{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:WQSUBE3MJWL4OWCQFTQKS3HOCE","short_pith_number":"pith:WQSUBE3M","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"b42540936c4d97c758502ce0a96cee1125edd0d309c4ddc4092eb8cbaae1fc34","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2307.04346","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Can Large Language Models Write Good Property-Based Tests?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Caroline Lemieux, Joshua Sunshine, Rohan Padhye, Vasudev Vikram","submitted_at":"2023-07-10T05:09:33Z","abstract_excerpt":"Property-based testing (PBT), while an established technique in the software testing research community, is still relatively underused in real-world software. Pain points in writing property-based tests include implementing diverse random input generators and thinking of meaningful properties to test. Developers, however, are more amenable to writing documentation; plenty of library API documentation is available and can be used as natural language specifications for PBTs. As large language models (LLMs) have recently shown promise in a variety of coding tasks, we investigate using modern LLMs"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2307.04346","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.SE","submitted_at":"2023-07-10T05:09:33Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"0f4b3fe5b12a95d57d9f649a3546b1417a26b5abb90ec3c1968aa0dbe03f17bc","abstract_canon_sha256":"a33cab1859e1096ab2380b08be329ea58af7f4661c09a4f9d89b0fa3f40cdb47"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:46:17.458787Z","signature_b64":"PmXzlWz0vQ4awIe8pNsfNyRzEEKyFEfKrCSzn1q3yQzNZOFGplY+767Q6POK3oBcIuB5mpBG8FUK7AM0deVdCQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"b42540936c4d97c758502ce0a96cee1125edd0d309c4ddc4092eb8cbaae1fc34","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:46:17.458375Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:46:17.458375Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Can Large Language Models Write Good Property-Based Tests?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Caroline Lemieux, Joshua Sunshine, Rohan Padhye, Vasudev Vikram","submitted_at":"2023-07-10T05:09:33Z","abstract_excerpt":"Property-based testing (PBT), while an established technique in the software testing research community, is still relatively underused in real-world software. Pain points in writing property-based tests include implementing diverse random input generators and thinking of meaningful properties to test. Developers, however, are more amenable to writing documentation; plenty of library API documentation is available and can be used as natural language specifications for PBTs. As large language models (LLMs) have recently shown promise in a variety of coding tasks, we investigate using modern LLMs"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2307.04346","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2307.04346/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2307.04346","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:46:17.458432+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2307.04346v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:46:17.458432+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2307.04346","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:46:17.458432+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"WQSUBE3MJWL4","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:46:17.458432+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"WQSUBE3MJWL4OWCQ","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:46:17.458432+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"WQSUBE3M","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:46:17.458432+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":10,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.06747","citing_title":"Tensor Algebraic Property Skeletons: Amplifying Property-Based Testing for AI Compilers","ref_index":22,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.15229","citing_title":"PBT-Bench: Benchmarking AI Agents on Property-Based Testing","ref_index":15,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.15229","citing_title":"PBT-Bench: Benchmarking AI Agents on Property-Based Testing","ref_index":15,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.15229","citing_title":"PBT-Bench: Benchmarking AI Agents on Property-Based Testing","ref_index":15,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.18315","citing_title":"Effective LLM Code Refinement via Property-Oriented and Structurally Minimal Feedback","ref_index":18,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.08553","citing_title":"VeriContest: A Competitive-Programming Benchmark for Verifiable Code Generation","ref_index":45,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.21771","citing_title":"Generalizing Test Cases for Comprehensive Test Scenario Coverage","ref_index":40,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.11770","citing_title":"Enhancing Program Repair with Specification Guidance and Intermediate Behavioral Signals","ref_index":43,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.05203","citing_title":"Decision-Oriented Programming with Aporia","ref_index":55,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.13463","citing_title":"From Exploration to Specification: LLM-Based Property Generation for Mobile App Testing","ref_index":60,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/WQSUBE3MJWL4OWCQFTQKS3HOCE","json":"https://pith.science/pith/WQSUBE3MJWL4OWCQFTQKS3HOCE.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WQSUBE3MJWL4OWCQFTQKS3HOCE/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WQSUBE3MJWL4OWCQFTQKS3HOCE/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WQSUBE3M"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/WQSUBE3MJWL4OWCQFTQKS3HOCE","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/WQSUBE3MJWL4OWCQFTQKS3HOCE.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WQSUBE3M","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2307.04346&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WQSUBE3MJWL4OWCQFTQKS3HOCE/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WQSUBE3MJWL4OWCQFTQKS3HOCE/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/WQSUBE3MJWL4OWCQFTQKS3HOCE/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/WQSUBE3MJWL4OWCQFTQKS3HOCE/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/WQSUBE3MJWL4OWCQFTQKS3HOCE/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/WQSUBE3MJWL4OWCQFTQKS3HOCE/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/WQSUBE3MJWL4OWCQFTQKS3HOCE/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:46:17.458432+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:46:17.458432+00:00"}