{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:W3TK2GW3GDMRA64ZDEMZIZFRYT","short_pith_number":"pith:W3TK2GW3","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"b6e6ad1adb30d9107b9919199464b1c4fbab41464338a7f1be1e4050fef6d5c1","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2411.02569","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"The Intersectionality Problem for Algorithmic Fairness","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CY"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Arbie Hsu, Ellen Veomett, Johannes Himmelreich, Kristian Lum","submitted_at":"2024-11-04T20:02:07Z","abstract_excerpt":"A yet unmet challenge in algorithmic fairness is the problem of intersectionality, that is, achieving fairness across the intersection of multiple groups -- and verifying that such fairness has been attained. Because intersectional groups tend to be small, verifying whether a model is fair raises statistical as well as moral-methodological challenges. This paper (1) elucidates the problem of intersectionality in algorithmic fairness, (2) develops desiderata to clarify the challenges underlying the problem and guide the search for potential solutions, (3) illustrates the desiderata and potentia"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2411.02569","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2024-11-04T20:02:07Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.CY"],"title_canon_sha256":"cc6f0de3100ce55fae41a198d4f41137136d1db41992b76062350bd4e89eacaf","abstract_canon_sha256":"7dad0f48101c2b8c9fa9e1b07bbb12a52a4883e30db7b118f0aeaa7c2716474e"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:36:15.906033Z","signature_b64":"fGpG5R7HtY3gUWZfIZSpEZX7NRSXzj33lDEkhLBg7Yairqe6A42jxlrOBSyFRC5aBbUIth8NZGxKop51sOjlDw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"b6e6ad1adb30d9107b9919199464b1c4fbab41464338a7f1be1e4050fef6d5c1","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:36:15.905562Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:36:15.905562Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"The Intersectionality Problem for Algorithmic Fairness","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CY"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Arbie Hsu, Ellen Veomett, Johannes Himmelreich, Kristian Lum","submitted_at":"2024-11-04T20:02:07Z","abstract_excerpt":"A yet unmet challenge in algorithmic fairness is the problem of intersectionality, that is, achieving fairness across the intersection of multiple groups -- and verifying that such fairness has been attained. Because intersectional groups tend to be small, verifying whether a model is fair raises statistical as well as moral-methodological challenges. This paper (1) elucidates the problem of intersectionality in algorithmic fairness, (2) develops desiderata to clarify the challenges underlying the problem and guide the search for potential solutions, (3) illustrates the desiderata and potentia"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2411.02569","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2411.02569/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2411.02569","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:36:15.905623+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2411.02569v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:36:15.905623+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2411.02569","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:36:15.905623+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"W3TK2GW3GDMR","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:36:15.905623+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"W3TK2GW3GDMRA64Z","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:36:15.905623+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"W3TK2GW3","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:36:15.905623+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2603.13452","citing_title":"MESD: A Risk-Sensitive Metric for Explanation Fairness Across Intersectional Subgroups","ref_index":17,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2603.13452","citing_title":"MESD: A Risk-Sensitive Metric for Explanation Fairness Across Intersectional Subgroups","ref_index":17,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.12701","citing_title":"Do Fair Models Reason Fairly? Counterfactual Explanation Consistency for Procedural Fairness in Credit Decisions","ref_index":77,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/W3TK2GW3GDMRA64ZDEMZIZFRYT","json":"https://pith.science/pith/W3TK2GW3GDMRA64ZDEMZIZFRYT.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/W3TK2GW3GDMRA64ZDEMZIZFRYT/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/W3TK2GW3GDMRA64ZDEMZIZFRYT/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/W3TK2GW3"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/W3TK2GW3GDMRA64ZDEMZIZFRYT","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/W3TK2GW3GDMRA64ZDEMZIZFRYT.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/W3TK2GW3","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2411.02569&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/W3TK2GW3GDMRA64ZDEMZIZFRYT/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/W3TK2GW3GDMRA64ZDEMZIZFRYT/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/W3TK2GW3GDMRA64ZDEMZIZFRYT/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/W3TK2GW3GDMRA64ZDEMZIZFRYT/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/W3TK2GW3GDMRA64ZDEMZIZFRYT/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/W3TK2GW3GDMRA64ZDEMZIZFRYT/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/W3TK2GW3GDMRA64ZDEMZIZFRYT/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:36:15.905623+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:36:15.905623+00:00"}