{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:WNNO7AGHRMREIUUG2W5D7R75NY","short_pith_number":"pith:WNNO7AGH","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"b35aef80c78b22445286d5ba3fc7fd6e39cd58a11ed886e31fa7b8dc2f2727de","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2311.09497","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Peer Reviews of Peer Reviews: A Randomized Controlled Trial and Other Experiments","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.GT"],"primary_cat":"cs.DL","authors_text":"Alekh Agarwal, Alexander Goldberg, Alice Oh, Danielle Belgrave, Ivan Stelmakh, Kyunghyun Cho, Nihar B. Shah","submitted_at":"2023-11-16T01:40:07Z","abstract_excerpt":"Is it possible to reliably evaluate the quality of peer reviews? We study this question driven by two primary motivations -- incentivizing high-quality reviewing using assessed quality of reviews and measuring changes to review quality in experiments. We conduct a large scale study at the NeurIPS 2022 conference, a top-tier conference in machine learning, in which we invited (meta)-reviewers and authors to evaluate reviews given to submitted papers. First, we conduct a RCT to examine bias due to the length of reviews. We generate elongated versions of reviews by adding substantial amounts of n"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2311.09497","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.DL","submitted_at":"2023-11-16T01:40:07Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.GT"],"title_canon_sha256":"8f05c81a31c25c295c466dc380605fcf64426c7b90b5d1b3f7c5f91a7c3802de","abstract_canon_sha256":"a5a99aeb6a028d6b718879eb4eb3465048818414bb49a56af32280433a9ea69e"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:32:04.183806Z","signature_b64":"vDyfXiTxyGJMbw3grwdzhJz3cXkpdG1mrXoNWpQrS3FBV27lhsLYN2gtlQ3hgoRfy6gn5i/cdLVr7vv/DIkzDw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"b35aef80c78b22445286d5ba3fc7fd6e39cd58a11ed886e31fa7b8dc2f2727de","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:32:04.183249Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:32:04.183249Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Peer Reviews of Peer Reviews: A Randomized Controlled Trial and Other Experiments","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.GT"],"primary_cat":"cs.DL","authors_text":"Alekh Agarwal, Alexander Goldberg, Alice Oh, Danielle Belgrave, Ivan Stelmakh, Kyunghyun Cho, Nihar B. Shah","submitted_at":"2023-11-16T01:40:07Z","abstract_excerpt":"Is it possible to reliably evaluate the quality of peer reviews? We study this question driven by two primary motivations -- incentivizing high-quality reviewing using assessed quality of reviews and measuring changes to review quality in experiments. We conduct a large scale study at the NeurIPS 2022 conference, a top-tier conference in machine learning, in which we invited (meta)-reviewers and authors to evaluate reviews given to submitted papers. First, we conduct a RCT to examine bias due to the length of reviews. We generate elongated versions of reviews by adding substantial amounts of n"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2311.09497","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2311.09497/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2311.09497","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:32:04.183305+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2311.09497v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:32:04.183305+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2311.09497","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:32:04.183305+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"WNNO7AGHRMRE","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:32:04.183305+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"WNNO7AGHRMREIUUG","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:32:04.183305+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"WNNO7AGH","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:32:04.183305+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2608.05438","citing_title":"A Vision for the Future of an AI-Integrated Research Ecosystem","ref_index":11,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/WNNO7AGHRMREIUUG2W5D7R75NY","json":"https://pith.science/pith/WNNO7AGHRMREIUUG2W5D7R75NY.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WNNO7AGHRMREIUUG2W5D7R75NY/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WNNO7AGHRMREIUUG2W5D7R75NY/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WNNO7AGH"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/WNNO7AGHRMREIUUG2W5D7R75NY","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/WNNO7AGHRMREIUUG2W5D7R75NY.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WNNO7AGH","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2311.09497&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WNNO7AGHRMREIUUG2W5D7R75NY/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WNNO7AGHRMREIUUG2W5D7R75NY/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/WNNO7AGHRMREIUUG2W5D7R75NY/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/WNNO7AGHRMREIUUG2W5D7R75NY/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/WNNO7AGHRMREIUUG2W5D7R75NY/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/WNNO7AGHRMREIUUG2W5D7R75NY/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/WNNO7AGHRMREIUUG2W5D7R75NY/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:32:04.183305+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:32:04.183305+00:00"}