{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:WCQH4DAP52STLQWMFZAPTCCRRC","short_pith_number":"pith:WCQH4DAP","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"b0a07e0c0feea535c2cc2e40f9885188bea59160028f2af6090d535d13e8d5cb","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2605.29857","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Feedback-to-Rubrics: Can We Learn Expert Criteria from Inline Comments?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Haruki Goda, Kotaro Yoshida, Ryunosuke Iwai, So Kuroki, Taishi Nakamura, Takuya Akiba, Yuki Imajuku","submitted_at":"2026-05-28T12:38:39Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for writing and review support, but their usefulness depends on context-dependent criteria, such as expert preferences or organization-specific conventions, that are often tacit, undocumented, and difficult to elicit directly. We propose a problem setting for learning reusable natural-language rubrics from accumulated inline comments on artifacts such as human-written or LLM-generated drafts. Our method infers rubrics from these comments and iteratively refines them by observing comment-wise mismatches between rubric-conditioned predictions an"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2605.29857","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2026-05-28T12:38:39Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"497dc43ef7c7471f06178bd617bde7af4b2730fd7b5a226c955e35c1390b50b9","abstract_canon_sha256":"13835c569091fe88e0818efd2055b4cc97138bc2be7dd6fb27434762185e5d54"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-29T02:05:56.316967Z","signature_b64":"4DNd74ByRe6OvlFCfc1Bx9kHRO9RRnMPwd3scF8tgbqRmrvfr1Kf1M8CCIBrSSTb8Pna6iHSJOLx+olQzhk2Bw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"b0a07e0c0feea535c2cc2e40f9885188bea59160028f2af6090d535d13e8d5cb","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-29T02:05:56.316442Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-29T02:05:56.316442Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Feedback-to-Rubrics: Can We Learn Expert Criteria from Inline Comments?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Haruki Goda, Kotaro Yoshida, Ryunosuke Iwai, So Kuroki, Taishi Nakamura, Takuya Akiba, Yuki Imajuku","submitted_at":"2026-05-28T12:38:39Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for writing and review support, but their usefulness depends on context-dependent criteria, such as expert preferences or organization-specific conventions, that are often tacit, undocumented, and difficult to elicit directly. We propose a problem setting for learning reusable natural-language rubrics from accumulated inline comments on artifacts such as human-written or LLM-generated drafts. Our method infers rubrics from these comments and iteratively refines them by observing comment-wise mismatches between rubric-conditioned predictions an"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2605.29857","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2605.29857/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.29857","created_at":"2026-05-29T02:05:56.316527+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.29857v1","created_at":"2026-05-29T02:05:56.316527+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.29857","created_at":"2026-05-29T02:05:56.316527+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"WCQH4DAP52ST","created_at":"2026-05-29T02:05:56.316527+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"WCQH4DAP52STLQWM","created_at":"2026-05-29T02:05:56.316527+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"WCQH4DAP","created_at":"2026-05-29T02:05:56.316527+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/WCQH4DAP52STLQWMFZAPTCCRRC","json":"https://pith.science/pith/WCQH4DAP52STLQWMFZAPTCCRRC.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WCQH4DAP52STLQWMFZAPTCCRRC/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WCQH4DAP52STLQWMFZAPTCCRRC/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WCQH4DAP"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/WCQH4DAP52STLQWMFZAPTCCRRC","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/WCQH4DAP52STLQWMFZAPTCCRRC.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WCQH4DAP","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2605.29857&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WCQH4DAP52STLQWMFZAPTCCRRC/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WCQH4DAP52STLQWMFZAPTCCRRC/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/WCQH4DAP52STLQWMFZAPTCCRRC/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/WCQH4DAP52STLQWMFZAPTCCRRC/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/WCQH4DAP52STLQWMFZAPTCCRRC/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/WCQH4DAP52STLQWMFZAPTCCRRC/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/WCQH4DAP52STLQWMFZAPTCCRRC/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-29T02:05:56.316527+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-29T02:05:56.316527+00:00"}