{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:WPRYZOHOL2MEAJD3OUSQRUXCGA","short_pith_number":"pith:WPRYZOHO","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"b3e38cb8ee5e9840247b752508d2e2302e8cbff335b0a53cc67d9a0100913626","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2305.11812","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Off-policy evaluation beyond overlap: partial identification through smoothness","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["math.ST","stat.TH"],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Johan Ugander, Martin Saveski, Samir Khan","submitted_at":"2023-05-19T16:48:04Z","abstract_excerpt":"Off-policy evaluation (OPE) is the problem of estimating the value of a target policy using historical data collected under a different logging policy. OPE methods typically assume overlap between the target and logging policy, enabling solutions based on importance weighting and/or imputation. In this work, we approach OPE without assuming either overlap or a well-specified model by considering a strategy based on partial identification under non-parametric assumptions on the conditional mean function, focusing especially on Lipschitz smoothness. Under such smoothness assumptions, we formulat"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2305.11812","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2023-05-19T16:48:04Z","cross_cats_sorted":["math.ST","stat.TH"],"title_canon_sha256":"4edb2b6c5f098d61f4524736c37e2311af53175b9ae9e3a60ba07415cad5edc8","abstract_canon_sha256":"fc6476f22a8c0474b4b4c35da81e30eff2ccfc688d13e3c883d9c62af2eee099"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T07:54:00.841914Z","signature_b64":"GYx77179tpOWpWhOReddxh/vshz0bHEdcCYzIAMVJKu+CNOaPo2JZiAYb+Huu9Ofi/qfFF8ykdBVdyyCmtzAAQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"b3e38cb8ee5e9840247b752508d2e2302e8cbff335b0a53cc67d9a0100913626","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T07:54:00.841502Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T07:54:00.841502Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Off-policy evaluation beyond overlap: partial identification through smoothness","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["math.ST","stat.TH"],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Johan Ugander, Martin Saveski, Samir Khan","submitted_at":"2023-05-19T16:48:04Z","abstract_excerpt":"Off-policy evaluation (OPE) is the problem of estimating the value of a target policy using historical data collected under a different logging policy. OPE methods typically assume overlap between the target and logging policy, enabling solutions based on importance weighting and/or imputation. In this work, we approach OPE without assuming either overlap or a well-specified model by considering a strategy based on partial identification under non-parametric assumptions on the conditional mean function, focusing especially on Lipschitz smoothness. Under such smoothness assumptions, we formulat"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2305.11812","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2305.11812/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2305.11812","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:54:00.841560+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2305.11812v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:54:00.841560+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2305.11812","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:54:00.841560+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"WPRYZOHOL2ME","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:54:00.841560+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"WPRYZOHOL2MEAJD3","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:54:00.841560+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"WPRYZOHO","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:54:00.841560+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":4,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.21050","citing_title":"Triage Score: A Counterfactual Risk Assessment Instrument","ref_index":32,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.19117","citing_title":"Wasserstein Policy Learning for Distributional Outcomes","ref_index":18,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.15108","citing_title":"Logging Policy Design for Off-Policy Evaluation","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.15108","citing_title":"Logging Policy Design for Off-Policy Evaluation","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/WPRYZOHOL2MEAJD3OUSQRUXCGA","json":"https://pith.science/pith/WPRYZOHOL2MEAJD3OUSQRUXCGA.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WPRYZOHOL2MEAJD3OUSQRUXCGA/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WPRYZOHOL2MEAJD3OUSQRUXCGA/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WPRYZOHO"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/WPRYZOHOL2MEAJD3OUSQRUXCGA","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/WPRYZOHOL2MEAJD3OUSQRUXCGA.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WPRYZOHO","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2305.11812&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WPRYZOHOL2MEAJD3OUSQRUXCGA/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WPRYZOHOL2MEAJD3OUSQRUXCGA/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/WPRYZOHOL2MEAJD3OUSQRUXCGA/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/WPRYZOHOL2MEAJD3OUSQRUXCGA/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/WPRYZOHOL2MEAJD3OUSQRUXCGA/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/WPRYZOHOL2MEAJD3OUSQRUXCGA/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/WPRYZOHOL2MEAJD3OUSQRUXCGA/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T07:54:00.841560+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T07:54:00.841560+00:00"}