{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2017:WKDQTRBMDEMCC3HDDSKKTB6AWI","short_pith_number":"pith:WKDQTRBM","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"b28709c42c1918216ce31c94a987c0b2199857a2b3a7fe4523a21293f66623c3","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1709.04294","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Sterile Neutrinos or Flux Uncertainties? - Status of the Reactor Anti-Neutrino Anomaly","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-ex"],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"\\'Alvaro Hern\\'andez-Cabezudo, Joachim Kopp, Michele Maltoni, Mona Dentler, Thomas Schwetz","submitted_at":"2017-09-13T12:47:57Z","abstract_excerpt":"The $\\sim 3\\sigma$ discrepancy between the predicted and observed reactor anti-neutrino flux, known as the reactor anti-neutrino anomaly, continues to intrigue. The recent discovery of an unexpected bump in the reactor anti-neutrino spectrum, as well as indications that the flux deficit is different for different fission isotopes seems to disfavour the explanation of the anomaly in terms of sterile neutrino oscillations. We critically review this conclusion in view of all available data on electron (anti)neutrino disappearance. We find that the sterile neutrino hypothesis cannot be rejected ba"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1709.04294","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2017-09-13T12:47:57Z","cross_cats_sorted":["hep-ex"],"title_canon_sha256":"fac3755bf627118c3bb1c9698c95be9e3235a0a54cbdf9bb441c8ba765659781","abstract_canon_sha256":"d6992888fa629ce39d39692a09bcd1d822ea4a4bc8d502f32e4377b0c78e0ba9"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:29:51.281789Z","signature_b64":"ll6bvw5WnYzCog304mUe2bLsNXIPwZ+dOHvXGxKtWwf9zQyAzx/yMx+PWWZxkDYIyAkPKhNVk1+5tatAL5sTCA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"b28709c42c1918216ce31c94a987c0b2199857a2b3a7fe4523a21293f66623c3","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:29:51.281205Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:29:51.281205Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Sterile Neutrinos or Flux Uncertainties? - Status of the Reactor Anti-Neutrino Anomaly","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-ex"],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"\\'Alvaro Hern\\'andez-Cabezudo, Joachim Kopp, Michele Maltoni, Mona Dentler, Thomas Schwetz","submitted_at":"2017-09-13T12:47:57Z","abstract_excerpt":"The $\\sim 3\\sigma$ discrepancy between the predicted and observed reactor anti-neutrino flux, known as the reactor anti-neutrino anomaly, continues to intrigue. The recent discovery of an unexpected bump in the reactor anti-neutrino spectrum, as well as indications that the flux deficit is different for different fission isotopes seems to disfavour the explanation of the anomaly in terms of sterile neutrino oscillations. We critically review this conclusion in view of all available data on electron (anti)neutrino disappearance. We find that the sterile neutrino hypothesis cannot be rejected ba"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1709.04294","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1709.04294","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:29:51.281285+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1709.04294v2","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:29:51.281285+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1709.04294","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:29:51.281285+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"WKDQTRBMDEMC","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:53.515858+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"WKDQTRBMDEMCC3HD","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:53.515858+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"WKDQTRBM","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:53.515858+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2006.11237","citing_title":"2020 Global reassessment of the neutrino oscillation picture","ref_index":29,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"1807.06209","citing_title":"Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters","ref_index":104,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/WKDQTRBMDEMCC3HDDSKKTB6AWI","json":"https://pith.science/pith/WKDQTRBMDEMCC3HDDSKKTB6AWI.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WKDQTRBMDEMCC3HDDSKKTB6AWI/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WKDQTRBMDEMCC3HDDSKKTB6AWI/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WKDQTRBM"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/WKDQTRBMDEMCC3HDDSKKTB6AWI","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/WKDQTRBMDEMCC3HDDSKKTB6AWI.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WKDQTRBM","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1709.04294&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WKDQTRBMDEMCC3HDDSKKTB6AWI/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WKDQTRBMDEMCC3HDDSKKTB6AWI/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/WKDQTRBMDEMCC3HDDSKKTB6AWI/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/WKDQTRBMDEMCC3HDDSKKTB6AWI/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/WKDQTRBMDEMCC3HDDSKKTB6AWI/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/WKDQTRBMDEMCC3HDDSKKTB6AWI/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/WKDQTRBMDEMCC3HDDSKKTB6AWI/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:29:51.281285+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:29:51.281285+00:00"}