{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2018:WN5QNL3DB5YQJHFIVDJNC625EN","short_pith_number":"pith:WN5QNL3D","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"b37b06af630f71049ca8a8d2d17b5d23517bd2bdf2c7dbac727b9f805e37b509","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1809.00883","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Assessment and support of emerging research groups","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.DL","authors_text":"Henk F. Moed","submitted_at":"2018-09-04T10:47:24Z","abstract_excerpt":"The starting point of this paper is a desktop research assessment model that does not take properly into account the complexities of research assessment, but rather bases itself on a series of highly simplifying, questionable assumptions related to the availability, validity and evaluative significance of research performance indicators, and to funding policy criteria. The paper presents a critique of this model, and proposes alternative assessment approaches, based on an explicit evaluative framework, focusing on preconditions to performance or communication effectiveness rather than on perfo"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1809.00883","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.DL","submitted_at":"2018-09-04T10:47:24Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"ea15495f388e3cb7646faae71a7a79c639c0476f49af530fe0d26fffc40cdc54","abstract_canon_sha256":"7108f88e70228a1adf5e9a5060796e8337190c088e81b3bb1ee9ce42dbde893a"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:06:32.242839Z","signature_b64":"njQEgExY0kWox7mlo3z+qX2ZMq5v400EbmX8JcqWi96DKhszB66xYtcZiBmntu5+Nn3hbG7qIQE63eNnkit7Aw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"b37b06af630f71049ca8a8d2d17b5d23517bd2bdf2c7dbac727b9f805e37b509","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:06:32.242386Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:06:32.242386Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Assessment and support of emerging research groups","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.DL","authors_text":"Henk F. Moed","submitted_at":"2018-09-04T10:47:24Z","abstract_excerpt":"The starting point of this paper is a desktop research assessment model that does not take properly into account the complexities of research assessment, but rather bases itself on a series of highly simplifying, questionable assumptions related to the availability, validity and evaluative significance of research performance indicators, and to funding policy criteria. The paper presents a critique of this model, and proposes alternative assessment approaches, based on an explicit evaluative framework, focusing on preconditions to performance or communication effectiveness rather than on perfo"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1809.00883","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1809.00883","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:06:32.242455+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1809.00883v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:06:32.242455+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1809.00883","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:06:32.242455+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"WN5QNL3DB5YQ","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:01.666342+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"WN5QNL3DB5YQJHFI","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:01.666342+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"WN5QNL3D","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:01.666342+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/WN5QNL3DB5YQJHFIVDJNC625EN","json":"https://pith.science/pith/WN5QNL3DB5YQJHFIVDJNC625EN.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WN5QNL3DB5YQJHFIVDJNC625EN/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WN5QNL3DB5YQJHFIVDJNC625EN/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WN5QNL3D"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/WN5QNL3DB5YQJHFIVDJNC625EN","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/WN5QNL3DB5YQJHFIVDJNC625EN.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WN5QNL3D","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1809.00883&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WN5QNL3DB5YQJHFIVDJNC625EN/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WN5QNL3DB5YQJHFIVDJNC625EN/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/WN5QNL3DB5YQJHFIVDJNC625EN/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/WN5QNL3DB5YQJHFIVDJNC625EN/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/WN5QNL3DB5YQJHFIVDJNC625EN/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/WN5QNL3DB5YQJHFIVDJNC625EN/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/WN5QNL3DB5YQJHFIVDJNC625EN/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:06:32.242455+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:06:32.242455+00:00"}