{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2016:WPH7D32UMAXRPWRCIMM7VSNGKF","short_pith_number":"pith:WPH7D32U","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"b3cff1ef54602f17da224319fac9a65166d108cb0d703d79950626aedaa09b22","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1604.03114","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Conversational flow in Oxford-style debates","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.SI","physics.soc-ph","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, Justine Zhang, Ravi Kumar, Sujith Ravi","submitted_at":"2016-04-11T20:00:04Z","abstract_excerpt":"Public debates are a common platform for presenting and juxtaposing diverging views on important issues. In this work we propose a methodology for tracking how ideas flow between participants throughout a debate. We use this approach in a case study of Oxford-style debates---a competitive format where the winner is determined by audience votes---and show how the outcome of a debate depends on aspects of conversational flow. In particular, we find that winners tend to make better use of a debate's interactive component than losers, by actively pursuing their opponents' points rather than promot"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1604.03114","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2016-04-11T20:00:04Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.SI","physics.soc-ph","stat.ML"],"title_canon_sha256":"e7c329a247d89ab3fa748ad8c8d2aec9d03e409569f015b2ef1c8997ec89e4a9","abstract_canon_sha256":"ae184874c314b095df8c65bdcf60a8994e09e33d366f88666aa86191e827dd69"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T01:17:16.432578Z","signature_b64":"7vnKPANK2pw2YOz3+zOkFOR7pp1vLVmfGbZZx7PdbgJSM204afqKXjSLh1XwYnJPR/La0hwA/a/i8s3Zxi0JCQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"b3cff1ef54602f17da224319fac9a65166d108cb0d703d79950626aedaa09b22","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T01:17:16.431729Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T01:17:16.431729Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Conversational flow in Oxford-style debates","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.SI","physics.soc-ph","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, Justine Zhang, Ravi Kumar, Sujith Ravi","submitted_at":"2016-04-11T20:00:04Z","abstract_excerpt":"Public debates are a common platform for presenting and juxtaposing diverging views on important issues. In this work we propose a methodology for tracking how ideas flow between participants throughout a debate. We use this approach in a case study of Oxford-style debates---a competitive format where the winner is determined by audience votes---and show how the outcome of a debate depends on aspects of conversational flow. In particular, we find that winners tend to make better use of a debate's interactive component than losers, by actively pursuing their opponents' points rather than promot"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1604.03114","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1604.03114","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:17:16.431892+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1604.03114v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:17:16.431892+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1604.03114","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:17:16.431892+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"WPH7D32UMAXR","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:51.357362+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"WPH7D32UMAXRPWRC","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:51.357362+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"WPH7D32U","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:51.357362+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2211.10764","citing_title":"The Power of Social Norms: How Initial Responses to Toxicity Shape Conversations on Twitter","ref_index":61,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/WPH7D32UMAXRPWRCIMM7VSNGKF","json":"https://pith.science/pith/WPH7D32UMAXRPWRCIMM7VSNGKF.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WPH7D32UMAXRPWRCIMM7VSNGKF/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WPH7D32UMAXRPWRCIMM7VSNGKF/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WPH7D32U"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/WPH7D32UMAXRPWRCIMM7VSNGKF","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/WPH7D32UMAXRPWRCIMM7VSNGKF.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WPH7D32U","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1604.03114&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WPH7D32UMAXRPWRCIMM7VSNGKF/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WPH7D32UMAXRPWRCIMM7VSNGKF/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/WPH7D32UMAXRPWRCIMM7VSNGKF/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/WPH7D32UMAXRPWRCIMM7VSNGKF/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/WPH7D32UMAXRPWRCIMM7VSNGKF/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/WPH7D32UMAXRPWRCIMM7VSNGKF/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/WPH7D32UMAXRPWRCIMM7VSNGKF/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T01:17:16.431892+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T01:17:16.431892+00:00"}