{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:WIKALDWIWHRW2SMATCNTP6UIAF","short_pith_number":"pith:WIKALDWI","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"b214058ec8b1e36d4980989b37fa88017c1056cef06e475a44b26c26ad46286c","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2406.14711","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"MultiAgent Collaboration Attack: Investigating Adversarial Attacks in Large Language Model Collaborations via Debate","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.MA"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Alfonso Amayuelas, Antonis Antoniades, Liangming Pan, Wenyue Hua, William Wang, Xianjun Yang","submitted_at":"2024-06-20T20:09:37Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown exceptional results on current benchmarks when working individually. The advancement in their capabilities, along with a reduction in parameter size and inference times, has facilitated the use of these models as agents, enabling interactions among multiple models to execute complex tasks. Such collaborations offer several advantages, including the use of specialized models (e.g. coding), improved confidence through multiple computations, and enhanced divergent thinking, leading to more diverse outputs. Thus, the collaborative use of language models is e"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2406.14711","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-06-20T20:09:37Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.MA"],"title_canon_sha256":"59be12da564df5d5bd8d49a62b6ec26d27d5d87976a8ad853a2bde86cb08edb4","abstract_canon_sha256":"a7fb02ff13b488dda88134078070459c507b4da4a3dcc457f693e9d6af8cf615"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:37:07.290678Z","signature_b64":"KYKtgc9/opccElIfZ3JNm4yWjf0zz68SGyZ8GZWD9NwvSILLhpo8XYr8SHnYj6cHdw58oy97KqNom7algHxzDw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"b214058ec8b1e36d4980989b37fa88017c1056cef06e475a44b26c26ad46286c","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:37:07.290170Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:37:07.290170Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"MultiAgent Collaboration Attack: Investigating Adversarial Attacks in Large Language Model Collaborations via Debate","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.MA"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Alfonso Amayuelas, Antonis Antoniades, Liangming Pan, Wenyue Hua, William Wang, Xianjun Yang","submitted_at":"2024-06-20T20:09:37Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown exceptional results on current benchmarks when working individually. The advancement in their capabilities, along with a reduction in parameter size and inference times, has facilitated the use of these models as agents, enabling interactions among multiple models to execute complex tasks. Such collaborations offer several advantages, including the use of specialized models (e.g. coding), improved confidence through multiple computations, and enhanced divergent thinking, leading to more diverse outputs. Thus, the collaborative use of language models is e"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2406.14711","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2406.14711/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2406.14711","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:37:07.290233+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2406.14711v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:37:07.290233+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2406.14711","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:37:07.290233+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"WIKALDWIWHRW","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:37:07.290233+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"WIKALDWIWHRW2SMA","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:37:07.290233+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"WIKALDWI","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:37:07.290233+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":4,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.01441","citing_title":"Dive into Ambiguity: A*-Inspired Multi-Agents Commonsense Obfuscation Attack on LLM Prompts","ref_index":2,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.02546","citing_title":"To trust or not to trust: Attention-based Trust Management for LLM Multi-Agent Systems","ref_index":50,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.08268","citing_title":"Insider Attacks in Multi-Agent LLM Consensus Systems","ref_index":234,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.07775","citing_title":"ACIArena: Toward Unified Evaluation for Agent Cascading Injection","ref_index":1,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/WIKALDWIWHRW2SMATCNTP6UIAF","json":"https://pith.science/pith/WIKALDWIWHRW2SMATCNTP6UIAF.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WIKALDWIWHRW2SMATCNTP6UIAF/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WIKALDWIWHRW2SMATCNTP6UIAF/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WIKALDWI"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/WIKALDWIWHRW2SMATCNTP6UIAF","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/WIKALDWIWHRW2SMATCNTP6UIAF.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WIKALDWI","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2406.14711&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WIKALDWIWHRW2SMATCNTP6UIAF/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WIKALDWIWHRW2SMATCNTP6UIAF/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/WIKALDWIWHRW2SMATCNTP6UIAF/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/WIKALDWIWHRW2SMATCNTP6UIAF/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/WIKALDWIWHRW2SMATCNTP6UIAF/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/WIKALDWIWHRW2SMATCNTP6UIAF/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/WIKALDWIWHRW2SMATCNTP6UIAF/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:37:07.290233+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:37:07.290233+00:00"}