{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:WKZ2X7LRAH57VAJSBVKMEIMSNQ","short_pith_number":"pith:WKZ2X7LR","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"b2b3abfd7101fbfa81320d54c221926c13dcc284d384dc7edcd2ee7968e35599","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2501.04985","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"SpaLLM-Guard: Pairing SMS Spam Detection Using Open-source and Commercial LLMs","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Mohamed Ali Kaafar, Muhammad Ikram, Muhammad Salman, Nardine Basta","submitted_at":"2025-01-09T06:00:08Z","abstract_excerpt":"The increasing threat of SMS spam, driven by evolving adversarial techniques and concept drift, calls for more robust and adaptive detection methods. In this paper, we evaluate the potential of large language models (LLMs), both open-source and commercial, for SMS spam detection, comparing their performance across zero-shot, few-shot, fine-tuning, and chain-of-thought prompting approaches. Using a comprehensive dataset of SMS messages, we assess the spam detection capabilities of prominent LLMs such as GPT-4, DeepSeek, LLAMA-2, and Mixtral. Our findings reveal that while zero-shot learning pro"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2501.04985","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CR","submitted_at":"2025-01-09T06:00:08Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"cf0fafda62fbd1efe3c382ec75676660c9ae3e1490d594edb7c87f7f5038d2db","abstract_canon_sha256":"9ea22b1d6f92ef57845c3f0c490614fc20ea4a28bbadc52bcb864849e0b487c0"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:58:49.633421Z","signature_b64":"VEzn1lP8qnNbLbNpKV99uQ7eK/mE8wQAvdNLOJ/ggtjdHSoBwyqSZc74zSkZGIyWgGm58dulMEhlU4K+uFsKCw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"b2b3abfd7101fbfa81320d54c221926c13dcc284d384dc7edcd2ee7968e35599","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:58:49.632947Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:58:49.632947Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"SpaLLM-Guard: Pairing SMS Spam Detection Using Open-source and Commercial LLMs","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Mohamed Ali Kaafar, Muhammad Ikram, Muhammad Salman, Nardine Basta","submitted_at":"2025-01-09T06:00:08Z","abstract_excerpt":"The increasing threat of SMS spam, driven by evolving adversarial techniques and concept drift, calls for more robust and adaptive detection methods. In this paper, we evaluate the potential of large language models (LLMs), both open-source and commercial, for SMS spam detection, comparing their performance across zero-shot, few-shot, fine-tuning, and chain-of-thought prompting approaches. Using a comprehensive dataset of SMS messages, we assess the spam detection capabilities of prominent LLMs such as GPT-4, DeepSeek, LLAMA-2, and Mixtral. Our findings reveal that while zero-shot learning pro"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2501.04985","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2501.04985/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2501.04985","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:58:49.633001+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2501.04985v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:58:49.633001+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2501.04985","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:58:49.633001+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"WKZ2X7LRAH57","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:58:49.633001+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"WKZ2X7LRAH57VAJS","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:58:49.633001+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"WKZ2X7LR","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:58:49.633001+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2505.18233","citing_title":"POSTER: A Multi-Signal Model for Detecting Evasive Smishing","ref_index":2025,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/WKZ2X7LRAH57VAJSBVKMEIMSNQ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/WKZ2X7LRAH57VAJSBVKMEIMSNQ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WKZ2X7LRAH57VAJSBVKMEIMSNQ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WKZ2X7LRAH57VAJSBVKMEIMSNQ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WKZ2X7LR"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/WKZ2X7LRAH57VAJSBVKMEIMSNQ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/WKZ2X7LRAH57VAJSBVKMEIMSNQ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WKZ2X7LR","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2501.04985&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WKZ2X7LRAH57VAJSBVKMEIMSNQ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WKZ2X7LRAH57VAJSBVKMEIMSNQ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/WKZ2X7LRAH57VAJSBVKMEIMSNQ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/WKZ2X7LRAH57VAJSBVKMEIMSNQ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/WKZ2X7LRAH57VAJSBVKMEIMSNQ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/WKZ2X7LRAH57VAJSBVKMEIMSNQ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/WKZ2X7LRAH57VAJSBVKMEIMSNQ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:58:49.633001+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:58:49.633001+00:00"}