{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:W6YF3ECG6N5V2XNQEEOGIBZRN2","short_pith_number":"pith:W6YF3ECG","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"b7b05d9046f37b5d5db0211c6407316e93565bdf2760ce8d210995339c52ae7e","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2601.11347","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Optimal e-values for testing the mean of a bounded random variable against a composite alternative","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.TH"],"primary_cat":"math.ST","authors_text":"Eugenio Clerico, Sebastian Arnold","submitted_at":"2026-01-16T14:53:15Z","abstract_excerpt":"We derive explicitly the e-values with optimal (relative) growth rate in the worst case for testing the mean of a bounded random variable, thereby providing the first application of the (RE)GROW quality criteria beyond the assumption of mutually absolutely continuous hypotheses for e-values originally proposed by Gr\\\"unwald et al. (2024). For both criteria, we explicitly characterise the alternatives that are most difficult to test against and show that they admit a meaningful interpretation. We give two important examples in which REGROW provides a powerful quality criterion to choose optimal"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2601.11347","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"math.ST","submitted_at":"2026-01-16T14:53:15Z","cross_cats_sorted":["stat.TH"],"title_canon_sha256":"6626c90fd83029cc8b09d5355e9646af7565d762440a2d4bed1aa653309b02d3","abstract_canon_sha256":"5983a1a0b19850446e37067966a708f82fbc38ee292c8bc401bacbe3ef93b85d"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-16T01:22:33.419230Z","signature_b64":"waSvJF801PwkCgSc6kNw53qDzA5e2KcU/r+CYjQUqytMYezLfXAEJkbkUnINxQc3pWQaYnqFeqFK8nkP6R6kDw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"b7b05d9046f37b5d5db0211c6407316e93565bdf2760ce8d210995339c52ae7e","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-16T01:22:33.418296Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-16T01:22:33.418296Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Optimal e-values for testing the mean of a bounded random variable against a composite alternative","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.TH"],"primary_cat":"math.ST","authors_text":"Eugenio Clerico, Sebastian Arnold","submitted_at":"2026-01-16T14:53:15Z","abstract_excerpt":"We derive explicitly the e-values with optimal (relative) growth rate in the worst case for testing the mean of a bounded random variable, thereby providing the first application of the (RE)GROW quality criteria beyond the assumption of mutually absolutely continuous hypotheses for e-values originally proposed by Gr\\\"unwald et al. (2024). For both criteria, we explicitly characterise the alternatives that are most difficult to test against and show that they admit a meaningful interpretation. We give two important examples in which REGROW provides a powerful quality criterion to choose optimal"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2601.11347","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2601.11347/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2601.11347","created_at":"2026-07-16T01:22:33.418749+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2601.11347v2","created_at":"2026-07-16T01:22:33.418749+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2601.11347","created_at":"2026-07-16T01:22:33.418749+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"W6YF3ECG6N5V","created_at":"2026-07-16T01:22:33.418749+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"W6YF3ECG6N5V2XNQ","created_at":"2026-07-16T01:22:33.418749+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"W6YF3ECG","created_at":"2026-07-16T01:22:33.418749+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":5,"internal_anchor_count":5,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.24768","citing_title":"Strong duality for the GROW criterion","ref_index":1,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.29998","citing_title":"Optimal Posterior E-values with Non-Convex Parameter Sets with Applications to Voting Systems","ref_index":16,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.03218","citing_title":"Power one sequential tests exist for weakly compact $\\mathscr P$ against $\\mathscr P^c$","ref_index":2,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.25280","citing_title":"The optimal betting wealth growth rate","ref_index":2,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.21851","citing_title":"Betting on Bets: Anytime-Valid Tests for Stochastic Dominance","ref_index":99,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/W6YF3ECG6N5V2XNQEEOGIBZRN2","json":"https://pith.science/pith/W6YF3ECG6N5V2XNQEEOGIBZRN2.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/W6YF3ECG6N5V2XNQEEOGIBZRN2/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/W6YF3ECG6N5V2XNQEEOGIBZRN2/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/W6YF3ECG"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/W6YF3ECG6N5V2XNQEEOGIBZRN2","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/W6YF3ECG6N5V2XNQEEOGIBZRN2.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/W6YF3ECG","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2601.11347&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/W6YF3ECG6N5V2XNQEEOGIBZRN2/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/W6YF3ECG6N5V2XNQEEOGIBZRN2/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/W6YF3ECG6N5V2XNQEEOGIBZRN2/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/W6YF3ECG6N5V2XNQEEOGIBZRN2/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/W6YF3ECG6N5V2XNQEEOGIBZRN2/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/W6YF3ECG6N5V2XNQEEOGIBZRN2/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/W6YF3ECG6N5V2XNQEEOGIBZRN2/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-16T01:22:33.418749+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-16T01:22:33.418749+00:00"}