{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:WP2UFMCHWRXC5DTQPPQOSXPRLQ","short_pith_number":"pith:WP2UFMCH","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"b3f542b047b46e2e8e707be0e95df15c005a75332b47a5e853bc0c226f53800a","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2303.12687","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"On Weighted Orthogonal Learners for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Johan Decruyenaere, Pawel Morzywolek, Stijn Vansteelandt","submitted_at":"2023-03-22T16:35:19Z","abstract_excerpt":"Motivated by applications in personalized medicine and individualized policymaking, there is a growing interest in techniques for quantifying treatment effect heterogeneity in terms of the conditional average treatment effect (CATE). Some of the most prominent methods for CATE estimation developed in recent years are T-Learner, DR-Learner and R-Learner. The latter two were designed to improve on the former by being Neyman-orthogonal. However, the relations between them remain unclear, and likewise the literature remains vague on whether these learners converge to a useful quantity or (function"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2303.12687","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2023-03-22T16:35:19Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"481499c6db295f78c71c5dce2cbc426916765ad330a5c1961102a0d7997d2624","abstract_canon_sha256":"d193bbfb7290bdb5a3635b4066a12768dd56fe497f175f9abadbe67e4edabfe9"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:25:48.281091Z","signature_b64":"Cyum/ZRK2wPxpSuTieZcZ8WiNtkYsKBmP6BtRv7qBNHuCIqEtHmoQa5ddcZ7iCoLokXnxrOKCUgRUNZcZHy+Cw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"b3f542b047b46e2e8e707be0e95df15c005a75332b47a5e853bc0c226f53800a","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:25:48.280723Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:25:48.280723Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"On Weighted Orthogonal Learners for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Johan Decruyenaere, Pawel Morzywolek, Stijn Vansteelandt","submitted_at":"2023-03-22T16:35:19Z","abstract_excerpt":"Motivated by applications in personalized medicine and individualized policymaking, there is a growing interest in techniques for quantifying treatment effect heterogeneity in terms of the conditional average treatment effect (CATE). Some of the most prominent methods for CATE estimation developed in recent years are T-Learner, DR-Learner and R-Learner. The latter two were designed to improve on the former by being Neyman-orthogonal. However, the relations between them remain unclear, and likewise the literature remains vague on whether these learners converge to a useful quantity or (function"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2303.12687","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2303.12687/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2303.12687","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:25:48.280788+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2303.12687v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:25:48.280788+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2303.12687","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:25:48.280788+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"WP2UFMCHWRXC","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:25:48.280788+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"WP2UFMCHWRXC5DTQ","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:25:48.280788+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"WP2UFMCH","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:25:48.280788+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":6,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2502.04274","citing_title":"Orthogonal Representation Learning for Estimating Causal Quantities","ref_index":53,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.15483","citing_title":"Improving the Efficiency of Subgroup Analysis in Randomized Controlled Trials with TMLE","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2507.20993","citing_title":"Annotation-Assisted Learning of Treatment Policies From Multimodal Electronic Health Records","ref_index":28,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2602.04611","citing_title":"Targeted Synthetic Control Method","ref_index":10,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.19296","citing_title":"Debiased neural operators for estimating functionals","ref_index":44,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.10412","citing_title":"Orthogonal machine learning for conditional odds and risk ratios","ref_index":23,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/WP2UFMCHWRXC5DTQPPQOSXPRLQ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/WP2UFMCHWRXC5DTQPPQOSXPRLQ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WP2UFMCHWRXC5DTQPPQOSXPRLQ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WP2UFMCHWRXC5DTQPPQOSXPRLQ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WP2UFMCH"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/WP2UFMCHWRXC5DTQPPQOSXPRLQ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/WP2UFMCHWRXC5DTQPPQOSXPRLQ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WP2UFMCH","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2303.12687&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WP2UFMCHWRXC5DTQPPQOSXPRLQ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WP2UFMCHWRXC5DTQPPQOSXPRLQ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/WP2UFMCHWRXC5DTQPPQOSXPRLQ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/WP2UFMCHWRXC5DTQPPQOSXPRLQ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/WP2UFMCHWRXC5DTQPPQOSXPRLQ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/WP2UFMCHWRXC5DTQPPQOSXPRLQ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/WP2UFMCHWRXC5DTQPPQOSXPRLQ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:25:48.280788+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:25:48.280788+00:00"}