{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2021:WVWWHA2REFRE4IB6EEXRPAPY2Z","short_pith_number":"pith:WVWWHA2R","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"b56d63835121624e203e212f1781f8d654fe442a43478227911a726da2d4471d","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2102.07536","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"The corruptive force of AI-generated advice","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["econ.GN","q-fin.EC"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Bernd Irlenbusch, Margarita Leib, Marloes Hagens, Nils C. K\\\"obis, Rainer Michael Rilke","submitted_at":"2021-02-15T13:15:12Z","abstract_excerpt":"Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly becoming a trusted advisor in people's lives. A new concern arises if AI persuades people to break ethical rules for profit. Employing a large-scale behavioural experiment (N = 1,572), we test whether AI-generated advice can corrupt people. We further test whether transparency about AI presence, a commonly proposed policy, mitigates potential harm of AI-generated advice. Using the Natural Language Processing algorithm, GPT-2, we generated honesty-promoting and dishonesty-promoting advice. Participants read one type of advice before engaging in a tas"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2102.07536","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2021-02-15T13:15:12Z","cross_cats_sorted":["econ.GN","q-fin.EC"],"title_canon_sha256":"bd836767a7e3cad7d515ef78f57cf2cff7e8e9f044f65d7db88a259eed7c9e60","abstract_canon_sha256":"84cc881da2943c51cc3b5a3ba64ea908ea0897c80d260081efcc83316af0707a"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T02:15:17.396992Z","signature_b64":"OErdbN8Q8xRavL9T20/vO68WKrboSwre4Op57PNDaW5SBRHGgELMn2kZXJmup153LW7TncXRJzqXDSDB3/0FDg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"b56d63835121624e203e212f1781f8d654fe442a43478227911a726da2d4471d","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T02:15:17.396541Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T02:15:17.396541Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"The corruptive force of AI-generated advice","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["econ.GN","q-fin.EC"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Bernd Irlenbusch, Margarita Leib, Marloes Hagens, Nils C. K\\\"obis, Rainer Michael Rilke","submitted_at":"2021-02-15T13:15:12Z","abstract_excerpt":"Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly becoming a trusted advisor in people's lives. A new concern arises if AI persuades people to break ethical rules for profit. Employing a large-scale behavioural experiment (N = 1,572), we test whether AI-generated advice can corrupt people. We further test whether transparency about AI presence, a commonly proposed policy, mitigates potential harm of AI-generated advice. Using the Natural Language Processing algorithm, GPT-2, we generated honesty-promoting and dishonesty-promoting advice. Participants read one type of advice before engaging in a tas"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2102.07536","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2102.07536/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2102.07536","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:15:17.396597+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2102.07536v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:15:17.396597+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2102.07536","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:15:17.396597+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"WVWWHA2REFRE","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:15:17.396597+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"WVWWHA2REFRE4IB6","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:15:17.396597+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"WVWWHA2R","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:15:17.396597+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.00854","citing_title":"A field experiment of social influence and behavioral contagion with bots on Reddit","ref_index":29,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/WVWWHA2REFRE4IB6EEXRPAPY2Z","json":"https://pith.science/pith/WVWWHA2REFRE4IB6EEXRPAPY2Z.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WVWWHA2REFRE4IB6EEXRPAPY2Z/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WVWWHA2REFRE4IB6EEXRPAPY2Z/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WVWWHA2R"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/WVWWHA2REFRE4IB6EEXRPAPY2Z","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/WVWWHA2REFRE4IB6EEXRPAPY2Z.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WVWWHA2R","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2102.07536&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WVWWHA2REFRE4IB6EEXRPAPY2Z/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WVWWHA2REFRE4IB6EEXRPAPY2Z/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/WVWWHA2REFRE4IB6EEXRPAPY2Z/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/WVWWHA2REFRE4IB6EEXRPAPY2Z/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/WVWWHA2REFRE4IB6EEXRPAPY2Z/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/WVWWHA2REFRE4IB6EEXRPAPY2Z/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/WVWWHA2REFRE4IB6EEXRPAPY2Z/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T02:15:17.396597+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T02:15:17.396597+00:00"}