{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2019:WMGZTNA2ZN3FUINXQROZS6GQYN","short_pith_number":"pith:WMGZTNA2","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"b30d99b41acb765a21b7845d9978d0c37428e98ae75e46087edb27507a534f50","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1907.06770","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Increasing Power for Observational Studies of Aberrant Response: An Adaptive Approach","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Colin B. Fogarty, Dylan S. Small, Hyunseung Kang, Siyu Heng","submitted_at":"2019-07-15T22:07:52Z","abstract_excerpt":"In many observational studies, the interest is in the effect of treatment on bad, aberrant outcomes rather than the average outcome. For such settings, the traditional approach is to define a dichotomous outcome indicating aberration from a continuous score and use the Mantel-Haenszel test with matched data. For example, studies of determinants of poor child growth use the World Health Organization's definition of child stunting being height-for-age z-score $\\leq -2$. The traditional approach may lose power because it discards potentially useful information about the severity of aberration. We"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1907.06770","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2019-07-15T22:07:52Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"817f62d03d40016827caca3aed3d94329263a6b98d452bc3aefbae7cd95fc22b","abstract_canon_sha256":"9ae0d776a65d37d33ff961ee34dd393bd447c69553fd0464cfca479b882b4dae"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T01:43:04.623530Z","signature_b64":"yih77ejMvMZFJG+KOm4I91Gy9S661XKR3m/bJ9G/IMymvOp4Lqyfj3wxk3v2emHc+PKM7v3q/N8g2iiZzWy6DQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"b30d99b41acb765a21b7845d9978d0c37428e98ae75e46087edb27507a534f50","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T01:43:04.623091Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T01:43:04.623091Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Increasing Power for Observational Studies of Aberrant Response: An Adaptive Approach","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Colin B. Fogarty, Dylan S. Small, Hyunseung Kang, Siyu Heng","submitted_at":"2019-07-15T22:07:52Z","abstract_excerpt":"In many observational studies, the interest is in the effect of treatment on bad, aberrant outcomes rather than the average outcome. For such settings, the traditional approach is to define a dichotomous outcome indicating aberration from a continuous score and use the Mantel-Haenszel test with matched data. For example, studies of determinants of poor child growth use the World Health Organization's definition of child stunting being height-for-age z-score $\\leq -2$. The traditional approach may lose power because it discards potentially useful information about the severity of aberration. We"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1907.06770","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/1907.06770/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1907.06770","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:43:04.623149+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1907.06770v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:43:04.623149+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1907.06770","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:43:04.623149+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"WMGZTNA2ZN3F","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:43:04.623149+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"WMGZTNA2ZN3FUINX","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:43:04.623149+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"WMGZTNA2","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:43:04.623149+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.06874","citing_title":"Gaussian comparison above the median","ref_index":122,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.05120","citing_title":"Stochastic Sensitivity Analysis for Matched Observational Studies","ref_index":121,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/WMGZTNA2ZN3FUINXQROZS6GQYN","json":"https://pith.science/pith/WMGZTNA2ZN3FUINXQROZS6GQYN.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WMGZTNA2ZN3FUINXQROZS6GQYN/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WMGZTNA2ZN3FUINXQROZS6GQYN/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WMGZTNA2"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/WMGZTNA2ZN3FUINXQROZS6GQYN","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/WMGZTNA2ZN3FUINXQROZS6GQYN.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WMGZTNA2","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1907.06770&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WMGZTNA2ZN3FUINXQROZS6GQYN/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WMGZTNA2ZN3FUINXQROZS6GQYN/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/WMGZTNA2ZN3FUINXQROZS6GQYN/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/WMGZTNA2ZN3FUINXQROZS6GQYN/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/WMGZTNA2ZN3FUINXQROZS6GQYN/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/WMGZTNA2ZN3FUINXQROZS6GQYN/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/WMGZTNA2ZN3FUINXQROZS6GQYN/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T01:43:04.623149+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T01:43:04.623149+00:00"}