{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:W7MMBKR6RFW7MWFTVQI3INRMJL","short_pith_number":"pith:W7MMBKR6","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"b7d8c0aa3e896df658b3ac11b4362c4af97fa21b83369abd871b915912145c73","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2607.27845","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"AutoSupervision: Closing the Feedback Loop in Scientific Workflows with Grounded Revision Verification","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Ben Fei, Eunseo Jung, Fenghua Ling, Feng Liu, Haobo Li, Jiong Wang, Kaiyi Xu, Lei Bai, Wenxiao Zhao, Zijie Guo, Zixin Chen","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T08:24:58Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have enabled AI systems to assist scientific research and peer review. However, an essential capability for reliable AI-assisted scientific workflows remains underexplored: verifying whether reviewer feedback leads to meaningful and evidence-supported manuscript improvements. We introduce AutoSupervision, which evaluates whether scientific manuscript revisions genuinely address reviewer concerns through grounded evidence. AutoSupervision leverages transparent peer-review records as a natural source of supervision, where reviewer comments specify "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2607.27845","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T08:24:58Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"3f2c1693a1053ae12815ef1a32cb8cb9619f0aeb01d8bc20654e3f138f95bc80","abstract_canon_sha256":"f435137ef0ab0a7d16f5eea6fe7248befbc1e2856e2a84931b135b13951bf386"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"b7d8c0aa3e896df658b3ac11b4362c4af97fa21b83369abd871b915912145c73","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-31T01:34:28.014105Z","signature_status":"unsigned_v0","first_computed_at":"2026-07-31T01:34:28.014105Z"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"AutoSupervision: Closing the Feedback Loop in Scientific Workflows with Grounded Revision Verification","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Ben Fei, Eunseo Jung, Fenghua Ling, Feng Liu, Haobo Li, Jiong Wang, Kaiyi Xu, Lei Bai, Wenxiao Zhao, Zijie Guo, Zixin Chen","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T08:24:58Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have enabled AI systems to assist scientific research and peer review. However, an essential capability for reliable AI-assisted scientific workflows remains underexplored: verifying whether reviewer feedback leads to meaningful and evidence-supported manuscript improvements. We introduce AutoSupervision, which evaluates whether scientific manuscript revisions genuinely address reviewer concerns through grounded evidence. AutoSupervision leverages transparent peer-review records as a natural source of supervision, where reviewer comments specify "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2607.27845","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2607.27845/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2607.27845","created_at":"2026-07-31T01:34:28.017363+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2607.27845v1","created_at":"2026-07-31T01:34:28.017363+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2607.27845","created_at":"2026-07-31T01:34:28.017363+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"W7MMBKR6RFW7","created_at":"2026-07-31T01:34:28.017363+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"W7MMBKR6RFW7MWFT","created_at":"2026-07-31T01:34:28.017363+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"W7MMBKR6","created_at":"2026-07-31T01:34:28.017363+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2608.09568","citing_title":"Se-DPO: Self-Evolving Token Credit for Direct Preference Optimization","ref_index":11,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/W7MMBKR6RFW7MWFTVQI3INRMJL","json":"https://pith.science/pith/W7MMBKR6RFW7MWFTVQI3INRMJL.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/W7MMBKR6RFW7MWFTVQI3INRMJL/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/W7MMBKR6RFW7MWFTVQI3INRMJL/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/W7MMBKR6"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/W7MMBKR6RFW7MWFTVQI3INRMJL","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/W7MMBKR6RFW7MWFTVQI3INRMJL.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/W7MMBKR6","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2607.27845&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/W7MMBKR6RFW7MWFTVQI3INRMJL/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/W7MMBKR6RFW7MWFTVQI3INRMJL/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/W7MMBKR6RFW7MWFTVQI3INRMJL/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/W7MMBKR6RFW7MWFTVQI3INRMJL/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/W7MMBKR6RFW7MWFTVQI3INRMJL/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/W7MMBKR6RFW7MWFTVQI3INRMJL/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/W7MMBKR6RFW7MWFTVQI3INRMJL/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-31T01:34:28.017363+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-31T01:34:28.017363+00:00"}