{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:WFVQUQXY3TT5YQR3B4NPWJAS2P","short_pith_number":"pith:WFVQUQXY","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"b16b0a42f8dce7dc423b0f1afb2412d3d8cf69073cf5f20180b208c1ce6c7dc3","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2211.07671","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Bounding entanglement wedge cross sections","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["quant-ph"],"primary_cat":"hep-th","authors_text":"Matti Jarvinen, Niko Jokela, Parul Jain, Subhash Mahapatra","submitted_at":"2022-11-14T19:00:11Z","abstract_excerpt":"The entanglement wedge cross sections (EWCSs) are postulated as dual gravity probes to certain measures for the entanglement of multiparty systems. We test various proposed inequalities for EWCSs. As it turns out, contrary to expectations, the EWCS is not clearly monogamous nor polygamous for tripartite systems but the results depend on the details and dimensionality of the geometry of the gravity solutions. We propose weaker monogamy relations for dual entanglement measures, which lead to a new lower bound on EWCS. Our work is based on a plethora of gravity backgrounds: pure anti de Sitter sp"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2211.07671","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"hep-th","submitted_at":"2022-11-14T19:00:11Z","cross_cats_sorted":["quant-ph"],"title_canon_sha256":"37969b19f82c587a74921f931d4af5dcd354e8216ee335072fd79aca73591f78","abstract_canon_sha256":"98c90c2b7696c9d8e97756438c0857a01a592c71111fec63165f8dc31a7e1c6d"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T05:52:09.111879Z","signature_b64":"TdpV9gLWex2JCQKgv93U4qiuKvz/8Q2MtUlWmIxo79REfzpF3UyVUEl9ww2u7hDeSKaM/WpJ8kETm1l8Iu9BBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"b16b0a42f8dce7dc423b0f1afb2412d3d8cf69073cf5f20180b208c1ce6c7dc3","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T05:52:09.111355Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T05:52:09.111355Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Bounding entanglement wedge cross sections","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["quant-ph"],"primary_cat":"hep-th","authors_text":"Matti Jarvinen, Niko Jokela, Parul Jain, Subhash Mahapatra","submitted_at":"2022-11-14T19:00:11Z","abstract_excerpt":"The entanglement wedge cross sections (EWCSs) are postulated as dual gravity probes to certain measures for the entanglement of multiparty systems. We test various proposed inequalities for EWCSs. As it turns out, contrary to expectations, the EWCS is not clearly monogamous nor polygamous for tripartite systems but the results depend on the details and dimensionality of the geometry of the gravity solutions. We propose weaker monogamy relations for dual entanglement measures, which lead to a new lower bound on EWCS. Our work is based on a plethora of gravity backgrounds: pure anti de Sitter sp"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2211.07671","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2211.07671/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2211.07671","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:52:09.111407+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2211.07671v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:52:09.111407+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2211.07671","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:52:09.111407+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"WFVQUQXY3TT5","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:52:09.111407+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"WFVQUQXY3TT5YQR3","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:52:09.111407+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"WFVQUQXY","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:52:09.111407+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.00210","citing_title":"Constraints on four-party entanglement in holography","ref_index":11,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.00210","citing_title":"Constraints on four-party entanglement in holography","ref_index":11,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/WFVQUQXY3TT5YQR3B4NPWJAS2P","json":"https://pith.science/pith/WFVQUQXY3TT5YQR3B4NPWJAS2P.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WFVQUQXY3TT5YQR3B4NPWJAS2P/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WFVQUQXY3TT5YQR3B4NPWJAS2P/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WFVQUQXY"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/WFVQUQXY3TT5YQR3B4NPWJAS2P","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/WFVQUQXY3TT5YQR3B4NPWJAS2P.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WFVQUQXY","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2211.07671&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WFVQUQXY3TT5YQR3B4NPWJAS2P/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WFVQUQXY3TT5YQR3B4NPWJAS2P/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/WFVQUQXY3TT5YQR3B4NPWJAS2P/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/WFVQUQXY3TT5YQR3B4NPWJAS2P/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/WFVQUQXY3TT5YQR3B4NPWJAS2P/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/WFVQUQXY3TT5YQR3B4NPWJAS2P/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/WFVQUQXY3TT5YQR3B4NPWJAS2P/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T05:52:09.111407+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T05:52:09.111407+00:00"}