{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:WSY7RHB2SNA67USX5KMLU2FK7M","short_pith_number":"pith:WSY7RHB2","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"b4b1f89c3a9341efd257ea98ba68aafb2fd7967e01b7a8a96d46ef48048e028a","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2502.10505","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Preference learning made easy: Everything should be understood through win rate","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Lily H. Zhang, Rajesh Ranganath","submitted_at":"2025-02-14T19:01:34Z","abstract_excerpt":"Preference learning, or the task of aligning generative models to preference comparison data, has yet to reach the conceptual maturity of classification, density estimation, etc. To close this gap, this work presents a framework to understand preference learning starting from the sampling distribution of pairwise preference data. First, we prove that the only evaluation of a generative model that respects both preferences and prevalences in the data distribution is a form of win rate, justifying win rate as the focal point to understand preference learning. We then analyze preference learning "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2502.10505","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2025-02-14T19:01:34Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CL","stat.ML"],"title_canon_sha256":"6444d596c81f4e92fd9583fd9985a5decea709f7e0e81740d6668fd19ca0171d","abstract_canon_sha256":"9dc8da2677913ba2eaf57ad0d0819cd9fa805a6f5f6c8f6f734f56ba6ba43420"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:43:30.753819Z","signature_b64":"Hk6IiCN9U4ME7FjSs1i4sRFRbQoc8oDzOIpJTG/eb4epmrCiMG4sAqyRuaR8N9hKM80Cvggs50lvfVXeOWFACA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"b4b1f89c3a9341efd257ea98ba68aafb2fd7967e01b7a8a96d46ef48048e028a","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:43:30.753131Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:43:30.753131Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Preference learning made easy: Everything should be understood through win rate","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Lily H. Zhang, Rajesh Ranganath","submitted_at":"2025-02-14T19:01:34Z","abstract_excerpt":"Preference learning, or the task of aligning generative models to preference comparison data, has yet to reach the conceptual maturity of classification, density estimation, etc. To close this gap, this work presents a framework to understand preference learning starting from the sampling distribution of pairwise preference data. First, we prove that the only evaluation of a generative model that respects both preferences and prevalences in the data distribution is a form of win rate, justifying win rate as the focal point to understand preference learning. We then analyze preference learning "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2502.10505","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2502.10505/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2502.10505","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:43:30.753216+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2502.10505v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:43:30.753216+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2502.10505","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:43:30.753216+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"WSY7RHB2SNA6","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:43:30.753216+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"WSY7RHB2SNA67USX","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:43:30.753216+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"WSY7RHB2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:43:30.753216+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/WSY7RHB2SNA67USX5KMLU2FK7M","json":"https://pith.science/pith/WSY7RHB2SNA67USX5KMLU2FK7M.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WSY7RHB2SNA67USX5KMLU2FK7M/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WSY7RHB2SNA67USX5KMLU2FK7M/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WSY7RHB2"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/WSY7RHB2SNA67USX5KMLU2FK7M","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/WSY7RHB2SNA67USX5KMLU2FK7M.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WSY7RHB2","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2502.10505&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WSY7RHB2SNA67USX5KMLU2FK7M/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WSY7RHB2SNA67USX5KMLU2FK7M/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/WSY7RHB2SNA67USX5KMLU2FK7M/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/WSY7RHB2SNA67USX5KMLU2FK7M/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/WSY7RHB2SNA67USX5KMLU2FK7M/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/WSY7RHB2SNA67USX5KMLU2FK7M/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/WSY7RHB2SNA67USX5KMLU2FK7M/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:43:30.753216+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:43:30.753216+00:00"}