{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:WC5RZM2HR3LPGCAODHOY4L5QUP","short_pith_number":"pith:WC5RZM2H","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"b0bb1cb3478ed6f3080e19dd8e2fb0a3c7ee7eea482ecb8c736bc31f1ff6139e","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2601.05050","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Large language models can effectively convince people to believe conspiracies","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["econ.GN","q-fin.EC"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Adam Gleave, Antonio A. Arechar, David Rand, Gordon Pennycook, Jasper Timm, Jean-Fran\\c{c}ois Godbout, Kellin Pelrine, Matthew Kowal, Thomas H. Costello","submitted_at":"2026-01-08T15:56:05Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language models (LLMs) have been shown to be persuasive across a variety of contexts. But it remains unclear whether this persuasive power advantages accuracy, or if bad actors can just as easily use LLMs to promote misbeliefs. Here, we investigate this question across four experiments in which participants (N = 3996 Americans) discussed a conspiracy theory they were uncertain about with an LLM we instructed to either argue against (\"debunking\") or for (\"bunking\") that conspiracy. Across several frontier models (with standard guardrails but prompted to allow lying), we did not find consi"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2601.05050","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2026-01-08T15:56:05Z","cross_cats_sorted":["econ.GN","q-fin.EC"],"title_canon_sha256":"6ef12c38cb30847cfbb4c57519e74c2a3a22bfc5b1e20f452cceb79de1b04c0a","abstract_canon_sha256":"fda80f9e3163ace17addd5131707272f4912851ecb2dc4cbe1176ee52190082d"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-17T00:20:42.974166Z","signature_b64":"sDoLdZIpxglvrY5tnNjoo9VIOVpTz/CK10DQ/9Qclx3r/NIfAKqftlUuvViJm+rMVgKDnSNWTy5zv6Z2UAW+Dw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"b0bb1cb3478ed6f3080e19dd8e2fb0a3c7ee7eea482ecb8c736bc31f1ff6139e","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-17T00:20:42.973027Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-17T00:20:42.973027Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Large language models can effectively convince people to believe conspiracies","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["econ.GN","q-fin.EC"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Adam Gleave, Antonio A. Arechar, David Rand, Gordon Pennycook, Jasper Timm, Jean-Fran\\c{c}ois Godbout, Kellin Pelrine, Matthew Kowal, Thomas H. Costello","submitted_at":"2026-01-08T15:56:05Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language models (LLMs) have been shown to be persuasive across a variety of contexts. But it remains unclear whether this persuasive power advantages accuracy, or if bad actors can just as easily use LLMs to promote misbeliefs. Here, we investigate this question across four experiments in which participants (N = 3996 Americans) discussed a conspiracy theory they were uncertain about with an LLM we instructed to either argue against (\"debunking\") or for (\"bunking\") that conspiracy. Across several frontier models (with standard guardrails but prompted to allow lying), we did not find consi"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2601.05050","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2601.05050/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2601.05050","created_at":"2026-07-17T00:20:42.973568+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2601.05050v3","created_at":"2026-07-17T00:20:42.973568+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2601.05050","created_at":"2026-07-17T00:20:42.973568+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"WC5RZM2HR3LP","created_at":"2026-07-17T00:20:42.973568+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"WC5RZM2HR3LPGCAO","created_at":"2026-07-17T00:20:42.973568+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"WC5RZM2H","created_at":"2026-07-17T00:20:42.973568+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":2,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.05330","citing_title":"A Model of Multi-turn Human Persuadability Using Probabilistic Belief Tracing","ref_index":23,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.22109","citing_title":"Spontaneous Persuasion: An Audit of Model Persuasiveness in Everyday Conversations","ref_index":3,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/WC5RZM2HR3LPGCAODHOY4L5QUP","json":"https://pith.science/pith/WC5RZM2HR3LPGCAODHOY4L5QUP.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WC5RZM2HR3LPGCAODHOY4L5QUP/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WC5RZM2HR3LPGCAODHOY4L5QUP/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WC5RZM2H"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/WC5RZM2HR3LPGCAODHOY4L5QUP","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/WC5RZM2HR3LPGCAODHOY4L5QUP.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WC5RZM2H","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2601.05050&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WC5RZM2HR3LPGCAODHOY4L5QUP/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WC5RZM2HR3LPGCAODHOY4L5QUP/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/WC5RZM2HR3LPGCAODHOY4L5QUP/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/WC5RZM2HR3LPGCAODHOY4L5QUP/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/WC5RZM2HR3LPGCAODHOY4L5QUP/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/WC5RZM2HR3LPGCAODHOY4L5QUP/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/WC5RZM2HR3LPGCAODHOY4L5QUP/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-17T00:20:42.973568+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-17T00:20:42.973568+00:00"}