{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:WQ53TLBZWFXZPFKDIFARAINWLG","short_pith_number":"pith:WQ53TLBZ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"b43bb9ac39b16f97954341411021b659bee8671b341de17bc2c07fdaead86561","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2502.04909","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Benchmarking Quantum Reinforcement Learning","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Andreas Rosskopf, Georg Kruse, Jeanette Miriam Lorenz, Robert Wille, Rodrigo Coelho","submitted_at":"2025-02-07T13:28:20Z","abstract_excerpt":"Quantum Reinforcement Learning (QRL) has emerged as a promising research field, leveraging the principles of quantum mechanics to enhance the performance of reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms. However, despite its growing interest, QRL still faces significant challenges. It is still uncertain if QRL can show any advantage over classical RL beyond artificial problem formulations. Additionally, it is not yet clear which streams of QRL research show the greatest potential. The lack of a unified benchmark and the need to evaluate the reliance on quantum principles of QRL approaches are pressin"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2502.04909","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2025-02-07T13:28:20Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"683b61bf8f85ac4497d5056bc394b03c579790975baf586d843ad9b0b85c7e7b","abstract_canon_sha256":"483a99218f5622bafd8c53d47da3ea267bd0882bb341ea694dc8bfb0d22ce1c6"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:35:45.946107Z","signature_b64":"kmMzcWPwHuvFBEuEMTiL/hET0keHcR4jpBSwdmaPzW38tCkcnE9ZGwFHoGOjKyxE/BugrhZXJK0IeENi8AyFCQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"b43bb9ac39b16f97954341411021b659bee8671b341de17bc2c07fdaead86561","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:35:45.945462Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:35:45.945462Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Benchmarking Quantum Reinforcement Learning","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Andreas Rosskopf, Georg Kruse, Jeanette Miriam Lorenz, Robert Wille, Rodrigo Coelho","submitted_at":"2025-02-07T13:28:20Z","abstract_excerpt":"Quantum Reinforcement Learning (QRL) has emerged as a promising research field, leveraging the principles of quantum mechanics to enhance the performance of reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms. However, despite its growing interest, QRL still faces significant challenges. It is still uncertain if QRL can show any advantage over classical RL beyond artificial problem formulations. Additionally, it is not yet clear which streams of QRL research show the greatest potential. The lack of a unified benchmark and the need to evaluate the reliance on quantum principles of QRL approaches are pressin"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2502.04909","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2502.04909/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2502.04909","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:35:45.945528+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2502.04909v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:35:45.945528+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2502.04909","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:35:45.945528+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"WQ53TLBZWFXZ","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:35:45.945528+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"WQ53TLBZWFXZPFKD","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:35:45.945528+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"WQ53TLBZ","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:35:45.945528+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.01197","citing_title":"Quantum vs. Classical Machine Learning: A Unified Empirical Comparison","ref_index":13,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.01197","citing_title":"Quantum vs. Classical Machine Learning: A Unified Empirical Comparison","ref_index":13,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/WQ53TLBZWFXZPFKDIFARAINWLG","json":"https://pith.science/pith/WQ53TLBZWFXZPFKDIFARAINWLG.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WQ53TLBZWFXZPFKDIFARAINWLG/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WQ53TLBZWFXZPFKDIFARAINWLG/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WQ53TLBZ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/WQ53TLBZWFXZPFKDIFARAINWLG","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/WQ53TLBZWFXZPFKDIFARAINWLG.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WQ53TLBZ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2502.04909&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WQ53TLBZWFXZPFKDIFARAINWLG/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WQ53TLBZWFXZPFKDIFARAINWLG/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/WQ53TLBZWFXZPFKDIFARAINWLG/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/WQ53TLBZWFXZPFKDIFARAINWLG/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/WQ53TLBZWFXZPFKDIFARAINWLG/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/WQ53TLBZWFXZPFKDIFARAINWLG/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/WQ53TLBZWFXZPFKDIFARAINWLG/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:35:45.945528+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:35:45.945528+00:00"}