{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2012:WTGJRL56VQY554W4OC7PXNS3IZ","short_pith_number":"pith:WTGJRL56","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"b4cc98afbeac31def2dc70befbb65b4661b55e2458012478b42e16557a698ec2","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1210.1463","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Confounding Causality Principles: comment on R\\'edei and san Pedro's \"Distinguishing Causality Principles\"","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Joe Henson","submitted_at":"2012-10-04T14:25:31Z","abstract_excerpt":"R\\'edei and san Pedro discuss my \"Comparing Causality Principles,\" their main aim being to distinguish reasonable weakened versions of two causality principles presented there, \"SO1\" and \"SO2\". They also argue that the proof that SO1 implies SO2 contains a flaw. Here, a reply is made to a number of points raised in their paper. It is argued that the \"intuition\" that SO1 should be stronger than SO2 is implicitly based on a false premise. It is pointed out that a similar weakening of SO2 was already considered in the original paper. The technical definition of the new conditions is shown to be d"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1210.1463","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2012-10-04T14:25:31Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"0411a417c09c4b923ed1b2fb1ec160163dcd063ac426294c09a0e7662f587622","abstract_canon_sha256":"e3f7794d6ae9b2a1af8793ca70fa4be605827430eb99b8960600222f057cd58e"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T03:44:03.450817Z","signature_b64":"wCQwddJsMOBqYu9WlWq+CQ6/Kvj8TW7IH+JEQy8gYgFCARcV/rKh4NiQM5Q5SsB0AVACybYzxWqs8HDocn7SAQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"b4cc98afbeac31def2dc70befbb65b4661b55e2458012478b42e16557a698ec2","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T03:44:03.450042Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T03:44:03.450042Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Confounding Causality Principles: comment on R\\'edei and san Pedro's \"Distinguishing Causality Principles\"","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Joe Henson","submitted_at":"2012-10-04T14:25:31Z","abstract_excerpt":"R\\'edei and san Pedro discuss my \"Comparing Causality Principles,\" their main aim being to distinguish reasonable weakened versions of two causality principles presented there, \"SO1\" and \"SO2\". They also argue that the proof that SO1 implies SO2 contains a flaw. Here, a reply is made to a number of points raised in their paper. It is argued that the \"intuition\" that SO1 should be stronger than SO2 is implicitly based on a false premise. It is pointed out that a similar weakening of SO2 was already considered in the original paper. The technical definition of the new conditions is shown to be d"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1210.1463","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1210.1463","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:44:03.450168+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1210.1463v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:44:03.450168+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1210.1463","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:44:03.450168+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"WTGJRL56VQY5","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:27:27.928770+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"WTGJRL56VQY554W4","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:27:27.928770+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"WTGJRL56","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:27:27.928770+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/WTGJRL56VQY554W4OC7PXNS3IZ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/WTGJRL56VQY554W4OC7PXNS3IZ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WTGJRL56VQY554W4OC7PXNS3IZ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WTGJRL56VQY554W4OC7PXNS3IZ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WTGJRL56"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/WTGJRL56VQY554W4OC7PXNS3IZ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/WTGJRL56VQY554W4OC7PXNS3IZ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WTGJRL56","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1210.1463&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WTGJRL56VQY554W4OC7PXNS3IZ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WTGJRL56VQY554W4OC7PXNS3IZ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/WTGJRL56VQY554W4OC7PXNS3IZ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/WTGJRL56VQY554W4OC7PXNS3IZ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/WTGJRL56VQY554W4OC7PXNS3IZ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/WTGJRL56VQY554W4OC7PXNS3IZ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/WTGJRL56VQY554W4OC7PXNS3IZ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T03:44:03.450168+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T03:44:03.450168+00:00"}