{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:WPS5C5DIKHCB4S2PCEZCL72KLI","short_pith_number":"pith:WPS5C5DI","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"b3e5d1746851c41e4b4f113225ff4a5a250699b33e9b8e71c1a1e106f5c0544d","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2209.13275","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Does quantum mechanics require \"conspiracy\"?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["physics.hist-ph"],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Ovidiu Cristinel Stoica","submitted_at":"2022-09-27T09:40:58Z","abstract_excerpt":"Quantum states containing records of incompatible outcomes of quantum measurements are valid states in the tensor-product Hilbert space. Since they contain false records, they conflict with the Born rule and with our observations. I show that excluding them requires a fine-tuning to an extremely restricted subspace of the Hilbert space that seems \"conspiratorial\", in the sense that (1) it seems to depend on future events that involve records (including measurement settings) and on the dynamical law (normally thought to be independent of the initial conditions), and (2) it violates Statistical "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2209.13275","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2022-09-27T09:40:58Z","cross_cats_sorted":["physics.hist-ph"],"title_canon_sha256":"d9c12d42be443091a3c8f48ed8c25ae14fe53a27a4f46d3c3794d205dcf7ea10","abstract_canon_sha256":"801f48f180f2e881024d4ec696dc2aa352a8fbdb2ededc056b9ff2250d4feab1"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:17:55.131387Z","signature_b64":"Rm+Z7fzFis40vfZTsA/ZRoSLjN7MoZOEXGZElNxm9Nb20xZh/dk9vVuwNk+/RpGuMCkQc2bCbNdtngcu5lKgAg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"b3e5d1746851c41e4b4f113225ff4a5a250699b33e9b8e71c1a1e106f5c0544d","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:17:55.130964Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:17:55.130964Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Does quantum mechanics require \"conspiracy\"?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["physics.hist-ph"],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Ovidiu Cristinel Stoica","submitted_at":"2022-09-27T09:40:58Z","abstract_excerpt":"Quantum states containing records of incompatible outcomes of quantum measurements are valid states in the tensor-product Hilbert space. Since they contain false records, they conflict with the Born rule and with our observations. I show that excluding them requires a fine-tuning to an extremely restricted subspace of the Hilbert space that seems \"conspiratorial\", in the sense that (1) it seems to depend on future events that involve records (including measurement settings) and on the dynamical law (normally thought to be independent of the initial conditions), and (2) it violates Statistical "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2209.13275","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2209.13275/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2209.13275","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:17:55.131012+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2209.13275v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:17:55.131012+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2209.13275","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:17:55.131012+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"WPS5C5DIKHCB","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:17:55.131012+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"WPS5C5DIKHCB4S2P","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:17:55.131012+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"WPS5C5DI","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:17:55.131012+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2412.09669","citing_title":"Observation as Physication. A single-world unitary no-conspiracy interpretation of quantum mechanics","ref_index":54,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/WPS5C5DIKHCB4S2PCEZCL72KLI","json":"https://pith.science/pith/WPS5C5DIKHCB4S2PCEZCL72KLI.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WPS5C5DIKHCB4S2PCEZCL72KLI/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WPS5C5DIKHCB4S2PCEZCL72KLI/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WPS5C5DI"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/WPS5C5DIKHCB4S2PCEZCL72KLI","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/WPS5C5DIKHCB4S2PCEZCL72KLI.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WPS5C5DI","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2209.13275&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WPS5C5DIKHCB4S2PCEZCL72KLI/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WPS5C5DIKHCB4S2PCEZCL72KLI/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/WPS5C5DIKHCB4S2PCEZCL72KLI/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/WPS5C5DIKHCB4S2PCEZCL72KLI/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/WPS5C5DIKHCB4S2PCEZCL72KLI/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/WPS5C5DIKHCB4S2PCEZCL72KLI/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/WPS5C5DIKHCB4S2PCEZCL72KLI/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:17:55.131012+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:17:55.131012+00:00"}