{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:WAXZJ7PUSYGBT3FD6TSUO3MCTU","short_pith_number":"pith:WAXZJ7PU","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"b02f94fdf4960c19eca3f4e5476d829d1a9909cb0ef10ad26604fe229d753fe2","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2310.17037","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Event-by-event Comparison between Machine-Learning- and Transfer-Matrix-based Unfolding Methods","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-ex","hep-ph"],"primary_cat":"physics.data-an","authors_text":"Anja Butter, Bogdan Malaescu, Mathias Backes, Monica Dunford","submitted_at":"2023-10-25T22:28:04Z","abstract_excerpt":"The unfolding of detector effects is a key aspect of comparing experimental data with theoretical predictions. In recent years, different Machine-Learning methods have been developed to provide novel features, e.g. high dimensionality or a probabilistic single-event unfolding based on generative neural networks. Traditionally, many analyses unfold detector effects using transfer-matrix--based algorithms, which are well established in low-dimensional unfolding. They yield an unfolded distribution of the total spectrum, together with its covariance matrix. This paper proposes a method to obtain "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2310.17037","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"physics.data-an","submitted_at":"2023-10-25T22:28:04Z","cross_cats_sorted":["hep-ex","hep-ph"],"title_canon_sha256":"f7fe526d2c4810fc2ab421fdb671ba1e68ad44c217c8a7b8e14f55183e1a1b93","abstract_canon_sha256":"8205f42d6b619291ec32225e787af79f9d57f5dc1b69f74e6b2d902142d39fff"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:49:00.864815Z","signature_b64":"whH7Gvc52c/k0kwf6QS22ZW9ebQjMPVflbI7MWuJ8Xm9YVm3JoGqmHpNcndcx16OdCPqWnltZ7GEpb4ZT8udBw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"b02f94fdf4960c19eca3f4e5476d829d1a9909cb0ef10ad26604fe229d753fe2","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:49:00.864295Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:49:00.864295Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Event-by-event Comparison between Machine-Learning- and Transfer-Matrix-based Unfolding Methods","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-ex","hep-ph"],"primary_cat":"physics.data-an","authors_text":"Anja Butter, Bogdan Malaescu, Mathias Backes, Monica Dunford","submitted_at":"2023-10-25T22:28:04Z","abstract_excerpt":"The unfolding of detector effects is a key aspect of comparing experimental data with theoretical predictions. In recent years, different Machine-Learning methods have been developed to provide novel features, e.g. high dimensionality or a probabilistic single-event unfolding based on generative neural networks. Traditionally, many analyses unfold detector effects using transfer-matrix--based algorithms, which are well established in low-dimensional unfolding. They yield an unfolded distribution of the total spectrum, together with its covariance matrix. This paper proposes a method to obtain "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2310.17037","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2310.17037/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2310.17037","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:49:00.864362+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2310.17037v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:49:00.864362+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2310.17037","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:49:00.864362+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"WAXZJ7PUSYGB","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:49:00.864362+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"WAXZJ7PUSYGBT3FD","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:49:00.864362+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"WAXZJ7PU","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:49:00.864362+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.01354","citing_title":"Local Conformal Predictions for Calibrated Surrogates","ref_index":26,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/WAXZJ7PUSYGBT3FD6TSUO3MCTU","json":"https://pith.science/pith/WAXZJ7PUSYGBT3FD6TSUO3MCTU.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WAXZJ7PUSYGBT3FD6TSUO3MCTU/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WAXZJ7PUSYGBT3FD6TSUO3MCTU/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WAXZJ7PU"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/WAXZJ7PUSYGBT3FD6TSUO3MCTU","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/WAXZJ7PUSYGBT3FD6TSUO3MCTU.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WAXZJ7PU","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2310.17037&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WAXZJ7PUSYGBT3FD6TSUO3MCTU/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WAXZJ7PUSYGBT3FD6TSUO3MCTU/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/WAXZJ7PUSYGBT3FD6TSUO3MCTU/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/WAXZJ7PUSYGBT3FD6TSUO3MCTU/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/WAXZJ7PUSYGBT3FD6TSUO3MCTU/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/WAXZJ7PUSYGBT3FD6TSUO3MCTU/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/WAXZJ7PUSYGBT3FD6TSUO3MCTU/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:49:00.864362+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:49:00.864362+00:00"}