{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:WRTCIVJJIY4CLB2ZZBIZDF4K3V","short_pith_number":"pith:WRTCIVJJ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"b4662455294638258759c85191978add4e5c586dc839ae824778200eb4e862c3","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2307.03217","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Quantification of Uncertainty with Adversarial Models","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"G\\\"unter Klambauer, Kajetan Schweighofer, Lukas Aichberger, Mykyta Ielanskyi, Sepp Hochreiter","submitted_at":"2023-07-06T17:56:10Z","abstract_excerpt":"Quantifying uncertainty is important for actionable predictions in real-world applications. A crucial part of predictive uncertainty quantification is the estimation of epistemic uncertainty, which is defined as an integral of the product between a divergence function and the posterior. Current methods such as Deep Ensembles or MC dropout underperform at estimating the epistemic uncertainty, since they primarily consider the posterior when sampling models. We suggest Quantification of Uncertainty with Adversarial Models (QUAM) to better estimate the epistemic uncertainty. QUAM identifies regio"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2307.03217","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2023-07-06T17:56:10Z","cross_cats_sorted":["stat.ML"],"title_canon_sha256":"16b41b0825034e1319cf6b13f4e1496f0999da3af6afc99cc84a21bc39f3fa99","abstract_canon_sha256":"1c3ecaf44d3eeca4c30aa413be0d0106c4581f6190870160d7b35f978abdf6fd"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T07:04:17.716901Z","signature_b64":"AjhcG1v0JEZGt22iVM23PlR/XGYtNo4bNfVPVWiw2gyZNpqnwEOOliD8raLS4/grr0jcT26Kof2Y4Xh+uqw9DQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"b4662455294638258759c85191978add4e5c586dc839ae824778200eb4e862c3","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T07:04:17.716408Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T07:04:17.716408Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Quantification of Uncertainty with Adversarial Models","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"G\\\"unter Klambauer, Kajetan Schweighofer, Lukas Aichberger, Mykyta Ielanskyi, Sepp Hochreiter","submitted_at":"2023-07-06T17:56:10Z","abstract_excerpt":"Quantifying uncertainty is important for actionable predictions in real-world applications. A crucial part of predictive uncertainty quantification is the estimation of epistemic uncertainty, which is defined as an integral of the product between a divergence function and the posterior. Current methods such as Deep Ensembles or MC dropout underperform at estimating the epistemic uncertainty, since they primarily consider the posterior when sampling models. We suggest Quantification of Uncertainty with Adversarial Models (QUAM) to better estimate the epistemic uncertainty. QUAM identifies regio"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2307.03217","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2307.03217/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2307.03217","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:04:17.716465+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2307.03217v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:04:17.716465+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2307.03217","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:04:17.716465+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"WRTCIVJJIY4C","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:04:17.716465+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"WRTCIVJJIY4CLB2Z","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:04:17.716465+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"WRTCIVJJ","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:04:17.716465+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2608.05995","citing_title":"A Unified Risk View of Uncertainty: Posterior Risk for Disentanglement and Evaluation Beyond Proxies","ref_index":31,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/WRTCIVJJIY4CLB2ZZBIZDF4K3V","json":"https://pith.science/pith/WRTCIVJJIY4CLB2ZZBIZDF4K3V.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WRTCIVJJIY4CLB2ZZBIZDF4K3V/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WRTCIVJJIY4CLB2ZZBIZDF4K3V/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WRTCIVJJ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/WRTCIVJJIY4CLB2ZZBIZDF4K3V","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/WRTCIVJJIY4CLB2ZZBIZDF4K3V.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WRTCIVJJ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2307.03217&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WRTCIVJJIY4CLB2ZZBIZDF4K3V/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WRTCIVJJIY4CLB2ZZBIZDF4K3V/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/WRTCIVJJIY4CLB2ZZBIZDF4K3V/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/WRTCIVJJIY4CLB2ZZBIZDF4K3V/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/WRTCIVJJIY4CLB2ZZBIZDF4K3V/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/WRTCIVJJIY4CLB2ZZBIZDF4K3V/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/WRTCIVJJIY4CLB2ZZBIZDF4K3V/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T07:04:17.716465+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T07:04:17.716465+00:00"}