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/W2LOI73KFFKUKBOC45DI65VPQF.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/W2LOI73K","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2412.20372&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/W2LOI73KFFKUKBOC45DI65VPQF/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/W2LOI73KFFKUKBOC45DI65VPQF/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/W2LOI73KFFKUKBOC45DI65VPQF/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/W2LOI73KFFKUKBOC45DI65VPQF/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/W2LOI73KFFKUKBOC45DI65VPQF/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/W2LOI73KFFKUKBOC45DI65VPQF/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/W2LOI73KFFKUKBOC45DI65VPQF/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:21:27.752486+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:21:27.752486+00:00"}